Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

9 hours ago, labyrinth said:

I do hardware design for drones and electronics repair as a hobby so if my m6ttl fails I will fix the board or try to redesign it with available components.

So are you going to arket a replacement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Leica could hide the battery of the MP somewhere under the base plate, they would easily sell for twice the present prices (black paint only of cause).

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Apochromat said:

If Leica could hide the battery of the MP somewhere under the base plate, they would easily sell for twice the present prices (black paint only of cause).

What are you smoking right now, I want some?

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 38 Minuten schrieb 250swb:

What are you smoking right now, I want some?

Smoke whatever you like, I don’t. I find it interesting, that one camera costing 10x more than an another model, which uses the same lenses and is perfectly suited to take the same photos, stops short of costing 20x as much, when minor design changes could make it look like models from the days of old.
Camera connaisseurs follow watch collectors and wine experts and observe carefully price decisions in these fields. 
Could I please kindly ask you to excuse me for ending the conversation with you, that you start with an insult?

Edited by Apochromat
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Apochromat said:

If Leica could hide the battery of the MP somewhere under the base plate, they would easily sell for twice the present prices (black paint only of cause).

I don't think the design change you're suggesting would warrant a 2x increase in MP prices, but I do agree that putting that 'wart' on the front of the camera did spoil some of its design elegance.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well let's see, my situation is an M2, M4-P, M6, and M7. I use Leica MR-4 meters on the M2, and M4-P. These are my favorite cameras, so I figure the M6 and M7 should last considering the low usage. In any case, I don't worry about circuit board failure, and the specter of non-repairability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 13 Minuten schrieb logan2z:

I don't think the design change you're suggesting would warrant a 2x increase in MP prices, but I do agree that putting that 'wart' on the front of the camera did spoil some of its design elegance.  

Add an M2 frame counter and a limited series of 0.58 and 0.85 viewfinders (which could follow demand, like the 1.4/50 Asph Vers. 2) …

Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Apochromat said:

Smoke whatever you like, I don’t. I find it interesting, that one camera costing 10x more than an another model, which uses the same lenses and is perfectly suited to take the same photos, stops short of costing 20x as much, when minor design changes could make it look like models from the days of old.
Camera connaisseurs follow watch collectors and wine experts and observe carefully price decisions in these fields. 
Could I please kindly ask you to excuse me for ending the conversation with you, that you start with an insult?

Why does hiding the battery in the baseplate equate to a doubling of the value? Unless you only fondle your camera. But putting the battery in the baseplate of a film M would be a nightmare with all the extra light seals necessary to change the battery if you were halfway through a film! Have you even half thought through what you just said?

Edited by 250swb
  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 250swb said:

But putting the battery in the baseplate of a film M would be a nightmare with all the extra light seals necessary to change the battery if you were halfway through a film! Have you even half thought through what you just said?

Yes, one of the most bizarre ideas I've read in this forum.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 11 Minuten schrieb wattsy:

Yes, one of the most bizarre ideas I've read in this forum.

What is of no interest for you does not have to be bizarre. 
There were many posts using your word of choice for a red Summicron 50mm Apo.

Leica owners differ.

Edited by Apochromat
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, johnwolf said:

My M6 is from 1966. To think its electronics could have been repaired till now is pretty amazing. 

If mine fails I'll continue to use it with no meter and no complaints. It's wonderful with and without.

John

I'd guess you mean 1986! 1n 1966 the M3 & M2 were still in production, and the M4 was still a year away. M6 began in 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Alan Siqueira said:

Did someone heard something from Leica itself? Last year I send them a e-mail and they just said that they can repair the M6 classic. I have a M6 TTL (  wich can't be repaired) but I guess thay don't have a problem with the classic model.

No, but two of the most respected independent Leica technicians, Don Goldberg in the US and Alan Starkie in the UK, have stated that the M6 Classic main circuit board is now no longer available (from 2022). But we all seem to have missed a key comment in Alan Starkie's announcement, which I've only just read:

'When we couldn't get hold of rangefinder prism components, we decided to buy into high vacuum technology so that we could fix them ourselves. This will eventually lead us to remanufacturing entire M3 prisms. When we couldn't get brightline masks, we reverse engineered them and made our own. You can't complain really. The first M6 was 1984 and circuit boards have only just become unavailable. That's nearly 40 years but these cameras have at least another 40 years life in them. For that reason I fully intend to redesign the metering and produce replacement circuit boards. I will make an announcement when the time comes. For the time being we will continue in our efforts to repair them.'

https://www.cameraworks-uk.com/post/is-your-leica-m6-slowly-becoming-an-m4-p-no-more-light-meter-pcb-s

Edited by Anbaric
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Alan Siqueira said:

Did someone heard something from Leica itself? Last year I send them a e-mail and they just said that they can repair the M6 classic. I have a M6 TTL (  wich can't be repaired) but I guess thay don't have a problem with the classic model.

DAG did (see the first post in this thread). Certainly a reliable source regarding Leica repair. And yes, last year there was no problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anbaric said:

No, but two of the most respected independent Leica technicians, Don Goldberg in the US and Alan Starkie in the UK, have stated that the M6 Classic main circuit board is now no longer available (from 2022). But we all seem to have missed a key comment in Alan Starkie's announcement, which I've only just read:

'When we couldn't get hold of rangefinder prism components, we decided to buy into high vacuum technology so that we could fix them ourselves. This will eventually lead us to remanufacturing entire M3 prisms. When we couldn't get brightline masks, we reverse engineered them and made our own. You can't complain really. The first M6 was 1984 and circuit boards have only just become unavailable. That's nearly 40 years but these cameras have at least another 40 years life in them. For that reason I fully intend to redesign the metering and produce replacement circuit boards. I will make an announcement when the time comes. For the time being we will continue in our efforts to repair them.'

https://www.cameraworks-uk.com/post/is-your-leica-m6-slowly-becoming-an-m4-p-no-more-light-meter-pcb-s

And before anyone asks, it looks like he may also be interested in doing this for the TTL:

'My approach is this, re-design the whole thing and remanufacture them. I'm already working on this. I might also think about the TTL version too and include adjustment pots like the M6, avoiding the need to hook the camera up to a Leica computer just for adjustment.'

https://www.rangefinderforum.com/node/4782210?p=4785021#post4785021

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...