frame-it Posted March 10, 2024 Share #21 Posted March 10, 2024 Advertisement (gone after registration) 17 hours ago, SrMi said: Why would PDAF use considerably more power than DFD? i wonder bout that too, shouldn't it be the other way around? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 10, 2024 Posted March 10, 2024 Hi frame-it, Take a look here How is your SL3 battery life experience?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
rim_light Posted March 10, 2024 Share #22 Posted March 10, 2024 The first time I used it, the battery lasted almost an entire football match. I only had to change the battery five minutes before the end. With the old batteries, only two continuous shots per second are possible, which is a bit low. It's good that more new batteries are already on their way to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrMi Posted March 10, 2024 Author Share #23 Posted March 10, 2024 7 hours ago, padam said: Because that is the main difference between the G9II and GH6, former being significantly worse regarding battery life (despite being similar on the specs sheet). There are many other differences between the G9II and GH6. Also, G9II has a longer battery life than GH6 per CIPA standard test (390 vs 360). No, using PDAF instead of CDAF has no relevant influence on battery life. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MediaFotografie Posted March 10, 2024 Share #24 Posted March 10, 2024 during the test we tried all possible settings to find out, which are better for battery life; of corse "WLAN off" is important, all others (incl. 120Hz EVF) have no great impact... 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MakinMemories Posted March 11, 2024 Share #25 Posted March 11, 2024 19 hours ago, Smogg said: I don't see a big problem with the low energy efficiency of the new camera. For decades, photographers shot on film that contained only 36 frames and quickly replaced the used film. A battery that gives 300-400 frames can be replaced much faster than film Yes! And film was sooooo expensive as well! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simone_DF Posted March 11, 2024 Share #26 Posted March 11, 2024 On 3/10/2024 at 8:12 AM, Smogg said: I don't see a big problem with the low energy efficiency of the new camera. For decades, photographers shot on film that contained only 36 frames and quickly replaced the used film. A battery that gives 300-400 frames can be replaced much faster than film Yeah, and for millennia people have used horses. But I prefer a car. “at my times…” it’s not an excuse in 2024. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlashGordonPhotography Posted March 11, 2024 Share #27 Posted March 11, 2024 Advertisement (gone after registration) Approx 450 shots today. Battery red but not shut down. Included downloading half the images via USB C and about ten minutes connected to Fotos. A bit better than I expected from early reports. Not at Sony level though. I get about 700 shots from my A7R5. Gordon 2 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BernardC Posted March 11, 2024 Share #28 Posted March 11, 2024 36 minutes ago, FlashGordonPhotography said: Approx 450 shots today. Battery red but not shut down. Included downloading half the images via USB C and about ten minutes connected to Fotos. A bit better than I expected from early reports. Not at Sony level though. I get about 700 shots from my A7R5. 450 is a decent amount already, and it's probably going to get better. On one hand, you should be able to fine-tune your power management settings to match your workflow, and on the other hand, future firmware should optimize power use. That's been the case with previous SL bodies: we got more battery life from firmware updates. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrMi Posted March 11, 2024 Author Share #29 Posted March 11, 2024 1 hour ago, FlashGordonPhotography said: Approx 450 shots today. Battery red but not shut down. Included downloading half the images via USB C and about ten minutes connected to Fotos. A bit better than I expected from early reports. Not at Sony level though. I get about 700 shots from my A7R5. Gordon Thanks for sharing. It seems that I should get through a typical day (non-wildlife photography) with one spare battery, as I do with every camera. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simone_DF Posted March 11, 2024 Share #30 Posted March 11, 2024 450 shots is a good starting point Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlashGordonPhotography Posted March 12, 2024 Share #31 Posted March 12, 2024 And that was testing the standby function. Turned the camera off when travelling place to place and standby when walking around. Gordon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
T.J. Posted March 12, 2024 Share #32 Posted March 12, 2024 Easy way to DOUBLE your battery life! 1. Place a second battery in a nice little Think Tank battery holder. 2. Place battery holder in pocket. These batteries are small and compact, thus really easy to carry around. And, I really like the compatibility with the Q3. I often have both camera's with me and having the same battery and charger makes it really simple. I'm looking forward to getting the new dual battery charger when available. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Photoworks Posted March 12, 2024 Share #33 Posted March 12, 2024 1 hour ago, T.J. said: Easy way to DOUBLE your battery life! 1. Place a second battery in a nice little Think Tank battery holder. 2. Place battery holder in pocket. These batteries are small and compact, thus really easy to carry around. And, I really like the compatibility with the Q3. I often have both camera's with me and having the same battery and charger makes it really simple. I'm looking forward to getting the new dual battery charger when available. It is in store in NY, I just didn't get it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now