Jump to content

A new Sigma 24-70/2.8 v2 or used Leica 24-70/2.8?


Recommended Posts

x

I see some tests stating that the optical difference between V1 and V2 are pretty marginal and not likely to show up in practice. However, some of the complaints against V1 was a litte poor autofocus, and it was slower than Leica to wake up when the camera was turned on. This appears to be fixed with V2, in addition to lower weight. A lot speaks in favour of Sigma.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Leicalook said:

@Ivar B

Thanks a lot. So far I saw "premium" and self-chosen titles. The "sponsoring" was new to me.

I still think about going for "premium"... Maybe I will do that some day...

 

Best wishes 

Stefan

 

And SORRY for off-topic! :ph34r:

No worries. This is not something I have added on my own. I think it was automatically recorded some years back. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Virob said:

What makes the Leica preferable for you?

Better ergonomics (in line with my other Leica L lenses) and better look, similar IQ, no extra buttons that cannot be used with SL3.

The weight difference (typically matters) is too small to matter when combined with an SL3 body.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jaapv said:

In the event that a lens has to be repaired the Sigma will be back in a matter of days, a coupe of weeks at the most. In case of the Leica it will be AWOL for half a year.

I hope you are mistaken, but most probably you are not. I just sent my 24-70 to Leica for repair. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jaapv said:

In the event that a lens has to be repaired the Sigma will be back in a matter of days, a coupe of weeks at the most. In case of the Leica it will be AWOL for half a year.

I think many people tend to forget that or simply are unaware of when buying Leica equipment.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, WvE said:

I think many people tend to forget that or simply are unaware of when buying Leica equipment.  

Yes, there is no doubt that you are correct. As I said I just sent my 24-70 for repair and I have an 24-90 as well so no urgency at all, but when someone with an M body for example needs to have something repaired and maybe the camera is used almost daily, being told that a repair is 5 months is completely unacceptable. Nobody else will get away with this state of affairs. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...