Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I was originally in the market for a 35mm, I went to the Leica store to buy a 35mm 1.4 or 1.2 nokton and a zeiss biogon 2.8 or 2.

but they didn't have any of those lenses in stock, however they had a 50mm summicron (that had been a store demo model) 1000 dollars off, so I took the chance and bought it.

However, upon getting it home, I've done some tests and it seems that there is back focus issues with it. It is worst at higher apertures, but it's also visible at f2.

Should I take it back, or is this to be expected with the summicrons?

Edited by Jacobjuul
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jacobjuul said:

Thanks guys. I guess my question is; is this the dealers responsibility to fix?

I would expect so but read the dealer's small print.  In-store demo lenses often get knocked around more than usual during their in-store life so the dealer might consider that your $1,000 discount was intended to cover any repair costs on a 'bought as seen' lens.  Dealers differ though so best of luck with your lens and dealer.

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of the "demo" classification the retail shop should get it repaired. There are consumer laws protecting one against such practices, at least in Australia there are. Take it back and get them to repair or get your money back. They probably dont know that the lens is out of whack.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is where a relationship with a good dealer is invaluable.I buy most of my Leica gear from the Leica Store in Manchester UK. In similar circumstances they would have sent my lens back to Leica for recalibration on a ASAP basis and in the meantime loaned me a lens .Not neccesarally the exact same model as thats not always possible but something to keep me shooting.Making friends with a good dealer is always a good thing.The customer is happy and so is the dealer with repeat business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am 25.12.2019 um 22:09 schrieb jaapv:

No, it is not to be expected, but it can be corrected.

What can the cause be? It is a pure mechanical problem. If the focus is ok at f/2 or f/2.4 , the higher apertures are not critical because of the depth of focus. Could it be a problem with the lubrication (demo item of the shop)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably the floating elements adjustment. The tolerances are exceedingly small and it is not unknown that a lens leaves the factory with this fault. It is especially visible at short focus distances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I propose we should first agree on the „names“ of the different „types“ of 50mm Summicrons:

The present version may be called the „fourth“, since it is the fourth optical design.

Very often here it is called the „fifth“ to make a difference between the earlier version with separate push-on hood and the present version with inbuilt hood. Both versions have the same optical design which was introduced in 1979. 

So when the thread opener calls it „type 5“ he may well mean this last version with inbuilt extensible hood. This lens has no floating element.

Only if he is talking about the Apo-Summicron asph. his lens has floating elements.
P.S: as he mentions the price of 1000$ he paid, it would be an extremely good bargain if it was the Apo asph - even with backfocus.

 

Edited by UliWer
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...