Jump to content

Noctilux price gone wild?


innerimager

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Unfortunately , Ebay often sets the price in the marketplace. Sellers watch what happens on Ebay because they want to get the most that they can....... And for the record , I wouldnt have paid more than $5000 for Britneys gum !

 

Ken

Link to post
Share on other sites

seriously thinking about selling mine now. it doesn't focus from f2 to 5.6 on the m8 and I'm pretty much done with film. Loved it while it lasted but I keep thinking of the 2 new lenses I could buy if I sell her. Also my cv351.2 makes comparable images, if not better in many circumstances.

 

Very interested in your input. Just got a CV 35/1.2 and finds extremely sharp in the central part of the image even wide open. I also like its low contrast which makes great street photos at night. Can you please elaborate more on the comparison with the Nocti?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had two Noctis a month ago. Should have kept the other one a little longer.

 

I have 2 Noctis as well ( 1.2 and 1.0 ) and am not considering selling, although I seldom use them. When I do, it is for the special effects that I can't seem to get with any other lens. It is true, however, that this "effect" is not really calculable, at least not for me.

Teddy

Link to post
Share on other sites

and you never take you car out of the garage as well ? :p

 

and that would really be the shame of this. I refuse to relegate this lens to a museum shelf, I'm going to shoot the heck out of it! best....Peter

 

No worries friends. I continue shooting with it as before (I don't see the purpose of buying camera gear to lock it up in a safe). But it is a strange feeling to run around with some 10,000 Euros (= M8 + Nocti) around your neck (ok -- some women have much more hanging around their neck :D ), in particular if your kids say: Daddy, can I try?

 

Makes you also wonder why Leica has to produce a lense in a manner that makes it so expensive. During a recent family meeting, I shot with the Nocti and my brother in law with the new Canon 85/1.2 on his D5. I tried out that combination and found it worked pretty well (at a certain age and in low light, autofocus does help). I have not yer compared prints or pictures on larger screens but what I saw on the camera monitor was very nice indeed. And this thing costs some 2,000 Euros -- not almost 5,000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 2 Noctis as well ( 1.2 and 1.0 ) and am not considering selling, although I seldom use them. When I do, it is for the special effects that I can't seem to get with any other lens. It is true, however, that this "effect" is not really calculable, at least not for me.

Teddy

 

I use mine. Its a user lens. The other one I had was much nicer with 6-bit coding. Bought the user much cheaper(2400$ one month ago :D ) and sold the nicer one. Strangely enough I see no difference in the pics :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interested in your input. Just got a CV 35/1.2 and finds extremely sharp in the central part of the image even wide open. I also like its low contrast which makes great street photos at night. Can you please elaborate more on the comparison with the Nocti?

 

I am not familiar with the CV lens, but I reckon the biggest difference between it and the Nocti (apart from maybe 1/2 stop) would be the focal length. Just a different lens alround.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"... Also, the fact that the rumored Nocti will hit the streets at $10k also means that within a year it may be $11k due to the yearly Leica price increases..."

 

Read; dollar fall.

 

With the current state of affairs of US economy an eventual new Noctilux 50 mm 0,9 (on a M8 1,33 crop) will be 12k to 13k US$ at the time such a monster reaches the shelves.

 

And mind you....

 

This monster will have a tiny DOF of less than half an inch at two yards. The market segment of such a thing will be 1)people payed in Euros (or NOK, SEK, DKK etc.) with 2)an eyesights of eagles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read; dollar fall.

 

With the current state of affairs of US economy an eventual new Noctilux 50 mm 0,9 (on a M8 1,33 crop) will be 12k to 13k US$ at the time such a monster reaches the shelves.

 

And mind you....

 

This monster will have a tiny DOF of less than half an inch at two yards. The market segment of such a thing will be 1)people payed in Euros (or NOK, SEK, DKK etc.) with 2)an eyesights of eagles.

 

Next thing you know, people will be quoting this rumour as true!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the depth of field is so narrow at f/1 the movement of your subject and your own ability to stay still is much more significant than any supposed backfocus.

 

This lens is so much fun on the M7 or the M8. Great for lowlight, moody portraits with lots of shadow.

 

I take it to the restaurant, to my friends' dachas, on picnics - anywhere I'm going where the light's going to be low or where I want to play with light and shade.

 

That's the spirit in which you should approach this lens. Stop taking it so seriously!

 

Maybe the price rise is a sign that more people are open to the joys of this lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this mean that it still focus shift a bit after stepping down from 2.0?

 

Does anyone has a Noct that focus accurately at all stops?

 

My M8 + Noct originally seriously back focussed. After a trip to Solms they are both virtually perfect, which is absolutely essential for this combo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this mean that it still focus shift a bit after stepping down from 2.0?

 

Does anyone has a Noct that focus accurately at all stops?

 

Mine don't. Even after two trips to Solms. But it predictably frontfocuses with a ca 5cm at 1,0 and the senter of DOF shifts backwards - and widens, gradually when a smaller aparture is applied. It is close to impossible to focus it accurately at shorter distances. At least; my eyesight is not good enough.

 

I have the old and no longer produced Canon EF 50 mm 1,0L which I use on my 1Ds III. This one is impossible to focus manually with the focusing screens of D-SLR's of today. But the 1Ds III/EF 50 mm 1,0L combo also front focuses 'slightly' at full aparture - when using AF. And the DOF drifts backwards when stopped down. Which is due to physical laws.

 

Examples bellow:

 

1)

From the Canon combo - 1Ds III / EF 50 mm 1,0L

 

2)

From the Leica Combo - M8 / Noctilux

 

Both without any filters, but with exposures corrected to make the results similar.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...