Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

vor 4 Stunden schrieb 250swb:

I think that is a big clue. So here goes, it's a Steyr-Puch 500.

Yes, you got the clue!

And yes, I did hide the doorhandle to make it not too easy.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by a.j.z
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice car, small engined Fiat's have always been a favourite of mine, you wind them up and just don't slow down (if possible), great fun. So your clue was clever, and I'd forgotten about the SEAT connection that Wilson came up with, so something learned.

I'll post a new one later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is this?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hoped the rear wheel would fool you all, but obviously not for long. Over to you Wilson..........

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am currently knee deep in water from the swimming pool filtration pump in my cellar, which is leaking into its electric motor (not good!) and the new pump which arrived this morning has different sized unions on it. So would be very grateful if someone could take over for me, while I try and sort this out. It doesn't help that swimming pools all still use inch size BSP unions, which the French insist in trying to convert into mm, which they don't do - a  2" BSP union actually has a internal diameter of 2.23" or 56.6mm not 2" = 50.8mm. Trying to explain that to the plumping supplies stockist isn't easy. 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry about the water damage...no fun at all.

How about a car from the 1950's with an available but unusual choice power plant.  Built in Glendale, California.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by m410
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure we can rely on John's encyclopedic knowledge.  I do wonder about the engine considering your comment.  The standard engine for the Indy 500 in that era was a monster V8 Offenhauser.  Perhaps this is Smokey Yunick's car with the "backward" Offy, rotating the "wrong" way?  If so it's a Kurtiss 500H

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is a Kurtis, but not a 500S, 500H or 1955-6.  The "standard engine choice, if there was such a thing, was the beautifully built Meyer-Drake Offenhauser Four Cylinder.   Smokey Yunick's cars had Chevrolet V8s.  This car does not have either of those engines.

Edited by m410
Link to post
Share on other sites

It all depends on which way up you have the Hallibrand quick change ratio back axle (highline or lowline input), as to which way you engine needs to rotate. Kurtis Kraft used all different V8 engines from Buick, Cadillac and Chrysler plus others. Since this one says Chrysler on the rocker covers and by the width of them, I believe this would have been a Firepower Hemi of 331 Cu.in, well originally. Of course cars used for historic racing end up with all different sizes of engines, although the FIA is getting a bit stricter, after some blatant cheating particularly in the single seater classes e.g. Formula Junior Oscas and Volpinis, especially from Italy were turning up with 1458cc and 1600 cc engines in place of the correct 1100. 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chrysler skunk works 331-CID Hemi from 1952 possibly in a Kurtis chassis.

 

Edit, you beat me with the explanation! Also after the Offy teams complained the Chrysler V8 was never competitive again and faded into history.

Edited by 250swb
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes this a Kurtis built by Frank Kurtis and it does have a 331ci Chrysler V8 from 1952.  Kurtis built a lot of different cars, what particular model is this one?  

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by m410
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the name plate really doesn't say it all, just as the Ford badge doesn't say it all on the front of a Mustang or a F250 Double Cab truck.

This particular car is one of the four Kurtis KK500A Roadsters built from1952 to 1953 and equipped with the previously and correctly mentioned 331ci Chysler V8.  Unfortunately, it never ran in or even qualified for the Indianapolis 500.  However, one of the other three 500A cars built by the end of 1953 eventually qualified for the big race a few years later.  The success of that car ironically was brought on by Offenhauser as they lobbied the AAA to reduce the engine size down to a maximum of 270ci (the exact displacemnt of Meyer-Drake's largest Indy engine).  Kurtis refitted one of the three other cars with the 270ci version of the Chysler V8.  The reduction in engine displacement proved beneficial to the big V8 as it wasn't so hard on itself.  Even though this car did qualify for a number of races, including the Indy 500, it was never highly competitive.  BUT, they were sure beautiful to look a

I photographed this elegantly restored car in the pits at Laguna Seca Raceway's Historic Races a few years back.
 

Someone else's turn.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by m410
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...