Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi everyone,

I have recently bought a Leica and sent it to CLA. The mechanic sent me a video of the inside and I noticed an engraving that I don't recall being the standard in M3s. To me, it either looks like a `W' or a stylized '12' (at least, this would explain the hook on the left side). Does anybody know the meaning of that ?

Thanks a lot in advance!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hipotesis : "Personal ID" of some worker, who maybe realized, at assembly or test task, that a component was slightly out of specs : corrected it and kept track of the job.

Such scratchings are not so rare, expecially on Barnacks, as far as I remember, Some of the real experts in the Forum can surely give more detailed explanations.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, luigi bertolotti said:

Hipotesis : "Personal ID" of some worker, who maybe realized, at assembly or test task, that a component was slightly out of specs : corrected it and kept track of the job.

Such scratchings are not so rare, expecially on Barnacks, as far as I remember, Some of the real experts in the Forum can surely give more detailed explanations.

I have scratchings like this on a number of items in my collection. I always assume they were done in the factory at manufacture stage or by repair persons later on.

William 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, luigi bertolotti said:

Hipotesis : "Personal ID" of some worker, who maybe realized, at assembly or test task, that a component was slightly out of specs : corrected it and kept track of the job.

Such scratchings are not so rare, expecially on Barnacks, as far as I remember, Some of the real experts in the Forum can surely give more detailed explanations.

This is a very plausible hypothesis. To provide some more context: according to the technician currently servicing my Leica, the camera has never been opened since its production in 1966. He bases this on the fact that the L-seal remains intact. While one could speculate that a skilled technician might have opened it and carefully resealed it, I’m not sure if that’s even possible. In any case, the most likely explanation right now is that the mark was left by a factory worker.

On that note, has anyone here ever contacted Leica and received a meaningful response? I wonder if they keep records of "signatures" that could be traced back to their workers. Then again, I may be overestimating their level of meticulousness.

Edited by Wcuriosity
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Sandokan said:

I would expect an engraving to be exactly that. A machined set of letters, but this looks like it was scratched on. 

Of course, forgive my sloppiness. I fully agree with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

4 hours ago, willeica said:

I have scratchings like this on a number of items in my collection. I always assume they were done in the factory at manufacture stage or by repair persons later on.

William 

Have you ever contacted Leica or an expert who could give you a qualified assessment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
vor 5 Stunden schrieb willeica:

I always assume they were done in the factory at manufacture stage or by repair persons later on

this is the best guess nowadays. Various numbers/characters are scratched , here some examples, meaning will remain unclear. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Interesting is however what I found on many wartime IIIc, pencil written. Found on cameras purchased from various countries, I assume this was written in manufacturing by the person who either assembled the shutter or checked/adjusted speeds

Edited by jerzy
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 3/26/2025 at 2:48 PM, jerzy said:

this is the best guess nowadays. Various numbers/characters are scratched , here some examples, meaning will remain unclear. 

Interesting is however what I found on many wartime IIIc, pencil written. Found on cameras purchased from various countries, I assume this was written in manufacturing by the person who either assembled the shutter or checked/adjusted speeds

In those last three pictures I’m sure you agree that the first two are probably by the same person and the third was by someone else so it is likely to be systematic and not personal. I doubt it’s a measurement as it is unlikely you would end up with 51 three times if it was something that could vary (unless you have lots of 50 and 52 too 🙂 ).  I suspect it’s a status code with a meaning or maybe some way of identifying a machine used (shutter tester 51?). Just thinking aloud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 250swb said:

Alternatively it could be a version of ‘Kilroy was here’, just to mark a technicians efforts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilroy_was_here

I’m sure it’s possible but why would two different technicians put the same number; the handwriting is clearly different. 
I have two WWII IIIcs in my repair pile and I’m tempted to disrobe them to check if I have similar; but I have a load of pre war stuff to get working first. TBC maybe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Woodallp said:

I’m sure it’s possible but why would two different technicians put the same number; the handwriting is clearly different. 
I have two WWII IIIcs in my repair pile and I’m tempted to disrobe them to check if I have similar; but I have a load of pre war stuff to get working first. TBC maybe.

It may simply be a 'sign off' mark that something has been checked before it is passed down to the next stage in the production line. After all this is before the days of bar codes etc. that regulate the build process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 10 Stunden schrieb Woodallp:

have two WWII IIIcs in my repair pile

two is rather small representative sample. I have a sample of more than  20, out of them 6 have "51" . The other have  nothing or some not identified characters. "51" was written on cameras produced in 1941/42 however there are cameras from the same period of time with nothing written. With the amount of cameras produced there must have been more than one person doing thse same activities (assembling, testing, etc).

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

364xxx : 50 IV

371xxx  :  II  (pictured here)

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...