Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

2 hours ago, Steven said:

This is not at all what I personally call a vintage look. I'm not saying I dont like it. Just that it's not what I expected. 

I definitely would recommend this lens, and I will keep it myself. I just would not at all describe to someone who's looking to buy as it was described to me..... 

Steven, take your time to 'learn' this lens.

You have not to like/love this special lens.

This lens needs to be used a while, so not love at first glance.

I'm glad that Leica offered this lens in more modern 'character' comparing to the original, for me this new released Summaron-M can 'replace' the older one with

'something else' added 😉, nothing was 'loss' (maybe the filter zize A36 ? ).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

x
15 hours ago, Steven said:

Just got mine last week.... not extremely amazed so far... 

I've used mine on the M10-P but am now almost exclusively using it on my M10M. I never was in the crowd that talked up the vintage look. My appreciation for this lens has to do with it's sharpness, contrast, b&w tonal rendering and extremely compact size. I love it.

Admittedly, you and I are probably on a different page with the "vintage look." I bought one of the new 50mm 1.2 Noctilux lenses as soon as they were available and quickly surmised that the "vintage look" just meant soft. That damn lens was unsharp everywhere wide open and I hated it so much I sold it after just three weeks. No regrets on it being gone. Next time I want a vintage look, I'll just buy an actual old lens. 

Edited by fotografr
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Steven said:

You summarised it perfectly. It's a great lens, but below my expectations. These expectations were boosted by you guys. 

What is really think about this lens is the following: 

- I am impressed at the image quality it delivers in such a small package. Very sharp, reliable image... 

- I am disappointed in the way it renders. Everyone told me it had a vintage look. I don't see it at all, vignetting aside. I find the image to be tack sharp like a modern lens. It actually looks a lot like my Summilux 28 at 5.6. This is not at all what I personally call a vintage look. I'm not saying I dont like it. Just that it's not what I expected. 

I definitely would recommend this lens, and I will keep it myself. I just would not at all describe to someone who's looking to buy as it was described to me..... 

Unless you’ve mixed up the terms Character vs Vintage, I don’t see why you would hve expected a vintage look. I have never used the term “vintage”, and this lens oozes character. 
 

If I remember correctly, this lens was always refered as having:

-character

-sharpness

-excellent contrast

-a lot of light falloff.

-tiny

And this is exactly what you’ve got, in a 28mm package.

 

edit:

The Summaron, which I also like calling the King of Mood because that’s what it is to me, could also be called “The Orthosis”.

Why the Orthosis? Because in itself, that lens serves to correct the bad habit that many photographers have to simply rely on bokeh to make a shot “great”, according to them.

This very bad habit of relying on bokeh counteracts the action of composing and actually causes damages to one’s photography. By using this Orthosis, you will be forced to actually gain an appealing image by means of composing an appealing photograph with proper depth of field. Yes, composing versus bokeh.The only added magic will come from the light falloff and sexy handling. 

The other perverted gain is that you will actually have your camera with you because it’s portable, as opposed to hauling a Summilux around, every day.
It boils down to actually using your camera vs not using it.

Edited by Capuccino-Muffin
  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Steven said:

You summarised it perfectly. It's a great lens, but below my expectations. These expectations were boosted by you guys. 

What is really think about this lens is the following: 

- I am impressed at the image quality it delivers in such a small package. Very sharp, reliable image... 

- I am disappointed in the way it renders. Everyone told me it had a vintage look. I don't see it at all, vignetting aside. I find the image to be tack sharp like a modern lens. It actually looks a lot like my Summilux 28 at 5.6. This is not at all what I personally call a vintage look. I'm not saying I dont like it. Just that it's not what I expected. 

I definitely would recommend this lens, and I will keep it myself. I just would not at all describe to someone who's looking to buy as it was described to me..... 

I do feel that the vignetting and medium contrast does give the lens a different look to a sharp modern lens but because of its slow maximum aperture its not soft or glowing wide open.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/24/2021 at 2:07 AM, Steven said:

You summarised it perfectly. It's a great lens, but below my expectations. These expectations were boosted by you guys. 

What is really think about this lens is the following: 

- I am impressed at the image quality it delivers in such a small package. Very sharp, reliable image... 

- I am disappointed in the way it renders. Everyone told me it had a vintage look. I don't see it at all, vignetting aside. I find the image to be tack sharp like a modern lens. It actually looks a lot like my Summilux 28 at 5.6. This is not at all what I personally call a vintage look. I'm not saying I dont like it. Just that it's not what I expected. 

I definitely would recommend this lens, and I will keep it myself. I just would not at all describe to someone who's looking to buy as it was described to me..... 

An 89 page image thread and you bought it based on what was written about it? 😬

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fast lenses from the say 1950-65 tended to be right at the limit of what was  possible technically at the time and performance wide open were mostly poor or glowing by the standard of modern lenses.

Steven interprets that as a "vintage look" but that is only a part of the story,the vignette and the less than perfect sharpness near the edge of an image is also a valid sign of an older design.

It would be interesting to see a comprehensive comparison type review between the old and the modern version of the summaron just out of curiosity because i love the summaron anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

M10 + SummaronM 28mm

Claus

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

M10 + Summaron M 28mm

Claus

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, fotografr said:

Clicking the image shows the lens capability best.

Yep - that is the lens.

 

Lack of vignette suggests f8 or 11. With this lens in this thread perhaps we should start recording aperture setting.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

28 Summaron at some closed aperture (f11?) on pushed tri-X. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

28 Summaron, Tri-X, flash

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 13
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, roelandinho said:

28 Summaron, Tri-X, flash

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Lovely moment wonderfully captured!

Deserves to be posted also in 'Portraits' for wider viewing.

Edited by pedaes
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mp + 28 summaron 

kentmere 400 | ilfotec HC

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

28 Summaron, Tri-X, flash

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 23 Stunden schrieb Dao De Leitz:

 

 

 ... .   Shades of Chlorophylls

 

 

 

 

 

Summaron-M 28mm - slightly cropped

 

 

 

 

on Flickr, original - by Dao De Leitz

Thorsten

 

Wonderful, very atmospheric picture! Love the greens in it. I think, I would print it BIG and enjoy looking at it perhaps while listening to Debussy Images by the fabulous ABM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@e1k3  ... Thanks for the comment, it appears fairytale-like, fantastic to me as well, I think.

However, the direct surround of the image is also left natural. 

 

 

 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Summaron-M 28mm

 

 

 

 

 

on Flickr, original - by Dao De Leitz

Thorsten

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...