Jump to content

Leica M EV1: The first M with EVF instead of Rangefinder


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, jaapv said:

Hmm. I think that they are relying on sales expectations that may be - or not be- in step with reality. It would not be the first time that they overestimated, particularly in an internet age where a small vocal group can easily skew estimates. As I said earlier - remember the X-Vario, Digilux 3 and hot-potato drop of the CL system? I wish them that they are right - but I would not bet too much on it.

They sure priced it to recover R&D with as few sales as possible. 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 5 Minuten schrieb SrMi:

The difference is almost USD 1K. How much cheaper could it be than the M11 with included RF mechanism vs included Q3's EVF?

Except it is not the Q3’s EVF because it is only 60hz and the M11 is turning 4 in a bit more than 2 months.

And was not the argument that the RF is extremely time intensive to manufacture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Xelamoon said:

Except it is not the Q3’s EVF because it is only 60hz and the M11 is turning 4 in a bit more than 2 months.

And was not the argument that the RF is extremely time intensive to manufacture.

The EVF is Q3's but M-EV1 cannot (or won't) feed it data at 120HZ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, SrMi said:

The difference is almost USD 1K. How much cheaper could it be than the M11 with included RF mechanism vs included Q3's EVF?

Without any insight in the production costs that is an unanswerable question. But we do know that the price of the RF mechanism is in the range of over 1500 EUR, that there is no need to diverge from the supply of sensors and other electronic parts and the retooling for mechanical bits must be minimal. 
The price margin will be set by sales expectations. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Xelamoon said:

But are you not squarely in the number 1 target audience of old timers? Same as the person with the 1953 name. I see mostly 70+ year olds defending the camera and its half hearted execution.

I may be the person you mean (😁) but if this camera was aimed at me, then it failed. I’m 70+ and will stick to AF for digital and MF for film. But I can still see a market for this camera with people with different experience, age, shooting practice, physical characteristics, confidence levels, income and simple wants.

I seriously doubt this camera was targeted at 70+ old timers; I think it was intended to draw in a new audience for Leica. 95% of a younger age group of photographers will be uninterested in manual focusing and no IBIS, but Leica - with its prices - has never aimed for the mass market. They are doing comfortably in their small niche. They only need to attract a small percentage of the photography market to be a success. 

Edited by LocalHero1953
  • Like 5
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 15 Minuten schrieb jaapv:

Why not. The resultant quality counts, not the numbers. 

This I don’t get. Saying: “Oh well, we just couldn’t figure out how to run the EVF at 120hz or create new focusing aids.” Does not seem like quality engineering to me, because yes electrical and software are also part of the engineering experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Eugene Young said:

I really do not understand the price of this camera. They take out AF and most importantly Lux lens from Q3 and then pricing much more than Q3. The price of this so called M v1 , 5 grands, at most 6 grandish would be enough.

The price was made so high in order to accumulate free funds for R&D and to make EV2 with a new focus assistant😁

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Xelamoon said:

This I don’t get. Saying: “Oh well, we just couldn’t figure out how to run the EVF at 120hz or create new focusing aids.” Does not seem like quality engineering to me, because yes electrical and software are also part of the engineering experience.

The highest specification does not always mean the most desirable quality. I do not think that any of us is qualified to judge a design decision without any knowledge of the reasons behind it, and based on a single number too. So far the comments on the EVF are more than positive, that is what counts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...