Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

M8 + Canon 50/1.2 - I was on the verge of selling this lens to fund a 35 Summicron ASPH or v4, but using it more, I can see it's quite a lovely lens... looks like my Summicron will take longer than expected:) Both shot in JPEG, first is cropped a little, second used Viveza to lighten up the face a bit. No other editing...

 

f8

4414371726_54c5c5d832.jpg

 

f1.2

4414371682_36e0461c4c.jpg

 

That second shot there is very nice.

I'm waiting on a canon 50/1.4 myself. I was tempted to go for a 50/1.2, but didn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Canon 85/2 "Serenar". This one is from 1950.

 

Wide-Open, Heliopan IR cut filter.

 

picture.php?albumid=222&pictureid=2271

 

And at F4:

picture.php?albumid=222&pictureid=2272

 

I used the lens with the 50/75 adapter, and the 75mm framelines are a very good match at distances over 4ft.

 

One more at F2.

picture.php?albumid=222&pictureid=2274

 

This lens is big and heavy, but this one is near mint and goes for ~$100.

Edited by brianv
Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently stumbled on a IIIf with some lenses in a box... I grabbed an adaptor and here's the first couple of shots playing around with what I found. The first is with a 1952 Elmar 3.5/50, the second is with a 1952 Hektor 4.5/135. While I found this an interesting exercise, the images, at least before any processing were very flat. Perhaps there's haze on the lenses, they don't look too bad though. The Elmar couples with the rangefinder, the Hektor doesn't and I'm guessing with the framing and the focus.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Hektar has an RF Cam on it- maybe need to be adjusted?

 

Also: thickness of the LTM to M-Mount adapters is critical for long lenses. I need to try my 135/4.5 Hektors on the M-8, one M-Mount and the other is LTM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Hektar has an RF Cam on it- maybe need to be adjusted?

 

Also: thickness of the LTM to M-Mount adapters is critical for long lenses. I need to try my 135/4.5 Hektors on the M-8, one M-Mount and the other is LTM.

 

Good thought, I wouldn't know where to send the Hektor to get the cam adjusted, it seems to focus way off with the viewfinder, but I just ordered a mount that is 135 specific. That may make the difference, I was using one that was 50 specific.

 

Thanks

 

LDH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Here's 2 from favorite piece of old glass.

 

Canon 0.95 "dream lens"

I think I got a good example of this, I know others complain of the bokeh being mushy, but I'm very happy with it. It spends a lot of time on my M8.2

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

...it seems to focus way off with the viewfinder, but I just ordered a mount that is 135 specific. That may make the difference, I was using one that was 50 specific...

 

shouldn't make a difference, in and of itself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nice stuff again...here another from my old Lux and M8.2

 

Tx

 

andy

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple with cars and Guy with beard both M8 with old silver 9cm f4 Elmar from '58 bought for just £45

 

Indoor shot M8 with a J8 from '77 shot at f2.8 bought for just £10

 

Something pleasing about getting passable shots from bargain basements stuff.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Noch einige Summarit-Aufnahmen, das Portrait mit f1.5, das Tor mit f4.0

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a couple of shots taken with my M8 and a $30.00 Jupiter-8 50/2 I bought at a local camera show:

 

The Guy With Too Many Soviet Lenses, Omaha Camera Show, March, 2010

4464233138_52a57bb267_b.jpg

 

Leica II, Omaha Camera Show, March, 2010

4463457185_8a8e20ab6b_b.jpg

 

Both are at f2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maggie, your Summaron is just plain wonderful! As to the Jupiters, which I like to call Russkie-Sonnars or Sonnarski... Sometimes you have to try several, or get someone like Brian to work his magic on them, but when you get a good one, mmmm!

 

The Sonnars are like time machines. Wide open is the 1930s, and each stop you close down moves the look ahead a decade or so.

 

Here's one from my J-8, probably mid-50s vintage. I like to close it down just a half stop, which improves it greatly without losing the characteristic look.

 

--Peter

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maggie, your Summaron is just plain wonderful! As to the Jupiters, which I like to call Russkie-Sonnars or Sonnarski... Sometimes you have to try several, or get someone like Brian to work his magic on them, but when you get a good one, mmmm!

 

The Sonnars are like time machines. Wide open is the 1930s, and each stop you close down moves the look ahead a decade or so.

 

 

Thanks, Peter! I'm really liking both lenses. The Jupiter-8 is on my M2 right now. Here's a photo of that rig, taken with my 70's 90/2.8 Tele-Elmarit:

 

4485840266_9250ab36a8_b.jpg

 

Say, any idea of how old that Jupiter-8 is? No clickstops on the aperture and all engraving is in English, if that helps with dating. The guy I bought it from had no idea about where or when it was made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

..........Say, any idea of how old that Jupiter-8 is? No clickstops on the aperture and all engraving is in English, if that helps with dating. The guy I bought it from had no idea about where or when it was made.

 

Generally, the first two numbers in the serial number of Soviet lenses denote the year of manufacture. Yours seems to be 1974. Latin alphabet (as opposed to cyrillic alphabet) engraving identifies the lens as one made for export outside of the USSR - rumour had it that those lenses went through a more rigorous quality control process.

 

Best,

 

Jan

Edited by doubice
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...