Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, jaapv said:

You may well be right. However, it does not take away my objection that they pretend to measure the sensor, give camera output measurements instead and that their ratings have little value for real-life photography unless the measurements are translated by somebody like Bill Claff.

A high "DXO rating" is a marketing tool.

I do not find any type of scoring useful, be it DPR or DXO. DXO's measurements can be useful, IMO. It is complementary to P2P.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SrMi said:

Yes,4 years ago.

About the same amount of time it takes DXO Labs to get hold of certain Leica gear for testing and profiling.  (And never for Monochroms.)  Not very impressed with either company.

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SrMi said:

I do not find any type of scoring useful, be it DPR or DXO. DXO's measurements can be useful, IMO. It is complementary to P2P.

P2P interprets DXO data for his own graphs. I think some may suspect that I am not really interested in scoring too ;) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jaapv said:

P2P interprets DXO data for his own graphs. I think some may suspect that I am not really interested in scoring too ;) 

Most of P2P measurements are independent of DXO. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, jaapv said:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

The note says that in cases where P2P did not conduct measurements (missing camera data), one can use the graphs derived from DXO's data instead.

Bill Claff conducts measurements on data provided by others (not DXO). I have provided Bill with data for several of the cameras shown in P2P. Anything derived from DXO is clearly marked as such.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have always found these ratings to be about as useful as comparing cars by measuring which falls faster when dropped off a cliff. Does anyone really believe that the sensor in the Pentax 645Z sensor from 2014 is better than every sensor since 2014 (except 2016's Hasselblad X1D)?  I am not saying the information is "wrong", just that it has only passing relation to any useful aspect of a camera. It does not account for how the camera is designed, the sensor size, resolution, what the color is like, or pretty much anything that actually dictates whether a camera is worth buying.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, M11 for me said:

I understand: You are not a friend of DxO. I am.

The problem is they don't publish their methodology. I'm left to assume their methodology is so incredible they can't possibly let me read it lest my brain short-circuit. Or they don't have a methodology that would pass scientific scrutiny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the "Overall" and the "Portrait" scores are absolutely useless whereas "Landscape" and "Sport" are useful. For that you have to read the description of DxO. In all my posts above I actually referred to these two measurements. The fact that the M11 is on top is still great. I love my M11 even more 🥰

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Stuart Richardson said:

I have always found these ratings to be about as useful as comparing cars by measuring which falls faster when dropped off a cliff. Does anyone really believe that the sensor in the Pentax 645Z sensor from 2014 is better than every sensor since 2014 (except 2016's Hasselblad X1D)?  I am not saying the information is "wrong", just that it has only passing relation to any useful aspect of a camera. It does not account for how the camera is designed, the sensor size, resolution, what the color is like, or pretty much anything that actually dictates whether a camera is worth buying.

Yes, the IQ of sensor in 645z, X1DII, and GFX50 (all have the same sensor) is considered better than in any FF sensor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, analog-digital said:

What does sports have to do with low light? Apart from in the hall (inside by NO light)?

My guess: both sport (high shutter speed) and low light require high ISO.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does sport in general require a high shutter speed? Admittedly many do, but I can think of plenty less speedy sports, from archery to chess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jaapv said:

Why does sport in general require a high shutter speed? Admittedly many do, but I can think of plenty less speedy sports, from archery to chess.

Speed chess? 😂

  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FlashGordonPhotography said:

When did Chess become a sport? It’s a game. Next thing solitaire re will be an extreme event.

Gordon

 

Ask that of any chess master. Competing by mind is as much sport as competing by body. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...