Tseg Posted August 22 Share #101 Posted August 22 Advertisement (gone after registration) Very nice summary by Smudgerer. The M11-D is my only M camera and I will add, based on my own experiences, that the Visoflex 2 and several new close-focus lenses really makes this camera multi-dimensional. As you probably know, only an M11 body can optimize use of the Visoflex 2. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 22 Posted August 22 Hi Tseg, Take a look here How many of you are happy with their M11-D. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
pgh Posted August 22 Share #102 Posted August 22 11 hours ago, pgh said: Whatever the term or method it’s easier to get a handheld image sharp with a 50mm lens at 1/60 on the 24 mp m10 than it is to get one on the m11 at 18mp, by about 1- 1.5 stops roughly, in my actual use, which is all I really care about. @SrMi ^ see my above statement. Actual use. Field use. I own an M10M, and with the same technique and shooting habits I need roughly a stop faster shutter speed / focal length for the same reliably sharp images I need on my M10. I accept it more readily with the M10M because noise and monochrome images is a different sort of thing. When I rented an M11 it was a bit worse, and it was still present (if slightly mitigated) at the smaller file sizes for given shutter speeds. Yes I thought that was a little strange, but whatever. Call this a feeling (exif information and seeing unsharp imagery isn't a feeling, but whatever), call it constant field testing, call it whatever you want. I don't know how much more explicitly I can put it. I don't care about how these things register in a lab - I care about what happens when I'm doing my work, which is the only relevant test. As others have pointed out, you can just shoot at a faster shutter speed. Then no issues. Except that means compromises sometimes, and that's up for the user to define if that's an issue. For some of us, it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elmars Posted August 22 Share #103 Posted August 22 vor 35 Minuten schrieb pgh: I own an M10M, and with the same technique and shooting habits I need roughly a stop faster shutter speed / focal length for the same reliably sharp images I need on my M10. At what magnification are you looking at the photos of the M10 and M11? Always 100 %? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgh Posted August 22 Share #104 Posted August 22 (edited) 4 hours ago, elmars said: At what magnification are you looking at the photos of the M10 and M11? Always 100 %? Is there any other relevant magnification for pixel peeping sharpness? Correct, I am not comparing an image magnified at 200% image to 100% one. Edited August 22 by pgh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DenverSteve Posted August 23 Share #105 Posted August 23 19 hours ago, elmars said: This refers to pgh post No 80 on page 4 of this thread. The M11 produces blurry images. Has anyone bothered to compare it statistically with cameras with lower resolution? I've owned the M11 since the first batches were shipped and I've never observed or heard of the M11 producing blurry images. In fact some might say the M11 produces images that are too sharp........... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgh Posted August 23 Share #106 Posted August 23 1 hour ago, DenverSteve said: I've owned the M11 since the first batches were shipped and I've never observed or heard of the M11 producing blurry images. In fact some might say the M11 produces images that are too sharp........... Might be good to read for more context as the summary you respond to is disingenuous and incomplete. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
T25UFO Posted August 23 Share #107 Posted August 23 Advertisement (gone after registration) On 8/22/2025 at 8:57 AM, Smudgerer said: The ASA capabilities of the camera enables this solution without a problem. Ah, ASA instead of ISO . . . we come from the same generation 🙂 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smudgerer Posted August 23 Share #108 Posted August 23 39 minutes ago, T25UFO said: Ah, ASA instead of ISO . . . we come from the same generation 🙂 Probably so, before language and a few other things got bastardised for little or no sound reasons........ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlashGordonPhotography Posted August 23 Share #109 Posted August 23 Before we come to blows, I'd invite everyone to try electronic shutter before declaring the fault being the higher resolution. You may be surprised. Gordon 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
setuporg Posted August 24 Share #110 Posted August 24 14 hours ago, T25UFO said: Ah, ASA instead of ISO . . . we come from the same generation 🙂 What is it in DIN? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elmars Posted August 24 Share #111 Posted August 24 100 ASA/ISO is 21 DIN, 50 ASA/ISO is 18 DIN. 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenykepesz Posted August 27 Share #112 Posted August 27 (edited) after a few months of daily use, an interesting kind of 'patina' appears to develop on my M11-D, kind of a 'wear on gear' pattern, but just on the ISO/ASA/DIN dial, for now at least... i didn't check yet the pattern's counterface, carved in cotton assumably. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited August 27 by fenykepesz 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/421428-how-many-of-you-are-happy-with-their-m11-d/?do=findComment&comment=5854600'>More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now