Jump to content

waiting for the R to M adapter


hejenk

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 464
  • Created
  • Last Reply

For an extremely well designed and manufactured product, I find the adapter to be very reasonably priced.

The performance with R lenses is first rate, I am extremely happy with mine.

I doubt that any R lens owner would be disappointed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Just received mine today (Northern California).

 

The fit and finish exceed my expectations. Although the Novoflex LEM/LER did the job, the Leica version is a clearly superior piece of metalwork, in my opinion.

 

As beautiful as the CNC work and the elegantly-engineeered tripod socket are, the 18-month delay to market remains an impenetrable mystery. But we live from this day forward...

Link to post
Share on other sites

It beggars belief that, 17 months on from announcement, this is still not freely available.I want to buy a second one (no chance) to have one with and without the tripod mount because fitting it is not the work of a moment and only some of the lenses I have will benefit from it.

 

Pleased to say that, thanks to a heads-up from another forum member, I've now bought a second, so meeting my need for one with tripod mount for macro and tele work and one for normal use.

 

I have to say the R lenses are rather fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

80 Summilux, 100 Macro Apo, 180 Apo's, as well as the really exotic long Apo telephotos……what's not to like :rolleyes:

 

The weight is what kills me from using my long teles. Very much like the 15/2.8, APO 180/2.8, but the APO280/4 and 105-280 are monsters (as are any long teles of quality). I still like my APO 70-180, but again there weight is my limiting factor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bill

 

I very much like the 28-90. The 35-70/4 has a macro button, but I like the 28-90 more, even without macro. To me the best long zoom is the 70-180 because it is an APO.

I have been looking at both. The Macro version seems to go for $1400 average. The 28-90 is $6000 to $8000. Not sure if I can go there. Maybe the 28 to 70.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The weight is what kills me from using my long teles. Very much like the 15/2.8, APO 180/2.8, but the APO280/4 and 105-280 are monsters (as are any long teles of quality). I still like my APO 70-180, but again there weight is my limiting factor.

 

Lou,

 

When I get back from India, I may sell my 80-200/f4, which is OK quality but I want a longer lens. I have a Tele Tessar 300/f4 but that is an old design and wide open is less than wonderful. I am going to get the last Contax MF lens designed (along with the 28-85), the 100-300 Vario Sonnar. Tests put this lens right up with the Leica APO zooms but it is much lighter (about the same as the 80-200), compact and has the feature I have come to appreciate on my 28-85, one touch zoom/focus. I already have a Novoflex LEM/CONT and the tripod support ring should be out soon. Having been humping my 240 with Noctilux mounted on it a lot over the last two weeks in temperatures up to 35º and 85% humidity, I agree, weight is a killer. The good news is that the dreaded over temperature lock up has not struck to date but I have not been using the EVF except in the evenings, when it makes focusing the Nocti a whole lot easier with its light amplification.

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does look like they are starting to appear in greater volumes. Leica has finally woken up to the real level of interest in using their back catalogue of lenses and we could even have a situation where there are more R lenses being actively used on M240s than are still being used on Rx film cameras.

 

As for the cost of zooms, my 28-90 cost about $5000 (to compare with the numbers Bill quoted above) though rather more than when it was new. Still, limited supply drives prices up and you either play or step back. That said, any comparable new M lens - if it could be built to avoid blocking the optical viewfinder - would be more expensive still, just look at the cost of the WATE with its puny 1:1.2 zoom ratio.

 

I'm only interested in R lenses which push the usage envelope - zoom, macros, X2 converter, telephoto, arguably T/S and am less interested in focal lengths covered by the M lenses though I do have an 80 Summilux.

 

The ability to use lenses from different manufacturers is a real source of interest to me, though I restrict myself to R, F and M42 lenses. I think there are some here with drawers full of glass which are seeing the light of day for the first time in years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...