stump4545 Posted February 23, 2012 Share #1 Â Posted February 23, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) just wondering if anyone can get sharp results handholding their m9/50mm combo shooting at 1/8sec? Â Â 1/15 seems not a problem but 1/8 seems to be pushing it too far. Â will 1/8sec be achievable with practice or will it more likely be mostly miss? Â Â thank you kindly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 23, 2012 Posted February 23, 2012 Hi stump4545, Take a look here shutter at 1/8 sharp results?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
stuny Posted February 23, 2012 Share #2 Â Posted February 23, 2012 Yes, and much slower if you apply all the same techniques used with firearms target shooting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Geschlecht Posted February 24, 2012 Share #3 Â Posted February 24, 2012 Hello stump4545, Â Routine w/ an M3. Â Listen to Stuart please. Â Best Regards, Â Michael Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stump4545 Posted February 24, 2012 Author Share #4 Â Posted February 24, 2012 what shutter speed should routine be when my subject is still? 1/8? 1/4? Â is 1/2 sec easy to accomplish with a m9/50mm or this just too slow even with lots and lots of practice? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Geschlecht Posted February 24, 2012 Share #5 Â Posted February 24, 2012 Hello Again stump4545, Â The best way to find out is to practice & to try. Â For some people 1/125th of a second is not a fast enough shutter speed. For others 1 sec is easy. Â Also: The more you practice, the easier it gets & the luckier you get. Â Best Regards, Â Michael Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted February 24, 2012 Share #6 Â Posted February 24, 2012 just wondering if anyone can get sharp results handholding their m9/50mm combo shooting at 1/8sec? Â OMHO - if you are athletic or thin, if you have a heartbeat you cannot hold 1/8th as a tripod would. But it might be good enough for you. Look at all the OOF images on this site to see how few really care. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 24, 2012 Share #7 Â Posted February 24, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) Depends on your ability. There is a post on slow shutterspeed technique in the M9 FAQ. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
250swb Posted February 24, 2012 Share #8 Â Posted February 24, 2012 I think most people can claim to be able to hold a camera still at 1/8th. Can they claim to do it all the time though, or do it to order every time, I don't think so. There is bound to be a high failure rate which gets swept under the carpet. So if you want to shoot slow shutter speeds on a regular basis use a tripod and remove the failure rate altogether. The photograph is more important than making a contest out of how you support the damned camera. Â Steve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
moikle Posted February 24, 2012 Share #9 Â Posted February 24, 2012 I used to be quite good at hand holding at low speeds then I got an arrhythmia. Â Mike Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StephenPatterson Posted February 24, 2012 Share #10 Â Posted February 24, 2012 just wondering if anyone can get sharp results handholding their m9/50mm combo shooting at 1/8sec? Â Depends on how much I had to drink the night before... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunsworth Posted February 24, 2012 Share #11 Â Posted February 24, 2012 It depends on how you define sharp. The results will always be less sharp than with a tripod, how 'less sharp' varies from individual to individual. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 24, 2012 Share #12  Posted February 24, 2012 We should not approach this with the idea that there is a sharp divide between photographs with and without camera shake. Basically allphotographs have camera shake. 1. Imperceptible shake. The amount of blur is smaller than the resolution through thelens/sensor/printer at any magnification. Only with a good tripod andor very high shutterspeed. 2. Irrelevant shake. The amount of blur is smaller than the resolving power of the human eye at the intended magnification. (print size/viewing distance) Here the rule of 1/focal length is useful. 3. Non-disturbing shake. The image is "a bit"soft, but it is of no artistic consequence because of the subject matter (low contrast, not too much detail, interest, etc) Shuuterspeeds depend on technique, but may be as low as 1/2" 4. Shake but ignore- the subject matter has precedence over the technical aspects. 5. Deliberate blur - anything goes 6. Photo should be deleted.  Example of #5 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/173418-shutter-at-18-sharp-results/?do=findComment&comment=1936104'>More sharing options...
bill Posted February 24, 2012 Share #13 Â Posted February 24, 2012 1. Define "sharp". The word "acceptable" should come in there somewhere. 2. Don't drink alcohol, coffee or Red Bull 3. Don't smoke 4. Don't take drugs 5. Don't exert yourself - sex or running up stairs, for instance - just before taking a photo 6. Define "sharp" Â I know 1 and 6 are the same, but that is the crux of the matter. Â Regards, Â Bill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpattison Posted February 24, 2012 Share #14  Posted February 24, 2012 see http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/customer-forum/134546-leica-table-top-tripod-ball-head.html  a small table top tripod is pocketable, and can be used as a chest pod.  John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IWC Doppel Posted February 24, 2012 Share #15 Â Posted February 24, 2012 1/8 for me is 'okay' so long as subjects are still.... But I am personally not consistent at this speed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted February 24, 2012 Share #16 Â Posted February 24, 2012 For those who would like some empirical evidence of shutter speeds, hand-held, and various tripods you might look at "Edge of Darkness" by the late Barry Thornton, page 60. It is quite amazing to me how the choice of tripod makes quite a difference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
richam Posted February 24, 2012 Share #17 Â Posted February 24, 2012 Best bet, as already mentioned, is the little Leica table pod. I try to leave it on the camera in low-light situations -- it's easy to brace on most anything. But without it, the 2 second self-timer release may help a bit by eliminating finger motion. And brace arms against body and keep shoulder strap taut as possible. it's still difficult, and shooting digital at a higher ISO to allow for faster shutter speed is the solution I most often use. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted February 24, 2012 Share #18 Â Posted February 24, 2012 [...]2. Don't drink alcohol, [...] [...] Â I cannot resist this opportunity to mention that in all of the established medical literature, alcohol is mentioned as a temporary treatment for essential (or familial) tremor. That means having an ounce or two of alcohol a few minutes before expecting the tremors to diminish - not going on a jag. Â I share essential tremor with a former worker. His is much worse than mine and he dropped out of his career as a cinema tech because he cannot handle anything delicately. He is not a drinker but maybe a couple times a years he will go out with friends for a couple pints. He has to slide the glass along the bar or use a straw to drink the first pint. After the second pint his tremor is significantly suppressed - and naturally people tend to think he's an alcoholic. He is not. The alcohol works, but not for very long at all. (Mine is treated by high doses of Beta Blockers and in emergencies, Diazapan.) Â Back to photography! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobey bilek Posted February 24, 2012 Share #19  Posted February 24, 2012 Hold Your Camera like a Rifle - NikonCafe.com  Read it thoroughly and follow the links. There are no bad ideas there.  Rule of thumb, 1/focal length as shutter speed. 50 mm lens, 1/60 sec. You can go slower employing the techniques and they work some of the time,not always. Bracket.  Some people are better than others.  Some days you are better than others.  16x20 prints will require more than 4x6.  For 98% guarantee, 1/125 or 1/250 for a 50 mm lens.  For 100% every time for large prints, a good tripod. Not a cheapo with round aluminum tube legs that weighs 3 pounds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted February 24, 2012 Share #20 Â Posted February 24, 2012 For 100% every time for large prints, a good tripod. Not a cheapo with round aluminum tube legs that weighs 3 pounds. Â And carbon fiber? I was given a thorough tongue lashing when I met one of the designers at our composite fiber research lab and factory. I told him that simply copying round aluminum tripod legs in CF struck me as misdirected. He let me know that their best customers were cine companies who used CF for camera platforms. I left puzzled, but parted with "Well, I have a surveyor's wooden tripod modified to take a camera mount. It weighs a ton." and he said, "Well, sure, if you want to do it THAT way." (I love wood) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.