Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Advertisement (gone after registration)

The specs of the Visoflex 2 state that it gives 100% frame coverage, but I was out this morning with a 28mm Elmarit and I framed up a shot to exclude some branches right at the edge of frame. In the viewfinder, the frame was clean - but in playback the branches were showing on the edge of the frame. It's funny because I haven't used the M11 with a tripod before and there are times where I swear I had it exactly right in the viewfinder but the final frame was unclean on the edges... I thought it was just me twitching as I hit the shutter but now I know. 

So I thought.. ok the M11 must be applying lens correction to the embedded jpg preview in the raw file, but when I imported the DNG into Lightroom and disabled profile corrections, it made adjustments but didn't go back to the image I had originally framed. 


I remember reading something I while back about corrections being imbedded into the DNG and being unable to disable them... is this what's happening? Or is the Visoflex really not showing 100% of the frame?

Edited by Stevejack
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the lens is corrected digitally like many lenses, especially wideangles,  are from all brands it is quite normal for an uncorrected image to have some pixels to play with at the edges for distortion correction and quite logical for the EVF to show the framing of the corrected image. The cameras of the Q series are a pronounced example; the EVF and corrected output have an AOV of a 28 mm lens but the sensor captures pixels for a 26 mm one. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, jaapv said:

If the lens is corrected digitally like many lenses, especially wideangles,  are from all brands it is quite normal for an uncorrected image to have some pixels to play with at the edges for distortion correction and quite logical for the EVF to show the framing of the corrected image. The cameras of the Q series are a pronounced example; the EVF and corrected output have an AOV of a 28 mm lens but the sensor captures pixels for a 26 mm one. 

Hmm. I didn't think the M did anything if lens detection was turned off. Seems a bit strange, it's either reading the code on the lens and still applying some form of correction for wide angle ...or the visoflex isn't showing me the full image. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If lens detection is turned off in the camera it should not correct, However if you turn off the profile in LR and the camera lens detection not, the camera will still embed the corrections in the DNG and apply them in the camera software. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

That was my assumption too, so I just ran some tests. 

When lens detection is on in camera:
There is a difference between visoflex and playback framing (the visoflex is a cropped view of the final recorded image). 
In lightroom, checking the profile corrections tickbox does make adjustments to the image but does not affect framing in the same way (i.e. the image isn't cropped in all around the edges). 

When lens detection is off in camera:
There is still a difference between visoflex and playback framing, with the visoflex being a cropped view of the recorded image). 
In lightroom, checking the profile corrections tickbox does nothing.. but the recorded image is still the wider view which wasn't visible in the visoflex when the capture was made. 

In both cases, the visoflex displays only a cropped live-view version of the actual recorded image.  And just now testing things, looking on the back of the camera.... the live view is cropped too. It's not a visoflex issue but a live view issue. 

**edit: on closer examination the two sides of the frame are what's being cropped, not the top and bottom of the frame

**edit: tested with a voigtlander 35mm lens, same deal: the edges are cropped off in live-view in the same way. 

Edited by Stevejack
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Advertisement (gone after registration)

17 minutes ago, lct said:

I have no experience with LR but i would check that perspective control is off.

Yes perspective control is off. I generally have most of those things disabled and I've been looking to see if maybe something similar is switched on by mistake. 

It's definitely a live-view issue not a visoflex issue, and seems to be apparent on different lenses (though I can't test the rest until tonight). 

I'm also just in the process of updating from 2.1.X to 2.2.0 so we'll see if that makes a difference. **Edit: no difference on latest firmware

Edited by Stevejack
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Smogg said:

Visoflex stabilizes the image using digital correction, so the frame edges may be slightly inaccurate.

Ahh interesting. I'm not sure this is the case here though as it's only the sides being cut off, not the vertical. In any case is there a way to turn this live-view stabilization off? Especially for tripod work? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stevejack said:

Ahh interesting. I'm not sure this is the case here though as it's only the sides being cut off, not the vertical. In any case is there a way to turn this live-view stabilization off? Especially for tripod work? 

I don't think this feature can be turned off.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Smogg said:

Visoflex stabilizes the image using digital correction, so the frame edges may be slightly inaccurate.

Can you point me to the literature that says that? 

The M11 does not have stabilization and it is quite a complicated feature that would be hard to fit in an eyepiece. Not impossible I guess. 

When attaching a 600mm lens to the SL3, you can see the effect of turning stabilization on and off, but on the M11-P with Visoflex, there is nothing stable about the image - at least on my system. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, Sandokan said:

Can you point me to the literature that says that? 

The M11 does not have stabilization and it is quite a complicated feature that would be hard to fit in an eyepiece. Not impossible I guess. 

When attaching a 600mm lens to the SL3, you can see the effect of turning stabilization on and off, but on the M11-P with Visoflex, there is nothing stable about the image - at least on my system. 

Key Specifications of M11

60MP BSI CMOS sensor with dual gain design

Multi-field (matrix) light metering

ISO 64 - 50,000

Three Raw resolution options (60MP, 36MP, 18MP)

SD card accessible from battery compartment (no removable base plate)

64Gb of internal memory

Exposures up to 1 hour, e-shutter down to 1/16,000 sec

Live view stabilization (digital shake correction of preview image)

Compatible with Visoflex II 3.68M-dot tilting accessory EVF
 

Image stabilization occurs not only in the EVF, but also on the external screen.

Edited by Smogg
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Stevejack said:

It might just be a stabilized view when magnified?

 

I haven't looked into the nuances of when stabilization is enabled. But if there is digital stabilization, the image boundaries will inevitably narrow a little. After you mentioned it, I assumed that stabilization is the reason for this.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Smogg said:

Key Specifications of M11

...

Live view stabilization (digital shake correction of preview image)

Compatible with Visoflex II 3.68M-dot tilting accessory EVF
 

Image stabilization occurs not only in the EVF, but also on the external screen.

Thank you, I did not know that. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...