don daniel Posted October 28 Share #1141 Posted October 28 Advertisement (gone after registration) vor 5 Stunden schrieb CDodkin: The new option seems to be a poor work wound instead of fixing the actual WB. You have a fixed offset, yet a variable magenta tint depending on conditions. So maybe you get a closer WB, but it's still not accurate. You can keep promoting white balance with the Expodisc. That’s certainly not something I’ll be doing in my daily work. The M11 now has, thanks to the new firmware and its settings options, a white balance that’s just as reliable and configurable as that of other camera brands. Of course, I think it would make sense for Leica to choose a more neutral base calibration for the next model. And did it really have to take this long before the issue was finally addressed? That’s a fair question. But at this point, nitpicking about how it turned out seems overly critical to me. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 28 Posted October 28 Hi don daniel, Take a look here Leica M11 -purplish tint ???. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Photoworks Posted October 28 Share #1142 Posted October 28 5 hours ago, CDodkin said: The new option seems to be a poor work wound instead of fixing the actual WB. You have a fixed offset, yet a variable magenta tint depending on conditions. So maybe you get a closer WB, but it's still not accurate. Why is there one correct setting? break the rules and be creative! In any case, I have no idea why people refuse to edit the photos to taste. Leaving so much potential behind from the DNG files. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 8 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/384897-leica-m11-purplish-tint/?do=findComment&comment=5884606'>More sharing options...
CDodkin Posted October 29 Share #1143 Posted October 29 4 hours ago, Photoworks said: Why is there one correct setting? break the rules and be creative! In any case, I have no idea why people refuse to edit the photos to taste. Leaving so much potential behind from the DNG files. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! I have no issue with editing to taste - I do want to start from a neutral starting position however Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDodkin Posted October 29 Share #1144 Posted October 29 5 hours ago, don daniel said: You can keep promoting white balance with the Expodisc. That’s certainly not something I’ll be doing in my daily work. The M11 now has, thanks to the new firmware and its settings options, a white balance that’s just as reliable and configurable as that of other camera brands. Of course, I think it would make sense for Leica to choose a more neutral base calibration for the next model. And did it really have to take this long before the issue was finally addressed? That’s a fair question. But at this point, nitpicking about how it turned out seems overly critical to me. Not nit picking - pointing out they didn't actually fix the problem, (as people are stating), they just put a band-aid on it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDodkin Posted October 29 Share #1145 Posted October 29 9 hours ago, Steve Ash said: That is an unproven statement. You can be correct or utterly wrong. 3 years of research with the M11 gives me all the data to prove it's a variable magenta tint issue - experience vs opinion Steve 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Ash Posted Wednesday at 07:24 AM Share #1146 Posted Wednesday at 07:24 AM vor 6 Stunden schrieb CDodkin: 3 years of research with the M11 gives me all the data to prove it's a variable magenta tint issue - experience vs opinion Steve The question is if there is really a perfekt WB for lighting scenarios. I tend to follow Jaapv's view. I want to see real colors as my eyes perceive them in standard lighting such as daylight, defined artifical lights. In this respect i find the offering of Leica to apply one offset very reasonable. Regarding varying offsets i am also not sure if this might not even depends of the individual response of the viewing person. That is impossible to provide. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M11 for me Posted Wednesday at 07:32 AM Share #1147 Posted Wednesday at 07:32 AM Advertisement (gone after registration) vor 6 Stunden schrieb CDodkin: they just put a band-aid on it Note that many users and photographers are very happy with the actual AWB. Skin tones come out great. For post processing you can create your private import profile (what you certainly know very well) so that you get the requested neutral starting position. Just do it. An example: When I got my Q3 some years ago I did not like its AWB as it was too green (my personal taste). I created that personal import profile so that the imported images look like the ones out of the M11. Since then that issue is forgotten. I import images from the Q3 and they look like the ones from the M11. I do not think about it any more. Leica indeed would "calibrate" your camera if you wish to have it calibrated. Yes, they do it. A few users here reported about satisfying results. But as you can expect: At the end, what Leica sent back as "calibrated", is a bit this or bit that. It's a never ending thing. So whatever you wish to get as a customer Leica gave you in the past. Just one thing they did not do: They did not change the basic and original AWB. There are too many users out there that are quite against that. And now you have that new feature in the settings: Create your own neutral starting point straight in the camera. Others did it long ago with their import profile. 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
don daniel Posted Wednesday at 07:38 AM Share #1148 Posted Wednesday at 07:38 AM vor 6 Stunden schrieb CDodkin: Not nit picking - pointing out they didn't actually fix the problem, (as people are stating), they just put a band-aid on it On what personal experience is this assessment based, that the problem is not solved? For years, I have criticized the M11’s white balance. I now consider the problem solved. In different lighting situations, I am getting very good results with both AWB and the fixed settings: The magenta cast is a thing of the past. For me, this matter is settled. 6 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakontil Posted Wednesday at 07:59 AM Share #1149 Posted Wednesday at 07:59 AM 7 hours ago, CDodkin said: Not nit picking - pointing out they didn't actually fix the problem, (as people are stating), they just put a band-aid on it Of course they could make it permanent fix by not letting users to customize it, end of story but they didnt, instead they give options.. cant always make everyone happy but im sure majority will justified 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenykepesz Posted Wednesday at 12:42 PM Share #1150 Posted Wednesday at 12:42 PM (edited) vor 5 Stunden schrieb M11 for me: Note that many users and photographers are very happy with the actual AWB. Skin tones come out great. same here. vor 5 Stunden schrieb don daniel: For years, I have criticized the M11’s white balance. I now consider the problem solved. In different lighting situations, I am getting very good results with both AWB and the fixed settings: i fully agree with you both on the skin color - i am frequently just amazed how my M11-D + AWB + newest FW manages under the most differing circumstances cranking out skin tones that just feel right on my color calibrated monitor. it's even better if i leave it alone because i then usually would just screw up the photo temperature in one or the other direction... Edited Wednesday at 12:44 PM by fenykepesz 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDodkin Posted Wednesday at 01:00 PM Share #1151 Posted Wednesday at 01:00 PM 5 hours ago, Steve Ash said: The question is if there is really a perfekt WB for lighting scenarios. I tend to follow Jaapv's view. I want to see real colors as my eyes perceive them in standard lighting such as daylight, defined artifical lights. In this respect i find the offering of Leica to apply one offset very reasonable. Regarding varying offsets i am also not sure if this might not even depends of the individual response of the viewing person. That is impossible to provide. Neutral WB is not impossible Steve - the camera is fully capable of providing it with a calibrated target and in-camera WB Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDodkin Posted Wednesday at 01:02 PM Share #1152 Posted Wednesday at 01:02 PM 5 hours ago, M11 for me said: Note that many users and photographers are very happy with the actual AWB. Skin tones come out great. For post processing you can create your private import profile (what you certainly know very well) so that you get the requested neutral starting position. Just do it. An example: When I got my Q3 some years ago I did not like its AWB as it was too green (my personal taste). I created that personal import profile so that the imported images look like the ones out of the M11. Since then that issue is forgotten. I import images from the Q3 and they look like the ones from the M11. I do not think about it any more. Leica indeed would "calibrate" your camera if you wish to have it calibrated. Yes, they do it. A few users here reported about satisfying results. But as you can expect: At the end, what Leica sent back as "calibrated", is a bit this or bit that. It's a never ending thing. So whatever you wish to get as a customer Leica gave you in the past. Just one thing they did not do: They did not change the basic and original AWB. There are too many users out there that are quite against that. And now you have that new feature in the settings: Create your own neutral starting point straight in the camera. Others did it long ago with their import profile. Using post processing as described to 'fix' the issue, is again applying a fixed offset to a variable tint problem - so no it doesn't address the problem, because the amount of magenta tint varies depending on the lighting conditions when the photo was taken. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDodkin Posted Wednesday at 01:05 PM Share #1153 Posted Wednesday at 01:05 PM 5 hours ago, don daniel said: On what personal experience is this assessment based, that the problem is not solved? For years, I have criticized the M11’s white balance. I now consider the problem solved. In different lighting situations, I am getting very good results with both AWB and the fixed settings: The magenta cast is a thing of the past. For me, this matter is settled. If applying a fixed magenta offset was all that was required, we could all have done this is post processing 3 years ago, and the issue would have been settled. But we couldn't do that, because the magenta variance changes depending on the lighting conditions at the time of the shot. So explain to me how a fixed offset in the camera fixes the problem. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDodkin Posted Wednesday at 01:06 PM Share #1154 Posted Wednesday at 01:06 PM 5 hours ago, jakontil said: Of course they could make it permanent fix by not letting users to customize it, end of story but they didnt, instead they give options.. cant always make everyone happy but im sure majority will justified I'm talking about fixing the AWB to be more accurate in the camera - not fixing the magenta tint offset Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
don daniel Posted Wednesday at 01:55 PM Share #1155 Posted Wednesday at 01:55 PM vor 46 Minuten schrieb CDodkin: I'm talking about fixing the AWB to be more accurate in the camera - not fixing the magenta tint offset I do not have to explain that. I have adjusted the white balance pre-setting in my M11 and I use it. Did you try with yours? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDodkin Posted Wednesday at 02:19 PM Share #1156 Posted Wednesday at 02:19 PM (edited) 27 minutes ago, don daniel said: I do not have to explain that. I have adjusted the white balance pre-setting in my M11 and I use it. Did you try with yours? Yep - and I'll be sticking with doing in-camera WB with a target as before. Expected you wouldn't be able to explain why an offset works now, when it didn't before - thanks for making my point for me. Edited Wednesday at 02:24 PM by CDodkin 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedaes Posted Wednesday at 02:20 PM Share #1157 Posted Wednesday at 02:20 PM 1 hour ago, CDodkin said: we could all have done this is post processing 3 years ago, I thought we had. It was an easy tweak but still nice to be able to tweak in camera. People wanted Leica to address the 'magenta tint' in camera. Leica have done this with a very elegant solution. But somehow we can continue complain. Really? 2 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDodkin Posted Wednesday at 02:27 PM Share #1158 Posted Wednesday at 02:27 PM 3 minutes ago, pedaes said: I thought we had. It was an easy tweak but still nice to be able to tweak in camera. People wanted Leica to address the 'magenta tint' in camera. Leica have done this with a very elegant solution. But somehow we can continue complain. Really? Unfortunately it wasn't an 'easy tweak' - because the magenta offset kept changing depending on the conditions/location when the photo was taken. That's why this thread is still alive in October 2025. I get that everyone want's to press the 'easy button' - and I applaud Leica for at least making a token effort to placate their M11 owners. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedaes Posted Wednesday at 02:37 PM Share #1159 Posted Wednesday at 02:37 PM 4 minutes ago, CDodkin said: it wasn't an 'easy tweak' It was on a calibrated screen! What is the issue.? What is different to adjusting exposure, shadows, contrast etc etc. It is just another slider, there to use to achieve the look you want in your print. 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDodkin Posted Wednesday at 07:43 PM Share #1160 Posted Wednesday at 07:43 PM (edited) 5 hours ago, pedaes said: It was on a calibrated screen! What is the issue.? What is different to adjusting exposure, shadows, contrast etc etc. It is just another slider, there to use to achieve the look you want in your print. A calibrated screen doesn't effect the WB tint offset changing depending on the shooting conditions - you seem confused as to what's changing and when. Edited Wednesday at 07:44 PM by CDodkin 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now