Jump to content

Preparing for the M


chris_tribble

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I paid more for mine than I would have liked but it is mint and I was slow off the mark. Still, it was less than a 35mm Summilux. Even if Leica was to introduce a replacement, it is hardly going to be cheap.

 

That's the way it seems to be. ... Leica Leica R 28 90MMF2 8 4 5 ASPH E67 ROM Germany 9 10 | eBay

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 847
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You are as wrong as I was when I said that :(

 

Yup, let's not forget the dessert you owe me.:) I'll remind you if I ever make a return visit there.

 

In fairness, though, you did say earlier in that same thread that the only reason that you might get the M would be to use R lenses (but you were disappointed in the forecasted EVF).

 

We all change minds. Maybe a good idea, though, not to make emphatic purchase denials going forward. ;)

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the comments on the Leica 28-90 Vario R 2.8-4.5. If I am going to get one, I'd better move fast, because in the time of a few post, "offering" prices went from £5000 to USD18,000 :eek: !!! The ebay link for US $4,599.95 is beginning to look like quite a bargain :p . Alas, the 28-90 may be a bit on the pricey side for my pocketbook.

 

Regarding wlaidlaw's suggestion of considering Zeiss Contax CX/Y 28-85 zoom instead, I am unfamiliar with that lens, but will look into it.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wilson, with a zoom lens wouldn't you more likely use it with the EVF, making the framelines a nonissue?

 

Alan,

 

The 28/90 framelines are to activate the R lens selection menu. I would of course, use the EVF.

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

The Panasonic Micro 4/3 to M adapter seems well made to me and works very well. Part Number DMW-MA2M.

 

If we were closer I'd let you borrow one of mine to try out since I have two which seldom get use anymore.

 

Algrove,

 

I have bought a Metabones one. It looks absolutely identical to the Voigtlander one but is half the price. See thread here http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m-lenses/273151-very-nice-leica-m4-3-mid.html

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a heavy lens John but a beauty.

I'am also looking forward to trying it on the M240 as well as the 21-35 and the 80-200mm lenses.

These Lenses are superb on my Canon DSLR.

 

Erwin Puts states, that the 28-90 at 5.6 has an impeccable performance that easily surpasses the quality of the Summicron 50 mm lens.

 

Good Luck

 

Ken.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone preparing for the M might be interested in the pristine Nikon 28 PC f3.5 lens + 300mm ED f4.5 that I've just put on to the Buy and Sell. These are advertised with a specially adapted Nikon to M adapter with the correct coding for the M-240 and so that it brings up the correct framelines (Malcolm Taylor did this work for me).

 

I'm selling as I've been able to source some alternatives that more closely suit my needs - but both lenses have been tested on the M-240 and produce excellent results.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LCT, your clock makes a welcome return... ;)

Still didn't find the time to refill the gas :rolleyes: Better ad for Canon than for Leica BTW. No disturbing noise or smearing effect at 800 iso on that 7 years old camera. Proof that CMOS sensors can be very good when makers don't listen to marketers too much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LCT, your clock makes a welcome return... ;)

 

It's an Atmos isn't it? Nice :)

 

Back on topic: not that prices for R lenses have gone through the roof, some of the pre-G Nikkor lenses are decent. Some of the early ones are one-touch, which personally I don't get on with, but they switched to two-ring at some point.

 

Optical quality varies a bit, but the best ones are solid, and have decent optics.

 

I've got an 80-200/2.8 two-ring in a cupboard, which is excellent, and I might pickup a 28-50 or so too.

 

- Steve

 

Edit to add: Just seen that the 28-50/3.5 was a one touch, oh well :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Playing with the M240 this morning, I have found disappointingly, that the coding pits in the Leitax R to M adapter are wrongly machined. They are about half a pit too far clockwise and will therefore not pick up on the LED's to activate the R menu. The coding pits on my Amedeo Muscelli Visoflex replacement adapter are correctly positioned and pick up immediately. Given the high price of the Leitax adapter, I will want this corrected FOC. I will contact David Llado today to advise him of the problem.

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

With this new system released, many folks in my local community are selling their M lens. Ranges from old to modern lens, that includes 50 lux asph, 35 lux asph fle, 35 cron asph, 21 f3.4. Sad.. On the other hand, I suppose they don't require fast lens because of the new iso ranges.

 

I look forward to pick up a 35 lux asph fle for my m9p. ;) I wonder who will off load their Monochrom in months to come.

Link to post
Share on other sites

many folks in my local community are selling their M lens. Ranges from old to modern lens, that includes 50 lux asph, 35 lux asph fle, 35 cron asph, 21 f3.4.

 

Where do you live, I mean what area you are talking about?

And where do you look for listings?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could some kind soul tell me if the EVF2 has grid line capability? Also, is this feature available on the LCD?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

So far as I know, no. Though I have asked for this - maybe a later firmware change?

Link to post
Share on other sites

With this new system released, many folks in my local community are selling their M lens. Ranges from old to modern lens, that includes 50 lux asph, 35 lux asph fle, 35 cron asph, 21 f3.4. Sad.. On the other hand, I suppose they don't require fast lens because of the new iso ranges.

 

I look forward to pick up a 35 lux asph fle for my m9p. ;) I wonder who will off load their Monochrom in months to come.

 

Heh, people who sell M lenses to buy a new body in my experience almost always regret it.. in the meantime, don't let that nice glass go to waste ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...