Jump to content

The next speculation


jaapv

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 464
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The Leica M is a great camera in many ways.

 

I like the rangefinder, so the M is the best for that  :D  :wub:

 

But the sensor is very good, the battery provides many shots, the shutter is mostly silent, the controls are clean and simple... etc. 

 

I even would be happy with less features... 

 

The key elements for me are viewfinder/rangefinder, sensor, shutter and battery... and all this is very good, state of the art (and a clear improvement compared to the M8/M9 generation).

 

I tried the Sony 7 -first model- and I liked it but I don't care about AF and the shutter actuation was noisy.

 

Sony had a beta version of an application -to be installed in the camera- for easy correction of vignetting and magenta shade of manual focus lenses. But I don't know if this app is ready and if it works. Anyway, wide angle Leica lenses are best on a Leica M camera. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to my dealer, Leica will release a full frame fixed lens camera on June 11th.

 

There seems to be consensus in that view.  The Sony Rx-1 was, by all accounts, a great camera.  I'm not sure that releasing a competitor to that camera 32 months after it was brought to market will gain Leica a lot of new customers.  I guess the technology of the Leica will also be almost three years old - let's see, average clip on EVF (same as for the M(240)); CMOSIS sensor; Summicron 35/2, but made of plastic in Japan; maybe a rangefinder (that will have everyone confused).

 

The good news is that it won't threaten either my bank balance or my continued enjoyment of my Leica T.

 

I'm ready to be underwhelmed.

 

Cheers

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

If so, an odd move which I do not understand... an "upgrade" for X series owners ?

 

Strange "upgrade" if Leica really does think that there is a future in APS-C format.  It leaves both the X cameras somewhat stranded ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Not sure. It may be that Leica subscribes to the view, widely held, that APS is the equivalent of the 135 class of yesteryear, and full frame the equivalent of 645 cameras, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure. It may be that Leica subscribes to the view, widely held, that APS is the equivalent of the 135 class of yesteryear, and full frame the equivalent of 645 cameras, etc.

 

You're very loyal, Jaap ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The RX1 has been widely successful for Sony, there does appear to be demand for a tiny full frame fixed 35mm lens camera.

However, whats really taken off is the Sony A7. People want an interchangeable lens full frame camera that's tiny.
A full frame Leica T at a lower price point than the M is what Leica needs to increase market share.
 
 
 

 

Not sure. It may be that Leica subscribes to the view, widely held, that APS is the equivalent of the 135 class of yesteryear, and full frame the equivalent of 645 cameras, etc.

 

That's quite true, due to the generally greater resolution and lower noise of digital.

This also means that digital has elevated the M to a true professional format in a compact camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To those who are already complaining about the price, it is instructive that the Sony RX1 is about $2800.  I don't think it has an EVF.   Surely, Leica will not compete on price (I don't think they ever have) so one must expect a Leica FF compact to come in at a price higher than that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm curious what focal length this FF fixed lens camera will be.  I'm guessing 28 or 35.  

 

We're all guess about that and a lot more.

 

La Vide Leica say it will be 28mm - that's a very interesting choice, if it's true.  Speculating wildly, if it's a 28 Summicron, between f/2 and f/1.4, and the lens is optimised for the 24MP CMOSIS sensor, then it will potentially be a very special camera indeed.  If it's packaged in the Leica T body, but with a built in hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder (still haven't really got my head around how that works) then I imagine it will be very attractive to people who (a) like that focal length, and (B) want a camera that takes excellent pictures.

 

For spec sheet readers, it will probably be a meh product, playing catchup with the Sony Rx-1R or A7, which will have more MP, more features and will be cheaper.

 

A fixed lens package (28mm) will be interesting if the user interface is cool and intuitive, it has to be said - the view finder is going to be a challenge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

28mm FF would be perfect if it's a 'shift lens' … an architect's tool camera.

 

dunk

Well... interesting and no trivial hipotesis... probably a shift 28 with f2 aperture is quite a difficult design but it would be an unicum even if it would be 2,8/3,5... not of my interest, but could have a sense and a special market of its own...

Of course, shift capability does demand an EVF (or a LCD with facilities for a good view ?)thus making it a complex and costly design...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would the 'fixed lens' have a leaf shutter? - Thus maybe reducing risk of soiling the sensor with dust from a focal plane shutter? Or maybe it could have an electronic shutter? A new CMOS sensor might include a sophisticated electronic shutter?

 

dunk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...