Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

The date suggests a Phantom II saloon, but I cannot recall seeing one with such a short body behind the windscreen.

 

Stuart, 

 

I think that was an optical illusion from the angle of taking but I suspect even so, it may be on the shorter 144" wheelbase used also in the Continental chassis. It is a Sedanca de Ville bodied Phantom II. I think from the appearance, the body might be by Hoopers or Barker. 

 

Wilson

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Michael, 

 

I rather like Phantom II's. Whereas no sports car (over 20 seconds 0-60MPH) and very heavy, a good one is a pleasant and quite easy car to drive. They were a big advance on the Phantom 1, which was really a tarted up Silver Ghost with overhead rather than side valves. The Ghost was a fantastic car in its time but it was designed in 1906 in the very early days of motoring but by the time the Phantom II came out in 1929, the Ghost/Phantom 1 was feeling very ponderous and elderly. The Ghost amazingly remained in production in Springfield in the USA until late 1926, two years after production had ceased in the UK and front wheel brakes were still an optional extra in that year. The equivalent Bentleys, the six and a half litre and eight litre cars, felt like they came from a different century. The Phantom II had synchromesh on 3rd and top gears, one of the first European cars to have this and the steering is far lighter than the P1 and Ghost. The main weakness of the P2 is the brakes. They were just too small for a 3 ton car and you have to be very careful on long descents (start at the top of the hill in the same gear that you came up the other side is the rule, just like on the earlier Ghosts). Again W.O. Bentley car brakes are far better and together with Alfa Romeo's have the best brakes of any 1920's cars. 

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely, Wilson, and no doubt the angle added to my confusion.  BTW:  A friend since I was about 10 is president of his Bentley club near San Francisco, and he has built, rebuilt and driven many Bentleys, including one he was preparing for a top speed record in Bonneville for his 70th birthday.  The damage the salt would have done dissuaded him from actually making the run.  I captured your brother's Speed Racer photo and sent it to my friend.  He used to have one and did a Blue Train run, I think in it.  Beautiful photo.

 

And now for something completely different: 

 

You can tell me the make, model and year, but the winner will identify who was its famous owner.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I feel I have rather been monopolising this thread so would prefer to leave it to anyone else who would like to post with a new mystery car.

 

That must be the most OTT car I have ever seen. I think even Elvis Presley would have been too shy to drive it.

 

"Excuse me sir, have you any weapons in your vehicle?"

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel I have rather been monopolising this thread so would prefer to leave it to anyone else who would like to post with a new mystery car.

 

That must be the most OTT car I have ever seen. I think even Elvis Presley would have been too shy to drive it.

 

"Excuse me sir, have you any weapons in your vehicle?"

 

A story involving this and a classic car:

 

License/number plates in the USA used to have the year they were valid stamped into them. Here in Missouri, and in several other states, if you can find a plate with a year matching the year of manufacture of your car you may register that plate to your vehicle. Both our 1971 and 1979 MGs have appropriately dated plates.

 

A couple of years ago my wife and I were pulled over by a young police officer who didn't know this law and was wondering why we were driving a car with plates that apparently expired in 1971.

 

One of his first questions was "do you have any weapons in the vehicle?" As it happened we were on the way home from the shooting range and as a collector of vintage weapons I had quite a few in the car.

 

Fortunately he realised a middle aged, apparently slightly eccentric couple didn't seem to be a threat to him and he was happy to learn about the guns and the Year of Manufacture plates on the car. :)

Edited by mikemgb
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm out of car pictures but if somebody wants to identify this:

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

While the truck is hollering along, I'll take this up if I may:

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Regards,

 

Christoph

Link to post
Share on other sites

Michael, 

 

For my taste you are much too close (the marque and roughly the time) much too early (in 5 hours 38 minutes)  :) .

However, you haven't quite hit the mark yet. 

 

Here some more views...

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

Regards

 

Christoph

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...