Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

3 hours ago, darkspark said:

The new 50lux with the new M11 Mono

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

It looks a bit shorter than its predecessor, doesn't it? Length has always been one of my main complaints. The filter makes it look longer though. And it's a bit odd that they use one in the promotional images, since Leica has always discouraged the use of filters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 314
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

3 hours ago, evikne said:

It looks a bit shorter than its predecessor, doesn't it? Length has always been one of my main complaints. The filter makes it look longer though. And it's a bit odd that they use one in the promotional images, since Leica has always discouraged the use of filters.

Could that be a yellow filter? Maybe because it’s an M Monochrom they show the lens with filter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Marckyokay said:

Could that be a yellow filter? Maybe because it’s an M Monochrom they show the lens with filter.

It could be. But I think it spoils the impression of the lens a bit, almost like having a picture of a new sports car with a roof rack. 😄

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, evikne said:

It could be. But I think it spoils the impression of the lens a bit, almost like having a picture of a new sports car with a roof rack. 😄

Yeah, that's true. 
Maybe these leaks won't be the first official pictures of the lens. 
Showing the lens off by itself without filter... Then later we will get this combination with the Monochrom and filter attached. Can't imagine they promote the lens with filter, these are just leaks originating from the pool of promo pictures.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, mediumformula said:

It looks wider than the current 50 Lux Asph.  The new one looks wider than the lens mount whereas the current 50 Lux barrel is the same width as the lens mount.   Personally, the only reason I could see wanting to update would be for a smaller, lighter 50 Lux. 

I find that new high performance Leica lenses are horribly fat and bigger. Leica was famous for its tiny and high-performing lenses, now its production is becoming a non-sense.

Me and many other would pay lot of money for stellar performance in small package but not for stellar performance in can-size lenses......every optical firm can build them, nowadays.

Heritage, pride and...Quality-Check are a bit lost, suddenly.

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sarav said:

I find that new high performance Leica lenses are horribly fat and bigger. Leica was famous for its tiny and high-performing lenses, now its production is becoming a non-sense.

Me and many other would pay lot of money for stellar performance in small package but not for stellar performance in can-size lenses......every optical firm can build them, nowadays.

Heritage, pride and...Quality-Check are a bit lost, suddenly.

In this case, the increased girth is a good sign:

I fell out with the current form 50mm Summilux ASPH as the helicoid proved over time to be too light weight to support smooth operation, given the weight of the front element group.

If the mechanics have been improved, my faith may be restored.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

To me, length is more important than thickness. And if it's correct that the dimensions are equal to the new 35mm Summilux FLE II (46mm), it is 6 mm shorter than its predecessor, and even 1 mm shorter than my 50mm Summilux pre-ASPH! And that sounds great!

Edited by evikne
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, derleicaman said:

The Black Chrome version of the Summilux is an off shoot of the lens I specified for the LHSA MP3 kit. The heavy brass lens body was Leica's way of accomplishing the "classic" look of the lens, based on the original Summilux 50 with its beautiful scalloped focusing ring. The LHSA and BC versions are much heavier than the original Summilux lens, and it is slightly larger than that lens as well. Until you hold the lens in your hand, you don't realize how heavy it is. The heavier mount also dampens the focusing action and enhances the feel as well, and this lens does not have the complaints in this regard that the original 50 Summilux ASPH has had. I have a BC version of the lens as well, and it is a lump to carry around! But look at the results you get with it, and the wonderful haptics, and it is well worth it!

I love the 35 Summicron M Asph Black Chrome and the 50 Summilux M Black Chrome for the reasons you state above.  Purchased both when they came out.

Edited by rsh
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FrozenInTime said:

In this case, the increased girth is a good sign:

I fell out with the current form 50mm Summilux ASPH as the helicoid proved over time to be too light weight to support smooth operation, given the weight of the front element group.

If the mechanics have been improved, my faith may be restored.

So true. Impossible to find a perfectly smoothly focusing current 50ASPH… all good and good-enough for operation, but with that heritage and price tag good-enough doesn’t feel right…

This will certainly be improved with the increased girth and improved engineering. But damn that older brass chrome version is a beauty and hard to sell 😂

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, evikne said:

To me, length is more important than thickness. And if it's correct that the dimensions are equal to the new 35mm Summilux FLE II (46mm), it is 6 mm shorter than its predecessor, and even 1 mm shorter than my 50mm Summilux pre-ASPH! And that sounds great!

Looking at the images mounted on the camera, it's the same diameter as the 35mm FLE II but longer. Measuring the length in the photo and converting to mm I get a length of 52.7mm. The current 50mm Summilix-M FLE lists as 53.5 long. Given errors in my measurements against a photo it's probably the same length or only around 1mm shorter than the current 50mm. However, it's quite a bit thicker (58mm vs 52.5mm) and I think that gives the illusion it's shorter in the photos.

Edited by mosh1
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, mosh1 said:

Looking at the images mounted on the camera, it's the same diameter as the 35mm FLE II but longer. Measuring the length in the photo and converting to mm I get a length of 52.7mm. The current 50mm Summilix-M FLE lists as 53.5 long. Given errors in my measurements against a photo it's probably the same length or only around 1mm shorter than the current 50mm. However, it's quite a bit thicker (58mm vs 52.5mm) and I think that gives the illusion it's shorter in the photos.

This poster says it has a similar design and size as the Summilux-M 35 f/1.4 ASPH (FLE II), which it is stated to have a length of 46 mm. But I look forward to getting the final answer at the launch in a few days.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by evikne
Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, evikne said:

This poster says it has a similar design and size as the Summilux-M 35 f/1.4 ASPH (FLE II), which it is stated to have a length of 46 mm. But the exact dimensions remain to be seen at the launch in a few days.

 

Here's a comparison pic I did against the 35mm FLE II (sized so the bayonet mounts are the same). I think this will be accurate, it will be the same length or maybe only 1mm shorter than the current 50mm FLE. Yes it is 'similar' but not the same.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by mosh1
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if this is the Apo-Summicron-SL-ification of the Summilux-M lens lineup, in the sense of a more highly standardised industrial design across the board for new 'lux-M lenses.

I just picked up a copy of the still-current 50'lux-M asph. last month, and I don't prefer this new style of industrial design if it is indeed going to become the standard for new lenses, particularly the loss of the ribbed focusing ring. This is in contrast, too, with the recent 35mm Apo-Summicron-M, which did have a nice ribbed focusing ring spanning almost the entire circumference of the lens (interrupted only by the tab), more like the still-current 50'lux asph.'s industrial design than either of the new updated Summilux-M lenses. Will be interesting to see what design decisions get made as more new lenses (and close-focusing updates of the rest of the current lineup) are released.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Added the current 50 FLE I in my comparison image. So 35MM FLE II, 50mm FLE II, 50MM FLE I. The new lens will weigh noticeably more.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mosh1 said:

Added the current 50 FLE I in my comparison image. So 35MM FLE II, 50mm FLE II, 50MM FLE I. The new lens will weigh noticeably more.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

I think "similar size" is a misleading expression of Leica if it does not mean "same size".

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mosh1 said:

Added the current 50 FLE I in my comparison image. So 35MM FLE II, 50mm FLE II, 50MM FLE I. The new lens will weigh noticeably more.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

that doesn’t look right. you should be able to resize the right lens so the mount is the same size as the others to get a proper in proportion image. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Nimar said:

that doesn’t look right. you should be able to resize the right lens so the mount is the same size as the others to get a proper in proportion image. 

I did do that, the mounts are the same width. The angle of the 50mm FLE I image is slightly different, but good enough for an approximation.

Edited by mosh1
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 22 Stunden schrieb evikne:

It could be. But I think it spoils the impression of the lens a bit, almost like having a picture of a new sports car with a roof rack. 😄

A protective filter is probably not a bad idea in the sandy desert (visible in the background).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Comparing MTF charts of FLE vs FLE II seems like the new one slightly sharper at  center but slightly less sharp from the middle of the frame.

Also, more fat body could result in more rounded bokeh balls at corners, as compared to cat's eye balls in current FLE version.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...