Jump to content

Coloured Filters And B+W Film


Stealth3kpl

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I thought I'd compare results with yellow, orange, and green filters. Well,....I can't tell any difference. Where did I go wrong (or can you tell a difference?)?

Pete

 

Yellow:

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

Orange:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Green:

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess, your scanner is "correcting" the image, trying to make them uniform with a program installed at the factory. I use yellow and red for almost all of my shots outside. I certain can tell the difference, although I do not scan my negatives for printing, I still use chemicals.

 

Do the negatives look different to your eye? There should be differences in the contrast between them, it should be apparent. This is especially true for the orange and green filters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either have prints made from the negatives or just try a contact sheet. TOTC may have hit the mark with your scanner adjusting the image. On paper the filter effects should be obvious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The irony is that just the green filter caused the darkest shades of green.

 

What is the reason? All three examples are aligned in terms of exposure to the best representation of the white clouds and the blue sky.

As a green filter has the weakest blue damping, one has to make a darker enlargement than necessary when using an orange filter. This of course affects the overall impression of the image, and the foliage is even darker than when using an orange filter.

 

I recommend the use of a deep yellow filter (Wratten #15, available from Heliopan). It provides almost as good tonality of sky and clouds as an orange filter with the advantage that it does not affect the greens, if that is to be feared.

 

Regards,

Ludwig

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Do the negatives look different to your eye? There should be differences in the contrast between them, it should be apparent. This is especially true for the orange and green filters.

 

No. They all appear the same

 

What film did you shoot?

Fgcm

 

It's Fuji Acros (Legacy Pro 100)

 

I really don't know what to think :confused:

Pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the original scene in monochrome or full color? ;)

 

Seriously, how green was the foliage and how blue was the sky? Orange, yellow, and green filters would all keep the foliage from going real dark. And if the sky is not very blue, that might explain the lack of a major difference. If you do this again, insert a grey card and also shoot one without any filter. Then make sure when scanning that the grey card is reproduced the same in each.

 

It does seem peculiar to me that there would be so little difference but as I said, the subject colors may be the reason. It does make me wonder about all of the concern about the MM's spectral response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the original scene in monochrome or full color? ;)

 

:D

 

 

Seriously, how green was the foliage and how blue was the sky? Orange, yellow, and green filters would all keep the foliage from going real dark. And if the sky is not very blue, that might explain the lack of a major difference. If you do this again, insert a grey card and also shoot one without any filter. Then make sure when scanning that the grey card is reproduced the same in each.

 

It does seem peculiar to me that there would be so little difference but as I said, the subject colors may be the reason. It does make me wonder about all of the concern about the MM's spectral response.

 

It was a sunny day with bright blue sky. The lawn is quite bright green, the tree darkish green, and the brighter looking bush at the edge of the lawn is quite a bright yellow/green.

I'm not sure if this is of use, taken with a ND filter:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting problem.

I will test some different films with red and yellow filters and I will post the result.

 

I have been a "beliver" of filters but I must say I never made a test.

 

Fgcm

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not own an orange or green filter, but I though I would duplicate your experiment with no filter, a yellow filter, and a red filter. I shot this on Ilford FP4 at ISO 100 and developed in Rodinal 50 to 1 for 12 minutes. I then scanned them quickly on my Canon 8800F scanner with no care for dust, scratches, etc. However, the examples shows the differences between using even a yellow or red filter vs no filter. It is bright afternoon sun, no clouds, blue sky.

 

First photo, no filter, 1/500 of a second at f11.

 

Second photo, yellow filter, 1/500 of a second at f8 (to compensate for the filter factor)

 

Third photo, red filter, 1/500 of a second with lens set 1/2 way between f4 and f.6 (again, filter factor)

 

No compensation was done in photoshop and the scanner was set to manual, thus you see what the negatives look like. I do not know why your results are different than mine. But, you can see the differences the filters make in the sky.

 

Forgot to mention, camera was my Hasselblad 501C with 80mm lens. Also, note the graduations in the sky due to the not so good Canon scanner. This is why I wet print my stuff for my own use.

 

Wayne

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why don't mine work? :D:confused:

Sorry, no idea. But from studying textbooks about b/w photography as well as from my own experience in both analog and digital b/w photography I am 100 % sure your result is the exception, not the norm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...