Jump to content

Any problem with my M240 + Summilux 35mm 1.4 ASPH FLE? (strong vignetting)


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi all!

First of all, I'm a newbie in digital Leica, only shoot film with my M6 for a few years.

I've purchased a lovely 240 with the Summilux 35mm 1.4 ASPH FLE version and I noticed too much vignetting in some images. Is this normal? I guess some is wrong in that configuration, lens is in mint condition and same body with other 50mm lens, for example Summmicron or Zeiss planar ZM, not happened. I've tried some differents configuration with Jpegs, spot metering, only DNG, DNG + fine Jpegs, etc with same results.

Thanks in advance...

Attahc some examples at f2 and f1.4.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the lens does have vignetting, especially at 1.4 (which is quite normal for this type of lens) but normally the in-camera profile will iron this out. Do you have lens recognition switched on?

In general: the shorter the focal length, the more vignetting. So it is not surprising that you 50 mm lenses are less pronounced.

 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jaapv said:

Yes, the lens does have vignetting, especially at 1.4 (which is quite normal for this type of lens) but normally the in-camera profile will iron this out. Do you have lens recognition switched on?

In general: the shorter the focal length, the more vignetting. So it is not surprising that you 50 mm lenses are less pronounced.

 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Yeap, but I've had some 1.4s and 1.2s  but I expected that to be a summilux asph and modern version, have less vignetting, even at 2.8 is very noticeable

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vignetting is optical, and depends on the size of the lens. If it must be constructed small, because of the view-rangefinder, there is no other compromise. If Leica had chosen for less vignetting, the lens would have been larger. No matter, it is the easiest thing in the world to correct in postprocessing.

If you look at the graph, it is still 50% at 2.8.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical example of camera not recognizing the lens 6bit code, see the color shift on corners and edges.

First check if lens detection is set to auto. If it is, it could be the 6bit reader isn't clean or the lens 6bit code need some cleaning. If the lens is in mint condition, it could be the camera problem? Worst case you just need to remember to manual select the correct profile in camera whenever you mount the lens.

Edited by Casey Jefferson
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

38 minutes ago, Casey Jefferson said:

Typical example of camera not recognizing the lens 6bit code, see the color shift on corners and edges.

First check if lens detection is set to auto. If it is, it could be the 6bit reader isn't clean or the lens 6bit code need some cleaning. If the lens is in mint condition, it could be the camera problem? Worst case you just need to remember to manual select the correct profile in camera whenever you mount the lens.

Set to auto but this copy doesn't have 6bit coded

36 minutes ago, jaapv said:

That could be exacerbating the issue. Does the lens show up in EXIF? Is lens recognition turned on?

Set in Auto, no a 6bit coded version.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Pablete said:

 

Set to auto but this copy doesn't have 6bit coded

Set in Auto, no a 6bit coded version.

Weird, all FLE should come with coding. Yours probably an older 35mm 1.4 ASPH (non-FLE). Set lens detection to manual and choose the correct lens.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Casey Jefferson said:

Weird, all FLE should come with coding. Yours probably an older 35mm 1.4 ASPH (non-FLE). Set lens detection to manual and choose the correct lens.

Yeap, its a Summilux 35.. 1.4 ASPH

Link to post
Share on other sites

All these short posts have the tremendous advantage that I have to read very little here. On the other hand I still have no answers to the most simple questions asked here to clarify what lens you have  🤢

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Which of these do you have? FLE (11663) to the left, pre-FLE (11874) to the right. 

All M lenses produced after July 2006 are 6-bit coded. The FLE was introduced in 2010. So if it's not 6-bit coded, you probably have the pre-FLE, or ASPH v1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, jaapv said:

But how come not coded?

So it is not the FLE but an older lens design.

 

3 hours ago, evikne said:

Which of these do you have? FLE (11663) to the left, pre-FLE (11874) to the right. 

All M lenses produced after July 2006 are 6-bit coded. The FLE was introduced in 2010. So if it's not 6-bit coded, you probably have the pre-FLE, or ASPH v1.

It's al older version, according with the serial number, It's a 1995 Summilux 35mm 1.4 apsh,  same to the right in picture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...