Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

9 minutes ago, sebben said:

@Mikko Kankainen

So if one uses AF-C the viewfinder drops resolution dramatically? I don’t get how this can be the case on a camera costing this much… Does it have a slower 60fps mode that doesn’t drop resolution? 

Yes it does, not dramatically but clearly. And another one thing that only few mentions.

Absolutely a show stopper for me for example in studio work. Tried last friday with 1 year photo shoot and at least I cannot see clearly if he/she is starting to smile. EVF is "blurry". And it's fine in everyday shooting but in critical studio work well at least for me no go. Even in ice hockey, I use SL2s because I can see clearly what I'm shooting.

And I get it that this does no affact to some, but I find it very strange.

Edited by Mikko Kankainen
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mikko Kankainen said:

 Tried last friday with 1 year photo shoot and at least I cannot see clearly if he/she is starting to smile. EVF is "blurry".

I think this is overstating the issue. But I agree the EVF experience and overall performance in AFC is not what you would expect from a 7k$ camera in 2024.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, la1402 said:

I think this is overstating the issue. But I agree the EVF experience and overall performance in AFC is not what you would expect from a 7k$ camera in 2024.

It maybe is and mainly because I cannot write in english what I mean. It is however blurry, you have to trust that camera has locked focus, you cannot see clearly. 
 

And every professional knows how important it is to see clearly every detail in persons face. At least I cannot work in afc in portraits so it’s contrast focusing for me. 

Edited by Mikko Kankainen
Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone mentioned otherwise a few weeks ago (I have to find the post), but wouldn’t it make sense for focus to take priority over shutter release in AF-C?  Meaning if you depress the shutter in AF-C, shouldn’t the camera not capture the image unless focus is obtained?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

3 minutes ago, Dr. G said:

Someone mentioned otherwise a few weeks ago (I have to find the post), but wouldn’t it make sense for focus to take priority over shutter release in AF-C?  Meaning if you depress the shutter in AF-C, shouldn’t the camera not capture the image unless focus is obtained?

It may be different in professional circumstances, but I rather have the right moment over perfect focus for people shots, if I had to chose. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, LocalHero1953 said:

Where is the info source that the S5ii (and SL3) use just CDAF in AFs?

The Panasonic & SL3 specs say they still uses DFD, but neither say which system they use for AFs or AFc.. 

Read the TIPA awards: The S5ii earns "Best Expert Camera" on basis of its AF (and Video properties)

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, sebben said:

@Mikko Kankainen

So if one uses AF-C the viewfinder drops resolution dramatically? I don’t get how this can be the case on a camera costing this much… Does it have a slower 60fps mode that doesn’t drop resolution? 

Unfortunately this is an issue with all cameras that use PDAF based AF.  My Sony’s (A1 and A7rV) exhibit it.  I’ve also seen other camera brands have the same issue.  However some do a better job at reducing the aliasing and fuzziness than others.  Still don’t know why it’s tied to the AF system but because I see it in other cameras it’s no longer a show stopper for me.  Have to live with it or work around it.   I do believe Sony’s A9 III with global shutter seems to have fixed it.  Maybe a combination of shutter and processing?
For studio work I plan to use M lenses and focus manually which will keep my EVF clear.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the S5ii on AFC. I was going to post all 24 test shots I did that day, using the Sigma 150-600 but  it got boring as there was not one shot OOF. Totally random selection, mainly in burst mode and zooming. (Human/animal recognition, Field.) I fail to see what is wrong...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jaapv said:

This is the S5ii on AFC. I was going to post all 24 test shots I did that day, using the Sigma 150-600 but  it got boring as there was not one shot OOF. Totally random selection, mainly in burst mode and zooming. (Human/animal recognition, Field.) I fail to see what is wrong...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Aperture and focal length?

S5ii consistently misfocus eyes about 10-20 cm when using Sigma 70-200 @f2.8 and at 100+mm, and in high speed mode. (Similar with other lenses). At f4-5.6, things are ok. SL3 is better at finding eye focys, but limited to 4 (or 5) fps in AFc.

Edited by helged
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jaapv said:

I am not sure how that paper proves that lower resolution sensors have better focus and accuracy and speed. When looking at Sony and Nikon low/high resolution offerings (Z7 vs Z6, a7riv vs a7iv), there does not seem to be any relevant difference in focusing speed and accuracy.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, helged said:

Aperture and focal length?

S5ii consistently misfocus eyes about 10-20 cm when using Sigma 70-200 @f2.8 and at 100+mm, and in high speed mode. (Similar with other lenses). At f4-5.6, things are ok. SL3 is better at finding eye focys, but limited to 4 (or 5) fps in AFc.

I would say that warrants a trip to Panasonic 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, helged said:

In that case I should return two S5ii-bodies to Panasonic.

Possibly - or maybe Sigma is the culprit? Obviously some kind of communication mismatch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...