Jump to content

Recommended Posts

x

I was just looking at some files, having processed Lumix files (can't get more Japanese than that?), and noticed that:😏

My M240 out of camera colours are tending towards to the output of the S5 in tonality of the greens. Pleasant in all aspects.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

The DNG however is bland, and less nice in all aspects -

...The DNG blandness disappears once you push the 'develop' button in LRc (= auto exposure). Then it tends towards the OOC JPG.

here the 'developed' image:

 

So the question I have , is:

to what are we referring when we talk about "the Leica Colours"?

I'm happy with the M10-R,  but it takes time to learn the new colour and detail sensitivity. It is imho just like a new lens. It is sharper, has more contrast and a higher colour fidelity. You need to get acquainted how it draws. My personal dislike of many modern lenses is only the CA that is often high. Luckily sensors have only improvements.

Edited by Alberti
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Alberti said:

The bottom one is not too bad isn't it?

Depends if you want to show the reality or the way you see or remember it ;). Unless the mill is blue and black, I prefer what you call DNG which I find more natural but it's me :cool:. Is it your DNG file converted by Apple Preview? Just curious.

Edited by lct
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

The problem with this image is that the camera has picked up IR light. That makes the  grass too yellow, so you  (or LR) compensated by shifting the colour balance to cool, which, in turn, makes the windmill too blue. 

Which brings me  to the following brainflash: All M cameras have an IR component in their colour rendering (hence the skin tones complaints) but the M11 has the most effective IR filter of all. So the basic colour rendering shifts to neutral (more conform with other cameras with more effective IR filtering) and it has the best skin tones of all M cameras.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2022 at 1:18 AM, adan said:

The research suggests that there may be many possible influences on how color is perceived. Possibly with ethic, national-origin or geographical components - but also gender and language.

Just want to highlight this book by an Italian graphic designer, Chromorama

https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/316056/chromorama/9780241573792.html

It may be of some interest and it's somewhat related to this topic. It's not a technical manual, and it's a very enjoyable book. It's been available for a couple of years in Italian and Spanish, an English version is coming this November.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see now what you mean.

I had expected the M10-R also to have the new generation better IR-absorbing cover glass, but there is some Italian-flag left over in my 20mm Russar lens tho.

But maybe . .

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

(this m240 not m10-R but the content is  so nice) Nice green?

 

Edited by Alberti
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the correct white balance, taken from the white on the windmill. See what happens to the Greens? The sky is shifted to Cyan as well.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Adan; Of course language plays a part. Just from memory: Eskimo's have 25 words for the white of snow, to depict all stages, and others just don't see it, not even trappers.

There is even a difference between color and colour. [I prefer the first].

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take the one with the correct windmill and work on the greens, not too easy, either with the grading tool on a selection, or go into LAB and put two versions on a blending layer and split the sliders. IR contamination is a nightmare in colour processing.
I learned the hard way when on Safari with the M240 . Total and in some cases irrecoverable yellow casts- Quite a few B&W conversions... :( For the next trip IR filters all the way.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 1 Stunde schrieb Alberti:

 

There is even a difference between color and colour. [I prefer the first].

To me the first one has iPhone colors. So it is not surprising You like it best. Apple offers what we like and we are used to such colors. 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it is true the iMac screen sets our main viewer experience.

The windmill pictures are with an Canon 50mm LTM, I think that lens renders slightly cool too. Maybe in general the results are somewhat cool.

In the past I used C1, then the results of 'coloring in' were more variable , LR 6.14 gave me a stable environment; and I sort of like the LRc but I often reduce vibrancy (range of +6-+12 for both M240 and M10-R)  that it proposes. But again - against my screen as backplane.

Still the M10-R color scheme, which might look like the M11, is nice in its great tonality of colors, I dare not say 🤫, it has a great  micro-contrast.

Also it are  specifically the shadows which are very different for me. That in itself is interesting, because I perceive the shadows are not as 'cold' as the M240. Probably ditto the M11.

Many of the sample pictures I saw with the M11 in the beginning were like what Jaapv showed (imho post processed a little on the warm side, such as in the 'Ludwig' profile).

2 hours ago, lct said:

Is it your DNG file converted by Apple Preview? Just curious.

The posted file was made with LRc, without any changes. The profile that LRc gives out of the box is Adobe color.

-  I looked at the Preview rendering: that .dng is slightly cyan in the air and the green is a lot cooler.

It is a bad bad picture, as it is the shadow side of the mill. The sunny side is of course very different, the red of the 'keys' on the mill is well detailed then.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
On 6/6/2022 at 4:23 PM, Adam Bonn said:

Yeah definitely my lexicon there 😅

Here's what I mean

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

M10 (left) and M9

Same exposure settings both AWB and completely unedited for the purposes of this comparison (cos y'know I edit pictures normally!)

M9 image is lighter and more blue. (M10 is darker and more yellow) ergo in my speak more light and sparkly

 

Not bad for a 13 years old camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...