Jump to content

Is this a Billingham bag?


thompsonkirk

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I found this in an ad & bought it. It happens to be the best-fitting little bag for an M camera that I've ever found (having tried/bought a couple that didn't turn out to be quite right). it measures 10" H x 6" W x 4" D & has exactly enough room for a lens at the bottom (plus battery & extra SD) & an M9 with lens & in some instances lens hood & even external finder.

 

It looks nearly new. The label says Billingham, but with its orange plastic fittings & lack of pockets it doesn't look like anything on the website. Nor does it look like my battered 25-year-old B. leather 'purse.' Looks a bit like the Stowaway, but even more like a cheap knock-off such as you might find along with faux Rolexes in a discount booth at an airport.

 

While I'm not sure of its parentage, it's certainly useful & worth its price. The only thing wrong is it's too clean – needs some use & dirt to become inconspicuous.

 

Kirk

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kirk

 

Why don't you email Billingham directly and ask them. If its theirs (looks like it though the orange bits are odd) then I'm sure that they will let you know which product it is. If not then they should be aware of its existence! FYI I've visited their factory and they do or certainly did produce some adds and ends - I have an A4 Portfolio case originally intended for Kodak (it has Kodak embossed into the leather) which I bought whilst there and which I still use many years later on - and its only just looking a little used now. Excellent products - I've had many Billinghams one which became extremely disreputable and which now resides in the west of Ireland where I believe it is seeing out its days as a fishing bag! I now use a Hadley Pro for my Ms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The real thing says Billingham (not billingham)

England

and there is no flag on the real thing.

The Billingham leather is more substantial, the stitching is neater and they do not use plastic fittings to my knowledge.

But if it works ......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thank you Paul & Alun for your suggestion that I contact Billingham. Below is our correspondence, establishing that this is an ancient version of 'the real thing.'

 

Dear Mr Thompson

 

Thank you for your email and picture of the bag. I am pleased to advise

you the bag you have is called a 'Kiron' which was made by Billingham

over 20 years ago.

 

Kind regards

Bea

 

Kirk Thompson wrote:

I recently purchased this bag which is labeled 'billingham' (lower case

'b'). It has orange plastic fasteners and no pockets. Its sewing

doesn't match the quality of my very old bag made by your firm. So I am

guessing it is a 'knock off' or imitation.

 

I call your attention to it especially because it is such a practical

bag: It measures 10x6x4" and exactly fits a Leica M digital camera with

mounted lens; also one extra lens, with extra battery and memory cards.

It is the perfect fit that I'd been seeking. If this is not a real

Billingham bag, then I believe you should copy its dimensions in an

authentic version.

 

Kirk Thompson

 

-----

 

So I'm happy to have acquired a brand new Billingham 'antique' for 49 pounds!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You gotta believe me, Wilfredo. here it is as I'm using it: M9, 50 Summilux, 28 Summicron; also a couple of cards & a battery. The little black leather box at left is an external finder, because I wear glasses & can't see the 28 framelines.

 

It would also hold a 35 on the camera with hood attached, & a 75.

 

BUT you missed the bad news: It's a bag called a Kiron & I happened to stumble on a new/antique one. Billingham hasn't made them since the 1980s.

 

Since the size happens to be 'perfect,' i suggest you start one of those mass e-mail campaigns like folks send to their congressmen (or MPs?), asking Billingham to put 'em back in their product line.

 

K

 

(Whoops, sorry about image pallor – I forgot to convert properly for Web.)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Paul & Alun for your suggestion that I contact Billingham. Below is our correspondence, establishing that this is an ancient version of 'the real thing.'

 

Dear Mr Thompson

 

Thank you for your email and picture of the bag. I am pleased to advise

you the bag you have is called a 'Kiron' which was made by Billingham

over 20 years ago.

 

Kind regards

Bea

 

 

Well I got that one wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

USD $75 from RF Forum Classifieds. Looking at it carefully, I'm sure it was never used.

 

My 'take' is that Billingham made the highest quality from the start; but as a younger company they made some cheaper products too. Also, as pgk said, they made products for other labels/companies.

 

I have a great old purse modeled on an Australian schoolkid's book bag, ca.1980, with what would be the canvas parts of a book bag replaced with pigskin. I'm told that Billingham made these for Banana Republic (which was a better store back then). It has fine metal fittings & only in the last few years has begun to look a bit shabby, because I've worn through the edges of the webbed shoulder strap. I have a shoemaker who keeps it 'operational' for me. Thirty years of regular use is Quality!

 

K

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Billingham bag that was bought new 1978 and has seen me through a professional career and beyond. Its still usable today and carries my MF kit. They always made the good bags, but as Kirk says, they did make some cheaper products as well in those days. Compared to todays Billingham bags there is very little difference in materials or design.

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, but Kirk!

 

Photos are mere instants snatched from the stream, while this is history. :)

 

 

 

FWIW, I never read bag threads. But this one's title is reticent, questioning. Enticing, as bag posts go (IMO).

 

And the response is both yes and no--yes, a billingham, but no, not today's Billingham.

 

Ah, the ambiguities of life. :p

 

 

Moderators--Kirk's thread should be added to the Bag Hall of Fame posts subsection.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...