Jump to content

Digilux 2 Images


chkphoto

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Wow!

 

How and where is that dodge and burn in Lightroom?

 

Well, at least in 2.4, there is an adjustment brush that can, among several other things, be used for dodging and burning. It lacks some of the refinements possible when painting on, say a soft-light blending layer in Photoshop, but it´s easily the equal of what was possible in the wet darkroom.

 

Also, there are gradients and post-crop vignetting that are quite useful in many cases.

 

For myself, I´ve just started exploring LightZone as an alternative to Photoshop (I´m still using CS2), and it allows very extensive local and global tone adjustments. But, like Photoshop, one works with an exported file, not nondestructively on the original raw.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I see that, it has been there since 2.0 or earlier.

 

Never used it and just tried. Not the same as dodge/burn in PS where you can (which is what I do) brighten hightlights 10% and then burn shadows 10%.

 

Will experiment with it a bit more. Nice to be able to adjust exposure in parts of the picture which you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And to answer your questions as to the program I post-process in - it is LightZone. I have been using it since it came out. It gives me the closest dodging and burning that I used to use in my darkroom - except I would be cutting out holes and shapes in cards and taking all day to make one print. The only other programs I use is Neat Image for noise (LZ doesn't do a very good job at this.) and Blow-up 2 if I need a larger image size from the Digilux 2. That's it.

 

chk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another vote for LightZone which I see as a nice complementary application to Lightroom, which I use as my main manager/processor. Things have been very quiet from the LightZone developer for some time and I did wonder if it might be in terminal decline - but there have recently been some renewed signs of life.

That's good news because the application has some unique features which are ideal for specific images. There is a nice add-on which streamlines the round trip journey to and from LR.

Don't know about Aperture but presumably that can also integrate with LTZ whenever required.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another vote for LightZone which I see as a nice complementary application to Lightroom, which I use as my main manager/processor. Things have been very quiet from the LightZone developer for some time and I did wonder if it might be in terminal decline - but there have recently been some renewed signs of life.

That's good news because the application has some unique features which are ideal for specific images. There is a nice add-on which streamlines the round trip journey to and from LR.

Don't know about Aperture but presumably that can also integrate with LTZ whenever required.

 

In Aperture you can set your "Edit With" to an application of your choice... and indicate if you want a Tiff or Jpeg. So, I'd think roundtripping shouldn't be an issue.

 

I'll have to look at this program.

 

JT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

And to answer your questions as to the program I post-process in - it is LightZone. I have been using it since it came out. It gives me the closest dodging and burning that I used to use in my darkroom - except I would be cutting out holes and shapes in cards and taking all day to make one print. The only other programs I use is Neat Image for noise (LZ doesn't do a very good job at this.) and Blow-up 2 if I need a larger image size from the Digilux 2. That's it.

 

chk

 

How are the prints from images treated with Blow-up 2? How large have you done and do you do your own printing or use a lab?

 

Thanks,

 

JT

Link to post
Share on other sites

How are the prints from images treated with Blow-up 2? How large have you done and do you do your own printing or use a lab?

 

Thanks,

 

JT

 

John

 

The largest blow up is a 20" longest side from both the Digilux 2 & 3. I have giclees printed by a printer that specializes in them. And I have been pleased as have the purchasers of the prints. Actually, I am amazed at the detail retained in the resulting up-sized image. But not all images work well. Too much noise in the first place and you can't have a pleasing image. The files from the Digilux 3 for whatever reason has a great ability to take up-sizing. If you want I will post a forum acceptable section of a 100% native size and a 100% up-sized if that will be of any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How are the prints from images treated with Blow-up 2? How large have you done and do you do your own printing or use a lab?

 

Thanks,

 

JT

John (and others interested in Blowup)

I recall an exchange of postings in the general forum at the time I was investigating the first version of AlienSkin BlowUP. By far the most influential example was offered by David Adamson, a professional printer in the USA. A quick search shows that his work has emerged again this year. See http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m8-forum/9022-30-x-40-inch-m8-prints.html

 

I realize that he was not using a D2, but his claims for the M8 quality enlargements really stirred some folks into expressions of disbelief. If you search further you may find the original postings. I have used BlowUp successfully for enlarging some of my digital files, even from my D2, for stock use but I have not actually obtained big prints for myself. I have no connection with David Adamson, but he was extremely helpful to me when I posed a similar question some time ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...