Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

27 minutes ago, UliWer said:

I fear, a long list with lenses containing this or that material does not add much to the topic of this thread.

 

in a way i think it does, because in my opinion, their rendering is quite nice..

and its good to have an idea before holding one of these lenses upto an eye to look for dust/scratches etc ;)

Edited by frame-it
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
x
  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

On 2/6/2022 at 4:54 AM, LocalHero1953 said:

That's the question - my starting point for Leica lenses is the wiki here, to be followed up elsewhere if necessary.

I am interested in:

  • Who made lenses in LTM
  • Compatibility e.g. rangefinder coupling
  • Performance: contrast, sharpness, vignetting, flaring

All advice welcome!

Manual search at RFF. They had huge info, but broken google search after bad forum engine update.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Another nice non-Leitz lens I have is a Minolta Super Rokkor 45mm f2.8

Originally made for the Minolta 35, it is Leica screw, rangefinder coupled and takes regular A36 size filters/hoods. It is only a fraction larger than a 35mm f3.5 Summaron and seems just as good. Mine came from West Yorkshire Cameras.

Info about them here https://www.canonrangefinder.org/Minolta_lenses.htm

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Edited by Pyrogallol
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I like these non-Leitz lenses in chrome with the A36 filter/hood size - they match the Leica bodies and lenses well.
With three bodies, I would like a 28mm to go with the 35mm Nikkor and 5cm Elmars (three - each body came with one). Perhaps a Nikkor 28mm f/3.5, but they seem rarer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have two Canon 28mm lenses, the f3.5 and f2.8 but not the Nikon version. Neither of the Canons are A36.

Details on the same Canon site as the Rokkor.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Pyrogallol
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

On 2/19/2022 at 2:04 PM, LocalHero1953 said:

I have just bought a first non-Leica LTM lens: W-Nikkor.C 35mm f/2.5. It should arrive next week.
The Elmar 5cm are nice, but I often prefer 35mm or 28mm.

Just arrived - a little gem!

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Pyrogallol said:

Looks to be in very nice condition and with the front cap. Only 477 away from my serial number.

This one has the 'E.P' mark (but not 'MIOJ') - does yours? And do you have a year for yours? Photosynthesis lists it just as 'July 1952 - '

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine does not have either marking. According to Rotoloni’s “The Complete Nikon Rangefinder System” the 35mm f2.5 came out in September 1952 so do not normally have the mioj marking as the official US occupation of Japan was ending. His book is mainly about the Nikon S bayonet cameras and lenses and Leica thread lenses are just mentioned where they occur. You have to try and fit your serial number lenses into the batches they seem to have been produced in. So these ones look to around 1952 to 58?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pyrogallol said:

Mine does not have either marking. According to Rotoloni’s “The Complete Nikon Rangefinder System” the 35mm f2.5 came out in September 1952 so do not normally have the mioj marking as the official US occupation of Japan was ending. His book is mainly about the Nikon S bayonet cameras and lenses and Leica thread lenses are just mentioned where they occur. You have to try and fit your serial number lenses into the batches they seem to have been produced in. So these ones look to around 1952 to 58?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Yes, it looks difficult to tie it down any closer than that period. The other online sources I've found (Pacific Rim and Mir) are no more specific.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Pyrogallol said:

Mine does not have either marking. According to Rotoloni’s “The Complete Nikon Rangefinder System” the 35mm f2.5 came out in September 1952 so do not normally have the mioj marking as the official US occupation of Japan was ending. His book is mainly about the Nikon S bayonet cameras and lenses and Leica thread lenses are just mentioned where they occur. You have to try and fit your serial number lenses into the batches they seem to have been produced in. So these ones look to around 1952 to 58?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

any chance of taking a pic & posting the page on the 28mm LTM W-Nikkor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my recently acquired 28mm Nikkor LTM

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, romualdo said:

any chance of taking a pic & posting the page on the 28mm LTM W-Nikkor?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Off the topic, but it is interesting Nikon had to use a third party L-Z adapter to take the photos even though the camera and lens are both Nikon products.  Even the F lens to Z camera adapter (FTZ) had limited functionality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/19/2022 at 7:25 PM, Pyrogallol said:

I have two Canon 28mm lenses, the f3.5 and f2.8 but not the Nikon version. Neither of the Canons are A36.

Details on the same Canon site as the Rokkor.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

How do you find the Canon 28mm f/3.5 compared to the Nikon 28mm f/3.5?

Edit: sorry, misread your post - I see you don't have the Nikon. But would appreciate the comments of anyone who does!

Edited by LocalHero1953
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...