Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Would you like a Pancake M lens?
Not another Summarit looking like a poor man's Summicron. 
Not a backup or a clone to the old Summaron either. 
Just a pancake lens smaller than the CV 35/2.5 and capable to compete with the best 35/2.8 glass?
(Summarit-M 35/2.5 & Elmarit-C 40/2.8)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Summaron and I wouldn't want anything thinner. It's already difficult to focus with just having the little knob. Getting one's fingers onto the focusing collar is impossible. What would be the advantage of having something even smaller?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fotografr said:

What would be the advantage of having something even smaller?

Same as 80 years ago i guess ;)
(Elmar 35/3.5)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the CV35mm CS and the Summaron. Both great lenses, but they do require some handling. 

Would I get a Leica equivalent of the CV35mm - maybe, but I do love the rendering and colour of the VM one and the price point is hard to beat for something that often finds itself in a pocket just in case.

The 35mm 2.8 Summaron (I think @Keith (M) has one)  has always intrigued me for size too. Plenty sharp enough.....why not that for a remake? (I seem to recall it has been mooted for a remake?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tp2000 said:

I have the CV35mm CS and the Summaron. Both great lenses, but they do require some handling. 

Would I get a Leica equivalent of the CV35mm - maybe, but I do love the rendering and colour of the VM one and the price point is hard to beat for something that often finds itself in a pocket just in case.

The 35mm 2.8 Summaron (I think @Keith (M) has one)  has always intrigued me for size too. Plenty sharp enough.....why not that for a remake? (I seem to recall it has been mooted for a remake?)

Indeed I do. :)  An absolute jewel of a lens.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

15 hours ago, lct said:

Would you like a Pancake M lens?
Not another Summarit looking like a poor man's Summicron. 
Not a backup or a clone to the old Summaron either. 
Just a pancake lens smaller than the CV 35/2.5 and capable to compete with the best 35/2.8 glass?
(Summarit-M 35/2.5 & Elmarit-C 40/2.8)

Answer - yes, but ..... would digital sensors provide acceptable (to Leica) 'quality' given a lens path from a 35/50mm lens which has its exit pupil so close to the sensor as the 40mm Emarit-C I wonder? I suspect that this may be a problem, which is a pity. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pgk said:

Answer - yes, but ..... would digital sensors provide acceptable (to Leica) 'quality' given a lens path from a 35/50mm lens which has its exit pupil so close to the sensor as the 40mm Emarit-C I wonder? I suspect that this may be a problem, which is a pity. 

I don't know about the 40/2.8 but my Elmar 35/3.5 from 1948 is even smaller and can do that on the M240. (M240, Elmar 35/3.5, f/8, no lens profile, no vignetting nor color shift correction)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Edited by lct
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lct said:

I don't know about the 40/2.8 but my Elmar 35/3.5 from 1948 is even smaller and can do that on the M240. (M240, Elmar 35/3.5, f/8, no lens profile, no vignetting nor color shift correction

Whilst ypou might find the performance of a 1948 Elmar acceptable, I'm not sre that Leica would consider it up to their requirements of a modern design. I like the idea (and older lenses) though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perar 21/4.5 on M240.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica has spoiled me, I was a big fan of slr pancake lenses until trying Leica optics.  

LCT, your copy of the 35 elmar is much sharper than I believe my lens can render, the whole image is sharp.  My lens would be more impressionistic. 

Leica has small lenses but I wouldn't mind if they produce a line of tiny lenses.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, darylgo said:

Leica has spoiled me, I was a big fan of slr pancake lenses until trying Leica optics.  

LCT, your copy of the 35 elmar is much sharper than I believe my lens can render, the whole image is sharp.  My lens would be more impressionistic. 

Leica has small lenses but I wouldn't mind if they produce a line of tiny lenses.  

My Elmar 35/3.5 is a coated version. I pushed contrast in PP but did not apply extra sharpening. It is softer at wider apertures though. Now i'm pretty sure Leica could do much better with modern glass. Only problem is would real Leica men ;) be interested in a pancake lens...  

Link to post
Share on other sites

My copy of the lens is uncoated, the light bounces from optic to optic, front element to back element, round and round it goes ultimately arriving at the sensor with gauze like imagery.  Fortunately, I have little haze to stop all but a trace of  light transmission, nonetheless it is a magical lens and I am hoping to keep it until it's hundredth birthday.  

How does one graduate to be a "real Leica man"....is this a secret society?    

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would buy a 21-24 or 28 , fixed f/8 pancake lens, oh yeah. You forget about f/stops, you shoot zone focus and voila. Beautiful for my street photography - snapshots. The problem is that, AFAIK, you never get a superb IQ, it's never sharp enough ( I mean as any modern Leica lens at f/8).

But coming from DSLR, my 35/2.8 biogon looks a pancake compared 😆

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, mirekti said:

What is the focal lenght range that is pyhsically possible to make a pancake lens of and not to be slower than f/2.8?

If you mean in M or LTM mount, from 24mm (Aporia 24/2) to 40mm (Elmarit 40/2.8) i would say but i may be missing many ones. 

Edited by lct
Link to post
Share on other sites

I had Color Skopar 35 2.5 PII. It was next to pancake and still normal kind of handling lens. Except, every time I was checking aperture after few minutes, it was off :)  

Looking at images from MS-Optics M and Minitar-1 true pancakes, it tells me the same. Pancake and image quality are getting close @f8 and less.   

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 3/7/2021 at 10:56 PM, lct said:

Would you like a Pancake M lens?
Not another Summarit looking like a poor man's Summicron. 
Not a backup or a clone to the old Summaron either. 
Just a pancake lens smaller than the CV 35/2.5 and capable to compete with the best 35/2.8 glass?
....

Yes, compact 35/2.8 would be perfect for me 🙂 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...