jaapv Posted January 13, 2020 Share #41 Â Posted January 13, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) I'm surprised that a 50 mm lens would show this effect, but basically yes, the presence of an AA filter and a thick filter stack, combined with less compatible microlenses will affect the corner/edge performance of some M lenses, mainly wideangle ones. Leica SL/CL cameras are designed to be compatible for M lenses. You cannot expect that from other-brand cameras. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 13, 2020 Posted January 13, 2020 Hi jaapv, Take a look here Leica M adapter L 18771 with Panasonic S1 anyone?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jankap Posted January 14, 2020 Share #42  Posted January 14, 2020 (edited) See https://kolarivision.com/the-panasonic-s1r-disassembly-and-teardown/ Please go to the end of the article, saying: These layers of sensor cover glass have a combined thickness of roughly 1.45 millimeters. This is thinner than the EOS R, but a decent sight thicker than the Z7’s 1.1mm, the thinnest we’ve come across yet. This makes the S1R a poor candidate for legacy Leica lens performance despite the partnership with Leica, meaning this camera is another excellent candidate for our Ultra-Thin filter modification service. Edited January 14, 2020 by jankap Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill33 Posted January 14, 2020 Share #43 Â Posted January 14, 2020 Is this cover glass thickness layer the same for S1 ? Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boojay Posted January 15, 2020 Share #44  Posted January 15, 2020 (edited) On 1/14/2020 at 12:35 PM, bill33 said: Is this cover glass thickness layer the same for S1 ?  I believe so Bill though I have to say I have seen no such "corner smearing" with any of my M 50's.  Having said that I didn't buy the S1 for using my M lenses, mine is more likely to have a Canon telephoto with the MC-21 adaptor.  Biggest disappointment for me was that the MC-21 and CL weren't compatible, and probably the biggest selling point for me and a possible SL2 somewhere in the future is that the SL2 is.  Although I wait in hope of Sigma telephoto zooms in L mount.  A CL2 with IBIS and compatible with the MC-21, I would join the waiting list and pay a hefty deposit for now happily! I do find the M to L adaptor useful for my longer M primes 75/90/135, for which I have no L or (EF) equivalents, and enjoy the ability to use IBIS and focus magnification.       Edited January 15, 2020 by Boojay Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Richardson Posted January 16, 2020 Share #45  Posted January 16, 2020 I see the problem on my S1 with the 50mm 1.4 ASPH. I do not have the summicron to try. It is highly lens dependent...my 35mm 1.4 FLE is better than the 50mm. I consider it usable. I did not consider the 50mm very usable...at least not before stopped down a lot. So in that case, I bought the 50mm SL summicron, my only native L lens, as I use that focal length a lot. If you intend to focus primarily on the L mount system, the SL summicrons are worth the investment...the size and weight do not bother me, as I am used to bigger cameras, but their performance is incredible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now