Jump to content

Leica M 10


rijve044

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

550 gram would be a digital M on a radical diet and would at least mean a top deck in aluminum à la M262 and/or body parts in other materials than those we are used to.  Even the smaller (depth wise) M-A without battery, sensor and electronics does not get into the 550 range.  

 

M240 => 680 g - depth 42 mm - die cast magnesium with top deck in brass

M262 => 600 g - depth 42 mm - die cast magnesium with top deck in aluminum

M-A => 578 g - depth 38 mm - die cast magnesium with top deck in brass

 

 

The latest pictures that surfaced yesterday do actually look somewhat aluminium in colour and tone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

x
  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'd say a hybrid viewfinder is unlikely given that it appears to have a connection for an EVF.

 

We'll see.

Depends on what meaning you assign to "hybrid". I guess an OVF incorporating an OLED panel for dynamically generated frame lines would qualify as "hybrid".

 

Could be used to superimpose only one line set for a given FL with 6-bit lenses and could as well do parallax correction.

 

As you say, we'll see...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The weight given is 550 gram...

 

That would be an extraordinary weight reduction.

The M3, which I consider an ideally sized light body, weighs 580 grams.

It would make the M240 almost a quarter more heavy than the M10.

If it wasn't for the fact that the leaker has the bodies, and has the feel of being part of the Leica marketing campaign, I wouldn't have believed it.

Perhaps he misread or mistyped, and meant 580 gr.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In case of M9 to M240, I agree that difference was significant if you cared for the extras. The high ISO is almost 2 stop better and LV/movie is totally new allowing legacy lens usage. Increase battery life is another bonus. My overlap of M9 and M240 was only a month.

 

edit: With M240, I can say that it may work for me as a camera for life (depending on the robustness, so far so good in last 2.5 years). With M9 I could not say that because I would have to have other cameras to supplement other usage (macro, tele, etc). M240 can be one camera doing it all for ever. Live long M240 ! :)

Although I quite agree I must confess that I quite enjoy my M9 which I do use next to my Monochrom1 for convenience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on what meaning you assign to "hybrid". I guess an OVF incorporating an OLED panel for dynamically generated frame lines would qualify as "hybrid".

 

Could be used to superimpose only one line set for a given FL with 6-bit lenses and could as well do parallax correction.

 

As you say, we'll see...

 

I think the frame line preview lever rules out the use of individual frame lines. A six position switch would be a bugger to control.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having to take it off in order to be able to put the camera in your bag (or struggling to get the camera out of your bag if you didn't remove the EVF. I had the EVF on the T camera and it was a pain! In use the EVF was fine.

 

It looks like you own the wrong camera bag for the T. I usually first buy a camera and then look which bag fits the camer and lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like you own the wrong camera bag for the T. I usually first buy a camera and then look which bag fits the camer and lenses.

 

But can you find one? The problem is that by adding the EVF as a permanent fixture to the top of an M, maybe have a grip as well, and at least from base to finder, its now close to a good size FF DSLR.  But nothing else you're going to carry with it is at that scale.  DSLR bags are designed for DSLR sized lenses.  Mirrorless bags are designed to fit mirrorless sized bodies. So either the camera fit is tight or the glass tends to flop around.  If you're looking a simple over the shoulder solution, there aren't a lot of choices. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on what meaning you assign to "hybrid". I guess an OVF incorporating an OLED panel for dynamically generated frame lines would qualify as "hybrid".

Could be used to superimpose only one line set for a given FL with 6-bit lenses and could as well do parallax correction. [...]

 

I would have expected a move like this together with an electronic rangefinder but i like this idea as well. Too soon to be true i suspect but i may be wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...