Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

After my son got caught by SD failure (no valid image), I suddenly think dual SD  slot should be essential for all digital cameras, including low end P&S.

At least in all Leica. After all, no Leica is low end. 

Edited by Einst_Stein
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Einst_Stein changed the title to All Leica should have Dual SD slots
x

What did your son see when he checked images on his LCD from the beginning of his shooting? (I assume something was visible to him?) Did he have and use a spare card?

If he was travelling, at what stage did he realise that he had a problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

All cameras are compromises with something missed out for weight, cost or other reasons. In a consumer camera (most cameras) I am happy not to have an extra slot. I have never had a card failure in-camera since I went digital around 2001.

 

Q. What camera and card was it? Had the card been used without problems before?

Edited by LocalHero1953
Link to post
Share on other sites

When the photography is being paid for by a client and not repeatable in the event of a catastrophe, I would not use a camera without dual card slots or enough internal memory to cover me.

In the last 24 years I've had one early days 1gb microdrive fail and one Lexar cf card fail.  Not a high number by any means, but enough to put some value on in-camera backup.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wda said:

I had two backs for my Hasselbad then.

So did I - but generally with different films in them. And unless you shot everything twice they didn't help save images either.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have dual slots in the medium format cameras, but not in the Ms -and do a lot of work with them too-.  Yes, it is a risk. I travel with a laptop and save images from the cameras every evening.  But said that, so far I have never lost information on a card, but I have lost a full external drive -a Lacie- once. i was able to recover the files but it cost me a fortune.  Since then, I keep a NAS, and a backup storage in Azure. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, lct said:

I'd rather have an internal SSD a-la-M11.

Im in the other camp for a few reasons. First I hate cables to begin with and with the latest usb garbage there are too many variants. Much happier to just pull the card and stuff in the MBP slot.  The other thing is related to failure. Yes, cards fail as well, but they're replaceable and at increasingly lower cost as time goes on. SSDs have a limited number of write cycles.  If the internal mem is of the highest quality, nothing to worry about for a very long time, but if not, if could fail after a few years. 

Edited by Tailwagger
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Never had failed card in camera. Since 2003.

Had few crappy cards which propagated their quality by purchasing place and price.

For those who needs two, here is SL series.

Pushing two cards readers into M and Q is not realistic. Those cameras meant to be tiny. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Dual slots maybe, but incorporate an CF Express Type A card holder that is backward compatible with SD cards just as the Sony A7S III does.  CF Express technology is superior to SD technology, but at a price.

https://alphauniverse.com/stories/quick-guide-to-memory-cards-for-video-with-the-sony-a7s-iii/#:~:text=The Sony Alpha 7S III has dual card slots that,and frame rates in camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...