Jump to content

Attention all Noctilux 0.95 owners.


Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Shoot at 1 meter and crop. .......waalaa

 

I actually find the 1m limit very helpful. Portraits at 1m are very relaxed and natural looking. My Canons which focus far closer I find always put me at odds in the sense I get carried away and come in too close for portraits with a 50mm which is not really suited to natural flattering perspective for faces. intact 3m is considered the "safe" distance for natural perspective for a face. Anything closer starts to distort.

 

Also depth of field at 1m shot at 0.95 means one eye is sharp and the other isn't. This generally looks amateurish, IMO. Unless it's done on purpose with something in mind.

 

I have the 75mm Summilux which takes care of super close portraits which has a focal length far more suited to it. It does a great job of it,

 

Also as Neil has said cropping is the best way forward. The quality is so good you can do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Having owned and loved the f1 Noctilux for years, I decided late last year to also pick up the f0.95 version. My thinking and hope was to retain much of the magic of the f1 Noct when shot wide open, while also providing a more flexible all-around lens. One I could stop down at will without worrying about focus shift.

 

It meets that brief exceptionally well, IMHO. Since picking it up in early December, it's probably been on my camera 65% of the time. It would be even higher if the new Summicron 50 APO hadn't arrived in March.

 

Here are several quick samples, all shot with the Monochrom. The first was shot just a couple hours after picking up the lens, and represents typical walk-around-in-the-dark usage. Shot wide open.

 

The second is an example of using it in normal daylight, shot at f2.

 

The third is also shot wide open, albeit more for artistic effect than because it was necessary to maintain shutter speed.

 

The Noctilux - both versions, with a slight nod to the f0.95 version - remains my favorite lens.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS
Having owned and loved the f1 Noctilux for years, I decided late last year to also pick up the f0.95 version. My thinking and hope was to retain much of the magic of the f1 Noct when shot wide open, while also providing a more flexible all-around lens. One I could stop down at will without worrying about focus shift.

 

It meets that brief exceptionally well, IMHO. Since picking it up in early December, it's probably been on my camera 65% of the time. It would be even higher if the new Summicron 50 APO hadn't arrived in March.

 

Here are several quick samples, all shot with the Monochrom. The first was shot just a couple hours after picking up the lens, and represents typical walk-around-in-the-dark usage. Shot wide open.

 

The second is an example of using it in normal daylight, shot at f2.

 

The third is also shot wide open, albeit more for artistic effect than because it was necessary to maintain shutter speed.

 

The Noctilux - both versions, with a slight nod to the f0.95 version - remains my favorite lens.

 

[ATTACH]386250[/ATTACH]

 

 

[ATTACH]386251[/ATTACH]

 

 

[ATTACH]386252[/ATTACH]

thanks for sharing Jeff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS
Having owned and loved the f1 Noctilux for years, I decided late last year to also pick up the f0.95 version. My thinking and hope was to retain much of the magic of the f1 Noct when shot wide open, while also providing a more flexible all-around lens. One I could stop down at will without worrying about focus shift.

 

It meets that brief exceptionally well, IMHO. Since picking it up in early December, it's probably been on my camera 65% of the time. It would be even higher if the new Summicron 50 APO hadn't arrived in March.

 

Here are several quick samples, all shot with the Monochrom. The first was shot just a couple hours after picking up the lens, and represents typical walk-around-in-the-dark usage. Shot wide open.

 

The second is an example of using it in normal daylight, shot at f2.

 

The third is also shot wide open, albeit more for artistic effect than because it was necessary to maintain shutter speed.

 

The Noctilux - both versions, with a slight nod to the f0.95 version - remains my favorite lens.

 

[ATTACH]386250[/ATTACH]

 

 

[ATTACH]386251[/ATTACH]

 

 

[ATTACH]386252[/ATTACH]

thanks for sharing Jeff
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Just come off the Robert White webpage and I see that they make an adapter ring (60mm) for the RF75 Lee filter holder.............has anyone ever tried putting a GND filter on there Noctilux??

I had one made at my work for the 21mm Lux but the vingetting was horrendous so threw away that £250 project.

My guy feeling is that the Noctilux is not for landscape.........agree???

Link to post
Share on other sites

My guy feeling is that the Noctilux is not for landscape.........agree???

 

Because you want to use a graduated neutral density filter?

 

Any lens is good for landscape - it just depends what you're wanting to take a picture of. I have a huge print of a landscape on my wall (well, 1.05 metres across) taken with a 75 Summilux. I don't see why I wouldn't use a Noctilux, stopped down.

 

Cheers

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

Thanks for the feedback. I get the MM and lens when i return from my trip in Nigeria, so not much landscape with that combination. Will get the 21se for landscape with the new M if I ever get one

Link to post
Share on other sites

My guy feeling is that the Noctilux is not for landscape.........agree???

 

No I don't agree.

 

Shot with 1.0/50 Noctilux E60 v3 on the M9

These are glorious as A2 prints.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe it's my monitor but these look sooooooo dark and the horizon is off on the first :)

 

It's your monitor. There is a huge tonal range here.

 

And no the horizon is not off in the first - there is sea between the horizon and the surf at the left of the photo, and the seas were large explaining the irregular horizon line.

Oh that's right, I forgot the Noctilux is no good for horizons :D

 

My point though was, as per John's comment, that even the old version of this lens can do a perfectly good landscape.

 

Regards,

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bloody great images Mark!

 

I can visualize them as very large prints.

 

Back on topic: Any lens can be used for landscape, just as any lens can be used for portraiture. The only limitation is the photographer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS
It's your monitor. There is a huge tonal range here.

 

And no the horizon is not off in the first - there is sea between the horizon and the surf at the left of the photo, and the seas were large explaining the irregular horizon line.

Oh that's right, I forgot the Noctilux is no good for horizons :D

 

My point though was, as per John's comment, that even the old version of this lens can do a perfectly good landscape.

 

Regards,

Mark

 

Mark

You are correct. ....it's the 15 Heineken I had for lunch threw me off:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...