johnastovall Posted May 14, 2009 Share #1 Posted May 14, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) Leciaflex SL2 APO 180/3.4 Telyt-R .72 M7 What do you wish you had owned sooner? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 14, 2009 Posted May 14, 2009 Hi johnastovall, Take a look here Three Leica products I wish I'd owned sooner.... I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
bybrett Posted May 14, 2009 Share #2 Posted May 14, 2009 APO 180/3.4 it is the best lens I have ever owned no question. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildlightphoto Posted May 15, 2009 Share #3 Posted May 15, 2009 280mm f/4 APO-Telyt-R 1.4x APO-Extender-R DMR Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBA Posted May 15, 2009 Share #4 Posted May 15, 2009 My newest pieces of gear: R8 Motor 50 Summilux-R The APO 180 3.4 Telyt is one of the main reasons I got into the R system and I have not been disappointed. It's an absolute masterpiece. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted May 15, 2009 Share #5 Posted May 15, 2009 105-280 R. DMR. And the M3 back in the seventies... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wizard Posted May 15, 2009 Share #6 Posted May 15, 2009 SL2. Way out of reach at the time I wanted it (which was back in the mid seventies). If I could have afforded it back then, I would most likely not have bought any other camera since then. Andy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Joachim_I Posted May 15, 2009 Share #7 Posted May 15, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) The 50mm Summicron-M "50 Years." It's such a pleasure to use with the MP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edlaurpic Posted May 15, 2009 Share #8 Posted May 15, 2009 Regarding the 180/3.4, I've had one for at least 20 years, actually maybe longer, having gotten it whenever it was first offered to the public. When I first got it, I thought it was fantastic. Then I moved to digital but not to the DMR, so the 180/3.4 sat in a drawer for 10 years. When I finally got an R9 and DMR I also got both the 180/2.8 APO (ROM) and the 180/2. Meanwhile, the 180/3.4 is still in the drawer because, for some reason, I had come to the conclusion—unsubstantiated by my own photos, mind you—that the 180/2.8 APO was superior to the 180/3.4 and the 180/2 simply blew the other two away for great bokeh. This is embarassing to admit that I formed these opinions without giving the 180/3.4 another chance on the R9/DMR. Should I have given it another chance? If so, what is it about the 180/3.4 that is superior to the 180/2.8 APO (forget the 180/2...it's a different horse for a different course, which I realize).? Is it the relative light weight and smaller package that the 180/3.4 represents or is there another reason you are all so big on it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglasco Posted May 15, 2009 Share #9 Posted May 15, 2009 Sl and digilux 2 just had both cameras in the last few months Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcoombs Posted May 15, 2009 Share #10 Posted May 15, 2009 The M8. 5 years ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mystic Posted May 15, 2009 Share #11 Posted May 15, 2009 my beloved R8 . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
offshore Posted May 15, 2009 Share #12 Posted May 15, 2009 For me the M3 with a 50 mm F2 DR Summicron. The M6 with any lens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpclee Posted May 15, 2009 Share #13 Posted May 15, 2009 R9 DMR Pradovit CA 2500 (slide projector) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockyIII Posted May 16, 2009 Share #14 Posted May 16, 2009 I wish I had bought an M8 before I spent so much money on Nikon equipment. Sometimes I wish I had bought a 35 Summilux before I bought a 35 Summicron. Rocky Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
topoxforddoc Posted May 16, 2009 Share #15 Posted May 16, 2009 DMR 180/2 Summicron 280/4 APO Although if it weren't for the first Leica kit I bought (M6TTL and 50 cron), I would never had trodden this long and illuminating path. Now maybe, if I'd owned those earlier? Charlie Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posto 6 Posted May 16, 2009 Share #16 Posted May 16, 2009 SL2 Mot- although started my SLR system with R4 in early '80s before I knew better M6J- still wonderful and unsurpassed in usage and feel 80mm Summilux-R- after all these years, still magically expressive 35mm Summilux Titanium non-asph- far superior quality and feel to previous Canadian one bought new in 1981, always a pleasure to use, creates uniquely wonderful images. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted May 16, 2009 Share #17 Posted May 16, 2009 Too many posts about R equipment ... ... let's re-establish balance : - Summicron Asph 35, at the times in which I still used film. - M3 (or M4) in the '70s - Probably, the 24 2,8 asph I'm going to have next week... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLV Posted May 16, 2009 Share #18 Posted May 16, 2009 M8, 35 cron IV coded, Elmarit 90. Why? Because it is the only three M series leica I own. The search isn't finished. All the best Jean-Luc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkCambridgeshire Posted May 16, 2009 Share #19 Posted May 16, 2009 Sl and digilux 2 just had both cameras in the last few months Do you have any pictures taken with the S1? And which S1 variant is it? Which software are you using with the S1? Cheers dunk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenerrolrd Posted May 17, 2009 Share #20 Posted May 17, 2009 Regarding the 180/3.4, I've had one for at least 20 years, actually maybe longer, having gotten it whenever it was first offered to the public. When I first got it, I thought it was fantastic. Then I moved to digital but not to the DMR, so the 180/3.4 sat in a drawer for 10 years. When I finally got an R9 and DMR I also got both the 180/2.8 APO (ROM) and the 180/2. Meanwhile, the 180/3.4 is still in the drawer because, for some reason, I had come to the conclusion—unsubstantiated by my own photos, mind you—that the 180/2.8 APO was superior to the 180/3.4 and the 180/2 simply blew the other two away for great bokeh. This is embarassing to admit that I formed these opinions without giving the 180/3.4 another chance on the R9/DMR. Should I have given it another chance? If so, what is it about the 180/3.4 that is superior to the 180/2.8 APO (forget the 180/2...it's a different horse for a different course, which I realize).? Is it the relative light weight and smaller package that the 180/3.4 represents or is there another reason you are all so big on it? Surprisingly I have almost the exact same experience withe the Leica 180 s . I bought the 180 3.4 apo when it was released went through a few copies but still have the last version with the 60mm filter. I also have both the 2.8 and 2.0 apo s and use them on my DMR. For pure optical performance the 180 3.4 is still competitive with the newer lenses. The big difference is the focus/handling. The 180 2.8 apo is by far the best handling longer lens I have seen. The focus mount was designed for two finger adjustments .....I can follow focus a surfer with this lens. It also mates with the 1.4apo extender to create a great 250/4 (thats a 350FOV on a DMR). The 180 3.4 was designed for military use at distances . It performs its best at infinity. It also has a very long throw(read slow but precise) ....I always found it difficult to use for sports ( and used the older 180/2.8 pre apo version just for the ability to focus). For travel the 180 3.4 is still a fine choice but I find the 180 2.8 apo as an almost perfect lens. The 180 2 is just to big and heavy for most of my work . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.