Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Wondering if anyone else has ever experienced extreme vignetting on select frames? It’s on the negative so not a scanning issue. I use a summilux 35mm 1.4. At first I thought it was a battery issue but it still happens even with a fresh battery. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

x
11 minutes ago, andybarton said:

Welcome to the forum!

Which lens hood do you use?

This Leica 12465 lens hood! 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, andybarton said:

Welcome to the forum!

Which lens hood do you use?

Looks more like shutter issue to me, but irregular shape is quite odd. Looks as if the shutter traveled slower in the mid of the frame than along borders. Run few tests with ground glass/can be a piece of blank negative, check different distances. You can try to record shutter movement in high speed mode on your phone. But if it’s not hood or filter related I’d seek professional help. 
additionaly this banding on the sky doesn’t look right, can you post a photo of negative with perforations and inter frame space? 

Edited by Carlos cruz
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

18 minutes ago, Carlos cruz said:

Looks more like shutter issue to me, but irregular shape is quite odd. Looks as if the shutter traveled slower in the mid of the frame than along borders. Run few tests with ground glass/can be a piece of blank negative, check different distances. You can try to record shutter movement in high speed mode on your phone. But if it’s not hood or filter related I’d seek professional help. 
additionaly this banding on the sky doesn’t look right, can you post a photo of negative with perforations and inter frame space? 

Appreciate your insight!That’s what I was thinking too… Hard to see much detail in these but hopefully that helps. It happens so seldomly that I’ve overlooked it but when it does happens it’s so hard to ignore. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at negs of 20 and 21, hard to see here but is there a symmetry to the "vignetting" across the separation line? 

I am thinking maybe a light leak? When I had a light leak, it was on some frames but not others and all depended on how I held the camera and squeezed

Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Carlos cruz said:

Looks more like shutter issue to me, but irregular shape is quite odd.

 

There are dark streaks across the negative as in the seascape and gulls in photo 3, so maybe shutter, but the desire for people to always want to use a Summilux wide open can introduce other problems such as vignetting. So I think its primarily shutter drag but the streaks also point to a light leak in the shutter blind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 250swb said:

There are dark streaks across the negative as in the seascape and gulls in photo 3, so maybe shutter, but the desire for people to always want to use a Summilux wide open can introduce other problems such as vignetting. So I think it’s primarily shutter drag but the streaks also point to a light leak in the shutter blind.

 

24 minutes ago, Sandokan said:

Looking at negs of 20 and 21, hard to see here but is there a symmetry to the "vignetting" across the separation line? 

I am thinking maybe a light leak? When I had a light leak, it was on some frames but not others and all depended on how I held the camera and squeezed

But there’s no proof of light leak or vignetting on the negative. Maybe slightest vignetting but nothing close to one you can see on positive. I blame the scanner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Carlos cruz said:

 

But there’s no proof of light leak or vignetting on the negative. Maybe slightest vignetting but nothing close to one you can see on positive. I blame the scanner.

The negatives looks like an A4 scan on the flatbed or a phone photo .... how does vignetting happen there? As Alyson says "it is on the negative" which means they can see it with the eye. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Carlos cruz said:

 

But there’s no proof of light leak or vignetting on the negative. Maybe slightest vignetting but nothing close to one you can see on positive. I blame the scanner.

I self scan at home using negative lab supply. I just re-scanned the image to double check and got the same result (and the rest of the roll is totally normal). You really can’t tell in the images I sent but if you look really closely at the negative in person you can indeed see the lighter areas indicating the vignetting is on the negative. The striations are also on the negative. 
 

Not ruling out it being a scanning issue but seems unlikely? I’ve been self scanning for the last 4 years and feel like I’ve ruled out user error 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like you can see the vignetting more clearly in this negative

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually the colour of the vignette looks odd for typical hood/finger in the frame thing, if it was true we should see a bright yellow blotches on the negs too. I think the bamding we can see on the sea birds photo is very telling, it looks like scanner camera moving along and struggling with something(?) can’t tell if it was some internal reflection or some dust.  I am shooting in the dark here. From my experience negs should look different to give you such strong effect. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Carlos cruz said:

 

But there’s no proof of light leak or vignetting on the negative. Maybe slightest vignetting but nothing close to one you can see on positive. I blame the scanner.

The dark streaks in the sky in photo #3, if they aren’t incompetent scanning they are a light leak. Good grief can’t you see them? And given they are not orange in colour they must be coming from the shutter side of the film.

 

Edited by 250swb
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Alysonhallphoto said:

I self scan at home using negative lab supply. I just re-scanned the image to double check and got the same result (and the rest of the roll is totally normal). You really can’t tell in the images I sent but if you look really closely at the negative in person you can indeed see the lighter areas indicating the vignetting is on the negative. The striations are also on the negative. 
 

Not ruling out it being a scanning issue but seems unlikely? I’ve been self scanning for the last 4 years and feel like I’ve ruled out user error 

 

22 minutes ago, Alysonhallphoto said:

I feel like you can see the vignetting more clearly in this negative

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

This one definitely shows some vignetting unless it’s the side  of the mattress not getting any dialect light. The problem with vignetting theory is that the shape of your vignette changes,  similar shape is on in some pics on the left, on the others on the right. Are you sure there’s no chance of stray light pr something with your scanning setup? 
https://forums.negativelabpro.com/t/solution-found-for-blue-vignetting-on-negative-scans/2452/5

Found this link and I believe it describes similar problem. Probably something in optical path of scanning camera amplified by software lens recognition or lack of it. 

12 minutes ago, 250swb said:

The dark streaks in the sky in photo #3, if they aren’t incompetent scanning they are a light leak. Good grief can’t you see them?

I’ve never seen black light leaks before

Edited by Carlos cruz
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Carlos cruz said:

 

I’ve never seen black light leaks before

I've adjusted the levels to make them easier to see, and at even greater contrast they go across the whole negative.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, 250swb said:

I've adjusted the levels to make them easier to see, and at even greater contrast they go across the whole negative.

I’d still answer that I haven’t seen black light leaks before. We are seeing here a positive picture, not a slide, not a negative.  
As those marks are close to middle of the film I’d rather suspect scratches from hanger when drying (usually occurring closer to frame 18, I usually judge film labs based on those) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...