Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi guys,

I am going to purchase my SL2 soon and very excited about it, been reading tons of stuff etc, but still couldn't decide if

it's better for me to go with the bundled 24 - 90mm lens or the 50mm lens (they are priced the same here) ? My work is mainly lifestyle photography and portrait (outdoor and studio settings). Thank you!

Edited by cumirebus
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a range of settings that you need to work in, you will find the 24-90 more flexible and excellent in quality.  Wait a bit and select some SL Summicrons later on.  They are much lighter and faster to work with than the SL 50/1.4.  I assume you are buying one or the other of the two SL lenses being offered as "kits" in order to avoid the import duties on German lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I switched from M system to SL system (would have loved to be able to keep both but that's for another time), with the 24-90. It is a fantastic lens, a real do-it-all-with-excellence. Bokeh is wonderfull in nearly all situations, AF is stuningly fast and deadly accurate. I love it! Would complement with a bright prime (SL50 1.4 surely... same filter size and a real gap between f3.5 and f1.4... seems more sexy in rendering than the Apo-Summicron-SL).

Check this guy's blog, he has very comprehensive reviews of SL system with the 50 mostly, make sure to explore the rest of his blog. I am not sure about what to think of the work but the user feedback is plethoric

 

http://findingrange.com/2019/08/29/leica-summilux-sl-50mm-f1-4-asph-lens-review/

 

Edited by Slender
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, scott kirkpatrick said:

If you have a range of settings that you need to work in, you will find the 24-90 more flexible and excellent in quality.  Wait a bit and select some SL Summicrons later on.  They are much lighter and faster to work with than the SL 50/1.4.  I assume you are buying one or the other of the two SL lenses being offered as "kits" in order to avoid the import duties on German lenses.

Totally agree. I have the 50 1.4, the 24-90 and the 35 and 90 Summicrons. The 24-90 is on the body 80% or more of the time. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would rather take the SL 16-35 and either the SL 75 or the SL 90. I don’t know if there are “bundles” for those lenses ...

For portrait the 90mm is famous and a classic. (And better than the 24-90). For most other things the 16-35 is smaller than the 24-90 and in my eyes of extraordinary quality. (Better than the 24-90). Excellent for landscape or travel, probably also for lifestyle. Great for indoor fotos, because it is wider.

You can still add a 1.4/50 later if you like.

Edited by caissa
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

vor 6 Stunden schrieb caissa:

I would rather take the SL 16-35 and either the SL 75 or the SL 90. I don’t know if there are “bundles” for those lenses ...

For portrait the 90mm is famous and a classic. (And better than the 24-90). For most other things the 16-35 is smaller than the 24-90 and in my eyes of extraordinary quality. (Better than the 24-90). Excellent for landscape or travel, probably also for lifestyle. Great for indoor fotos, because it is wider.

You can still add a 1.4/50 later if you like.

Totally agree. Due to the lack of OIS the 16-35 delivers higher optical performance than the 24-90...and due to the internal zooming it is much more compact (esp. when taking off the lens hood)...

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mediafotografie said:

no no no, just take the Summicron SL 35mm - it's the best lens of all and much more versatile than SL 50mm...

(ok, my own opinion, but Peter Karbe says the same)

 

😀

I agree it's the best, but that's not the option in the bundle offered by Leica recently. As I understand the OP is choosing between those two bundles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 8 Stunden schrieb mediafotografie:

no no no, just take the Summicron SL 35mm - it's the best lens of all and much more versatile than SL 50mm...

(ok, my own opinion, but Peter Karbe says the same)

 

😀

I have both SL35 & SL90 and honestly I can‘t see any difference between them (regarding their IQ)...😉.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Besides Peter Karbe is a not a photographer. I really like the man and the science he represents and I enjoy his presentation but oooh.... the "Why stop down" kills me. Cartier Bresson and the others at "f8 and be present" surely dont care for lenses that starts to show diffraction from f2.8 "because they are so good wide open why would you close it down". Sure they are great if you shoot everything at night from some meters away.... but I honestly believe that for a one lens bundle to start with the SL, it is hard to beat the 24-90 at its versatility. Sure for portrait the 90f2 would punch above in terms of sharpness, but you will spend more time fighting the shallow depth of field (if you choose to have eye lash #27 to #34 in focus... or throwing all this sharpness away in PS with the smooth skin tools 😅

 

😁 This doesnt apply to what are in my opinion his best creations: Summilux 50 (M and SL). Use it however you like. The Summilux 35 FLE feels botched in comparaison IMHO.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...