Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I normally want to only use mechanical shutter. However if I decide to shoot, say daylight, at f1.4 and need a faster shutter than the max 1/2000 mechanical shutter, would I best keep the camera set to hybrid shutter and then on the shutter dial set it to A?

Link to post
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, brickftl said:

I normally want to only use mechanical shutter. However if I decide to shoot, say daylight, at f1.4 and need a faster shutter than the max 1/2000 mechanical shutter, would I best keep the camera set to hybrid shutter and then on the shutter dial set it to A?

That's what i do personally but better avoid shooting moving subject matters this way, at least in theory. In practice, i've never got rolling shutter issues so far but i'm no beta tester.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's rubbish for anything moving at pace. I didn't have a second go at this and forgot to take the camera off hybrid before I shot. 1/5000s (tour of Norway first stage)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Derbyshire Man
Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously worse the closer the subject and it seems the closer to the edge of the frame.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Tried with my grandchildren to no avail so far.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Derbyshire Man said:

It's rubbish for anything moving at pace. I didn't have a second go at this and forgot to take the camera off hybrid before I shot. 1/5000s (tour of Norway first stage)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Yes this will bother any photography geek but in real life ( which is not on a photo forum 😂) nobody will be bothered. In fact, I think it adds a sense of dynamics 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, jaapv said:

Yes this will bother any photography geek but in real life ( which is not on a photo forum 😂) nobody will be bothered. In fact, I think it adds a sense of dynamics 

I agree with that! It's just a different effect of speed with as much creative potential as anything else.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know. Maybe it's OK for the consumption by the general public. But it would drive me crazy.

Like when wheels seem to go backwards in a movie because they're interacting with the motion picture camera shutter. I can't not see it...

The horizontal focal plane shutter effect is a little easier to take, more so than the effect under discussion here, at least in terms of suggesting motion...

I do appreciate the blurred background effect when panning with a subject. 

Just one OCD Old Dude's opinion...

Edited by DadDadDaddyo
Amendment
Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Derbyshire Man said:

I agree with that! It's just a different effect of speed with as much creative potential as anything else.

Yes. Photography is a language of symbols. Bokeh symbolizes distance, high key abstraction, motion blur movement, high contrast force, unsharpness romance, etc. Those who speak it well can create a poem. This ES distortion is a symbol of aggression. 
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends, to me it looks forceful. But then I am a person who does not expect a photograph to be carbon copy of reality, it should be an interpretation of reality. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jaapv said:

Depends, to me it looks forceful. But then I am a person who does not expect a photograph to be carbon copy of reality, it should be an interpretation of reality. 

Pictures I used to take, while still working for a living, were expected to be a carbon copy of reality. I agree with you that other types of photography are interpretations and that is good.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, jdlaing said:

Pictures I used to take, while still working for a living, were expected to be a carbon copy of reality. I agree with you that other types of photography are interpretations and that is good.

Was it forensics/crime scene that you did? I suspect you’d have been fine with the electronic shutter for that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Derbyshire Man said:

Was it forensics/crime scene that you did? I suspect you’d have been fine with the electronic shutter for that!

No sir. Engineering and Architectural problems. Things not completed on time or incorrectly. Infrastructure projects wrong or incomplete, etc etc. They were used in court and in contract disputes. Mostly federal government the last 6 years before I retired. I was the regional manager for inspections and safety.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...