algrove Posted January 9 Share #1 Posted January 9 Advertisement (gone after registration) I find this interesting since we always hear that the M is Leicas flagship camera. That seems to no longer true since a few stores now say the Q has out sold the M for some time. Even the SL3 has out sold the M at Leica Miami. At a recent Paris photo fair Leica acknowledged the Q had out sold the M to that 2024 date. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 9 Posted January 9 Hi algrove, Take a look here Leica Miami best selling list does not include M cameras up to #4 on list. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
rxj Posted January 9 Share #2 Posted January 9 Do you have the list? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lexffm Posted January 9 Share #3 Posted January 9 There could be various reasons for this: 1. It's just a snapshot (how long does this list cover? 2. The people there don't really want an M 3. The salespeople may be more likely to recommend other models because they themselves aren't "M" fans. I don't know anyone there but it's possible. In my opinion, the M has been a bestseller for decades, so it can easily not be at the top of the list... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrMi Posted January 9 Share #4 Posted January 9 39 minutes ago, algrove said: I find this interesting since we always hear that the M is Leicas flagship camera. That seems to no longer true since a few stores now say the Q has out sold the M for some time. Even the SL3 has out sold the M at Leica Miami. At a recent Paris photo fair Leica acknowledged the Q had out sold the M to that 2024 date. A flagship camera is never a bestseller. 2 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
costa43 Posted January 9 Share #5 Posted January 9 It could also come down to the fact that the M is now rather ridiculously priced at nearly 10 grand for the body. 4 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GFW2-SCUSA Posted January 9 Share #6 Posted January 9 Perhaps the M isn't listed because they are so hard to get. Leica Miami is out of stock most of the time for the M11. They are an honest bunch so I suspect the figures are correct. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliot Harper Posted January 9 Share #7 Posted January 9 Advertisement (gone after registration) Patek is certainly better than Rolex in every aspect such as design, complication, etc. But patek sells less than one-tens of Rolex every year . 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smogg Posted January 9 Share #8 Posted January 9 It's not surprising at all: pop music is much more popular than classical music. 6 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted January 9 Share #9 Posted January 9 (edited) It wouldn't surprise me that the Q outsells the M and SL (and S). OTOH it may be related to model timings: the Q3 43 was launched recently while the M11P was earlier last year - and the M11 series may only have another year of life. Edited January 9 by LocalHero1953 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smogg Posted January 9 Share #10 Posted January 9 There is a joke: Two cars stop at a traffic light - a Renault and a Lamborghini. The Renault driver, turning the handle, lowers the window and asks the Lamborghini driver: - How is the car in general? Does it break down? - It seems like a normal car, why are you asking? - Well, I see that not many people buy them😜 2 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliot Harper Posted January 9 Share #11 Posted January 9 4 minutes ago, Al Brown said: I strongly disagree on design. Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, as they say. I just don’t like the bubbly cyclops of the Rolex’s. That’s why I have a very simple submariner no-date. Patek has lots of entry level ugly watches too. But I favor its 5205-R. I think it’s prettier than any of the Rolex. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homo Faber Posted January 9 Share #12 Posted January 9 (edited) vor 38 Minuten schrieb Elliot Harper: That’s why I have a very simple submariner no-date. Rolex Submariner - the watch for gentlemen who have the people's best interest at heart...😂 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited January 9 by Homo Faber Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/418460-leica-miami-best-selling-list-does-not-include-m-cameras-up-to-4-on-list/?do=findComment&comment=5736844'>More sharing options...
SrMi Posted January 9 Share #13 Posted January 9 56 minutes ago, Al Brown said: B&H has stock. Of Pateks? Impossible! 😂 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee S Posted January 9 Share #14 Posted January 9 (edited) 1 hour ago, SrMi said: A flagship camera is never a bestseller. 1 hour ago, costa43 said: It could also come down to the fact that the M is now rather ridiculously priced at nearly 10 grand for the body. My view is these are the two reasons for lower sales. 10k for a rangefinder is getting bonkers. Edited January 9 by Lee S 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted January 9 Author Share #15 Posted January 9 It could also be attributed to the high M prices and the fact that Leica could not solve the freezing issues for a few years causing many to forego the M11 entirely. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted January 9 Author Share #16 Posted January 9 Also look at #10 on the list . A regular M11 and in stock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RexGig0 Posted January 9 Share #17 Posted January 9 (edited) Some thoughts: With M cameras often being shown as “Out of Stock,” I am thinking that Leica Store Miami is selling as many M cameras as Leica USA allocates to them. Assembling and calibrating a rangefinder is a quite complex task, so, it would make sense, to me, that Leica produces fewer M cameras than Q cameras. I have no access to the relevant statistics, or information on the demographics of the typical Q-series, but, not many photographers are willing to settle for manual-focus cameras, so, i am not suprised to see an indication that there is high demand for Q cameras. I have two Nikon D5 cameras, Nikon’s “flagship” camera body, at the time that I bought them, in 2018 and 2019. (At the time, my wife and I were thinking about doing some serious traveling, to photograph birds and wildlife.) Only a select few Nikon dealers would stock the D5, because each of the other Nikon DSLR, except perhaps the quirky Df, out-sold the D5, during its production cycle. A “flagship” or “halo” product does tend to be sold in limited quantities. Personally, I may only ever buy one new Leica M camera, that being my M10, purchased in April 2018, from Houston Camera Exchange, an official Leica dealer. Nothing digital will endure forever, but, Leica M cameras are quite sturdy. I have ordered new Leica accessories from Leica Store Miami. Edited January 9 by RexGig0 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markey Posted January 9 Share #18 Posted January 9 52 minutes ago, Lee S said: My view is these are the two reasons for lower sales. 10k for a rangefinder is getting bonkers. I would imagine that the manufacturing costs are now disproportionate . Old technology eventually becomes expensive in comparative terms plus the user base has probably been eroded considerably too. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee S Posted January 9 Share #19 Posted January 9 8 minutes ago, Markey said: I would imagine that the manufacturing costs are now disproportionate . Old technology eventually becomes expensive in comparative terms plus the user base has probably been eroded considerably too. Good points, especially user base. Genuine question, is the rangefinder really a mechanical masterpiece that’s hard to manufacture though? The mechanism is unchanged from the M10 so no further R&D costs or tooling costs to amortise. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WenckebachMD Posted January 9 Share #20 Posted January 9 Flagships are rarely best sellers. The M is the definitive Leica, but it has the least commercial appeal. The Q and SL are exponentially more user and professional friendly, the SL has just as powerful a lens ecosystem and has more appeal for professional use. Makes sense that they don't sell 9 thousand dollar manual focus only bodies the way the 6500 dollar or less autofocus ones do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now