Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Regarding the Volvo 1800 - With the original ones (P1800)  the "P" stood for "prototype" and the cars were built by Jensen in the UK.  With the 1800S, the "S" stood for 'Sweden" and the cars were built there.  There was no P1800S. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Around 1970, I reassembled a 1951 Singer engined HRG from a number of boxes of bits, for a friend. As we had no manual, it was all a bit of guesswork. When I took it out for a drive, I could not believe how hard the ride was. It made the Morgan 4/4 I was using at the time, feel like a limousine. I took it down the road from our works in St Ives in Huntingdonshire to Brian Lister's shop, which was only a few miles away towards Cambridge, to ask his opinion, as I assumed I must have assembled the suspension totally wrongly. "Oh they're all like that and no you have got it just right" was Brian's comment." 

Wilson

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 5 Stunden schrieb stuny:

Regarding the Volvo 1800 - With the original ones (P1800)  the "P" stood for "prototype" and the cars were built by Jensen in the UK.  With the 1800S, the "S" stood for 'Sweden" and the cars were built there.  There was no P1800S. 

Stu,

they were assembled at Jensen (1961/62) but the bodies were always made at Pressed Steel, also for the swedish cars until 1969 when they moved tools to Sweden.

Basically you are „nearly“ right, but you might be surprised, there was a „P 1800 S“ in the first swedish model year 1963 (2.000 cars, year code B, production-# 6001-8000 produced from 04/63 to 07/63), see attached Volvo brochure. While the internal (longer) Volvo chassis code and the badge lost the P they still advertised it as P 1800 S. After 1963 (08/63 > = „64 model“) they were only called 1800S, 1800E, 1800ES.

Common name (also among owners/clubs) is „P1800 ….“ but you are right for the 1964 model and later. I must admit I followed that „wrong“ naming and promise I’ll try to avoid that for the future. Thanks for your good input here which let me dig in my archive and external sources.

First 3 prototypes were made at Frua in Italy. Then came 3 pre-production prototypes from Jensen. And Fissore made a 1965 fastback prototype.

„P 1800 S“ in front of the US embassy in Denmark.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

For a bit of a change not a car but a very famous vehicle. What is it, who did it belong to? 

Wilson

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by wlaidlaw
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I know that there were more than one of these (4 I think, but maybe more) so I'm not sure on the "who did it belong to" unless the answer is simply "C&O" ie the Chesapeake & Ohio railway. 

It's one of the  "Yellow Belly" Hudsons built to run to/from Washington DC with matching similarly "streamlined" cars I think. We headed to DC from New York last Saturday for the Presidents' Day weekend on the Acela service - streamlined in the modern minimal way but with none of the "presence" of this design...

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, stuny said:

Nigel -

The Acela is pretty and comfortable, but the road bed is not able to support even half the speed the train is designed to make.  Too bad - it's very civilized travel.

Tbh - and maybe we travelled in an older car set - it felt dated with clunky metal slide up tables and pleather seats. Not a patch on high speed services in Europe / Japan.
Coming back we couldn’t get Acela tickets as they were sold out so went business class on the regular NorthEast regional (25mins slower) and had better seats, more legroom I thought, and had only 2 other people in the whole car…very Covid friendly 😀

 

Edited by NigelG
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nigel, 

Correct a C&O L1 Hudson. These were converted from Pacific 4-6-2 engines to Hudson/Baltic 4-6-4 with longer boilers. There were actually five of them 490-to 494. They were successful at what they were designed for, pulling heavy passenger trains at high speeds. Given this they had a surprisingly short life of just over 10 years. The C&O was sufficiently happy with them to order more new (L2 and L2a Hudsons from Baldwins), which were the last passenger steam locomotives built in the USA. Again very short lives before being replaced with diesels, which were cheaper to run and service. This one, 490, is at the Baltimore Railroad Museum.

Your turn.

Wilson

PS for some odd reason I am having great difficulty adding images to post, either JPG or PNG, which I never normally have. They appear as just a black or white square. I will restart my laptop to see if that cures the problem. 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by wlaidlaw
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...