Jump to content

Have I gone mad or?


Recommended Posts

White - it should be white!:p

Nah... a good Safari like this I think can bring 2500 $ minimum.. are you interested ? I accept bids into the above sum (or around... lens not included, of course... :D)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes (but SOMETIMES only...) we Italians do think that NOT ALWAYS we must complain not to be British...:)

 

Not complaining, its making my vegetables grow :)

 

.... as long as it stops before I go on holiday!

 

Gerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of interest, if full frame is impossible for the M, how come some sort of short extension/correction lens cant be built onto the body to provide clearance? In theory I mean, I dont want to start an "I woudlnt spit on it' debate from the must have M6classic body shape purists.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Visoflex looks about an inch long, how does that manage different lenses?

That is a mechanical thing - like an extension ring, and Visoflex lenses are laid out with a longer register. So there are no optics between the lens and the film (sensor). And before you ask- an extender works through cropping the image - something quite different from changing the register length of a lens by adding an optical system behind it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Visoflex looks about an inch long, how does that manage different lenses?

 

There were proper lenses built for usage on the Visoflex, i.e. with a flange to focus plane distance equal to Visoflex length+Leica body : they were tipically the "long" teles 200 280 400 etc, plus some "specials" like the Elmar 65, the Hektor 125 etc.

Moreover, some Leitz lenses (90s & 135s) could have the lens group unscrewed from the std. mount, fitted onto some proper adapter, and the combo resulted into a lens to be used on Visoflex for standard usage (i.e. focusing to infinity and nearer distances). Finally, almost any Leica lens could be mounted "as is" on Visoflex, becoming de facto a macro lens, not being able of course to focus to infinity due to Visoflex length.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Because every lens has a different exit angle, so the correction lens would have to be different for each lens.

 

Given how many different adapters they made for the Visoflex system, I can't see that minor issue holding Leica back, can you?

 

dpstjp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given how many different adapters they made for the Visoflex system, I can't see that minor issue holding Leica back, can you?

 

dpstjp

 

Adapters for Visoflex, even if finely engineered as Leitz did at that times, are simply metal rings, after all (the most "complex" were indeed the focusing rings like OTZFO) . A SET of proper lenses for the prospected usage would be a much different biz... and a mess to manage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...