Jump to content

NEW M.. This year.. This Fall...


EdwardM

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It was they had the DMR and they dropped it, not because it wasn't good but just because it wasn't feasible. With the S they have something unique that sets them apart (like with the M)

 

The will NOT release a new DSLR. except the S line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, after weeks of debate, what are you all predicting? If announcement is only a fortnight away what has anyone to prove? Speculation is OK when it is based on fact. Speculation without fact is a pipe dream.

No fact, all fiction, is acceptable in literature but not much use to anyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have said it before and I say it again: There will be no new DSLR system, neither from Leica nor from any other vendor. Any new system will be mirrorless.

 

That sounds very reassuring, and perhaps it is an accurate reflection of the state of dSLR demand; but does it really withstand closer inspection?

 

You are not saying there will be no new dSLR cameras, just new systems.  A new system would mean that the main dSLR players (Canon & Nikon) would develop either a new mount (why would they do that?) or a new format (Leica is pretty much the only player to introduce a new dSLR in medium format with the S camera, and that is pretty much niche).  From what we read, I would think that both prospects are very unlikely - a new digital medium format would be pretty amazing, but to be honest, if I was looking in that direction, I'd be looking at the new PhaseOne system or the S(007).

 

So it is not really that profound, is it?  What you're really saying is that there is no growth in dSLR to warrant a new player, or for Leica to go back into 35mm SLR as it already has S series medium format dSLR, the rangefinder and shortly a mirrorless system camera (that is certainly what I understand from the titbits I have heard).  I do agree with the speculation that the new system camera is not going to be aimed at the Sony end of the market; Leica's point of difference is providing state of the art well, without unnecessary frills (that level of refinement doesn't come cheap).  That is what makes this all the more interesting.  Leica's interpretation of the APS-C camera (the T) was, in my view, brilliant.  Its interpretation of the full frame mirrorless system is going to be similarly very interesting - particularly if they follow the lead by bringing the design in-house as they did with the Q.

 

I'm not sure that a lot of what has been suggested is realistic (e.g., no M adapter - that would be an odd move, considering that the M lenses are at the top for full frame 35mm photography; even the Red video cameras have an M lens adapter).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have little doubt this factored into Leica's decision to not develop an R10, or whatever they'd have called it.  The amortization of R&D would have extended beyond the life expectancy of the 35mm SLR concept.

Agreed. In my opinion ... Good thinking on the part of Leica.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got back from a week long holiday in a packed European tourist city.  Practically everyone had a <2 year old Canon DSLR around their neck.  A few Fuji's, a few A7 variants and one suave looking older German gent with an M9.  But thousands upon thousands of Canons (and some Nikons too).

 

Anyway, having shot practically the whole week with an M9 ... I don't think I need anything else.  Live view would have been useful on a few occasions.  Better ISO and higher dynamic range from time to time.  Very occasionally fast AF would have helped.  But, you know, once you've got AF on a lens, it's very hard to have the discipline to shoot manual.

 

The M is something special: pure and reduced.  I hope they keep it that way. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got back from a week long holiday in a packed European tourist city. Practically everyone had a <2 year old Canon DSLR around their neck. A few Fuji's, a few A7 variants and one suave looking older German gent with an M9. But thousands upon thousands of Canons (and some Nikons too).

 

Anyway, having shot practically the whole week with an M9 ... I don't think I need anything else. Live view would have been useful on a few occasions. Better ISO and higher dynamic range from time to time. Very occasionally fast AF would have helped. But, you know, once you've got AF on a lens, it's very hard to have the discipline to shoot manual.

 

The M is something special: pure and reduced. I hope they keep it that way.

It's funny but I had exactly the same experience. Just came back from one week in the Czech Republic and I was shocked at the number of Canon and Nikon DSLRs in the hands of tourists. Very few mirrorless and mostly with Asian tourists, but the vast majority was DSLRS which makes me wonder about the imminent death of this technology at the hands of mirrorless. One guy even brought a 1Dx with a 50/1.4 to a classical concert but didn't try to take any photos. I only saw an M3 with one Chinese tourist but never anyone with a digital M, apart from me.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...