Jainbaby Posted October 1, 2019 Share #41 Posted October 1, 2019 Advertisement (gone after registration) There is a gap Leica could totally fill with either: A q minus the lens (full frame with EVF and ILC) An M with EVF (sacrilege?) I have a Q-P, love it, and will not upgrade. I would like to have a ILC and my choices (if I don't want rangefinder) from Leica are CL and SL...if there was something in the middle, how many of us would jump at it....forget about megapixels...just give us the size and features. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 Hi Jainbaby, Take a look here Switching from CL to SL2, anyone?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
eev776 Posted March 12, 2020 Share #42 Posted March 12, 2020 On 9/15/2019 at 1:30 PM, DirkS said: For me the CL was never a compromise. Instead of that the CL is the perfect combination of weight, size and top quality, if you choose the right lenses. I`m not a fan of the 18-56, but with Leica 11-23 (what a great lens!!), Pana 24-105, 1,4/35 and a good Tele (Leica or Pana 70-200 + 2x converter) I don`t see a real reason for buying a SL. The SL2 could be a option. But let`s wait for first reports and tests. If the pic quality is really better you`ll have to decide between light top quality and heavier even better quality. TL 11-23 is favorite lens on my CL, but I did sold my 55-135mm TL. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.