What’s your most reacquired lens?

[RexGig0]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Having added the Leica M system in April 2018, so being new to Leica, I have yet to sell any M-mount lenses, but, am contemplating a “thinning of the herd,” so, am reading the replies, for reasons LUF members have sold lenses, and, any resulting regrets, to use as guidance.

 

[Advertisement]

The Leica Q3 is available for pre-order at B&H Photo Video and Adorama

[adan]

On 11/13/2023 at 2:32 PM, evikne said:

But after a while I forget why I sold it last time, and thus I buy it again … 🤪

Keep a diary, like Edward Weston. ("May 3, 20xx - sold my 50mm Summilux ASPH because......").  😁

https://www.amazon.com/Daybooks-Edward-Weston-Volumes-California/dp/0893814458

[Cronilux]

vor 1 Stunde schrieb RexGig0:

Having added the Leica M system in April 2018, so being new to Leica, I have yet to sell any M-mount lenses, but, am contemplating a “thinning of the herd,” so, am reading the replies, for reasons LUF members have sold lenses, and, any resulting regrets, to use as guidance.

 

Remember one thing: „never sell a Leica lens!“. Put them on a shelf. They won’t become cheaper, ever. 
 

Camera bodies okay, but selling lenses is just a mistake. 

[RayD28]

I had a 50mm Summicron V5 for about a year.  Great lens but I sold it to fund a 50mm Summilux ASPH V1.  That lens never disappoints but I missed having a 50 that is a bit smaller so I bought a 50mm Summicron V4, which optically is the same as the V5.  It's now my most used lens.  

[Pierre68]

As a hobbyist musician I have a lot of stories like that about guitars...

But regarding Leica lenses I have just one: When I finally got the money to buy a nice used f/0.95 Noctilux, I got one in the local photo store and used it just a few time before finding the lens was definitely too big and cumbersome for the M... And honestly it was hard to nail focus with this lens on a rangefinder. So I traded it for a brand new f/1.2 Noctilux that I really love fore the size and dual personality (wide open vs stopped down). 

But then I happened to pass by the store window from time to time and I was seeing my f/0.95 Noctilux sitting there and not being sold... for months. So after about a year I finally got into the store and negotiated a VERY good bargain to get it back...

And now I use it on the SL2-S with focus assist and it has become one of my favorite lens for this camera. 

[overexposed]

18mm SE, have my second copy now

[overexposed]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

24 minutes ago, gigithephotographer said:

Leica Q2. Just bought my sixth copy. It usually doesn’t last two months until I get rid of it again. 

the reason being?

[JoshuaR]

4 hours ago, gigithephotographer said:

Leica Q2. Just bought my sixth copy. It usually doesn’t last two months until I get rid of it again. 

I’m exactly the same, except my current copy is my third. The camera fills a practical niche in my hobby. But I just don’t like using it as much as my M system. The first time, I sold my Q2 for a 35 FLE. The second time, I traded it for 50 Lux. Now that I have all the lenses I want, I’m thinking of using the Q2 in a trade to upgrade my M10 into an M10-R or M11.

[dem331]

In 24 years with Leica I have sold 3 lenses.

MATE v1. - glad to see the back of it.

Noctilux Canada - no regrets.

21mm f2.8 asph - thinking of buying it again. Or the super elmar maybe.  

[rtai]

1) Noctilux F1. I lost count how many I bought and sold. Didn’t lose that much money because prices kept going up. I tried I really tried even using it as a one lens kit overseas. 
2) MATE. First the 55mm version. Too much blockage. Slow aperture. Then 6bit version E49 and M8 came out and it seemed like good idea. I should have kept it then but 28mm no longer wide enough with the crop. 
3) 50mm Summilux ASPH. I need to get another one

[rtai]

11 minutes ago, gigithephotographer said:

I love the pictures that I see coming out of it on the LFI gallery. I buy it and realise how horrible it is to use, because I find the lens too big and awkward, and because the AF is atrocious, so I convince myself that I’m better off with an M and a 28 elmarit. So I sell it. Months later, I go back to the LFI gallery, and I love the pictures that come out of it. Repeat six times. 

I completely understand your reasoning because I own the Q2M and the AF is atrocious.  I have missed a lot of shots with it for street photography. Will you give the Q3 a chance?

[OR120]

reacquired- or borrowed (for me)

That would be the 50 F/1 Noctilux. Many, many years ago I got it on loan (trying it three times) for photo projects. When I was younger I was sure at some point I would buy this lens. I think I convinced myself the F/1 would be perfect for those particular photo stories. Each time the results never lived up to my expectations. On the other hand - my 35, 50, 80 summilux R lenses produced excellent results. I think the grass is always greener................especially when you're young

[rtai]

20 minutes ago, gigithephotographer said:

I did, and I chose to reacquire a Q2 over a Q3. Not the place to discuss this, but I feel like the Q3 is the same generation as the M11 in terms of image output. This means the generation when leica decided to be Sony. I really disliked the image of the M11 which is way too digital for me, and I equally dislike the Q3 rendering. The Q and Q2, however, are really magic. So is the M10. 
I’ll see if the sixth time is the right one for the Q2, but this time I’ll approach it differently. I won’t try to make it the camera for everything, and maybe it’ll be a more long term relationship. 

My current Q2M is my second one and I will keep it. I have come to understand its limitations and will not attempt to make it do what it cannot. I have the M10M for street photography. The Q2M can do everything else.

[Cronilux]

vor 10 Stunden schrieb gigithephotographer:

and because the AF is atrocious

Can you elaborate? My wife uses it to document our kids and they move fast. No issues with the AF here. 

[hansvons]

You guys are crazy, seriously.

[kona]

I have only ever sold one Leica M lens, a 35 cron asph which I absolutely loved. However I used the money to fund its replacement, the 35 APO. I don't need two 35 crons, so I don't think I will buy the asph again.

If I ever sell and re-acquire a lens it will be my brass 50 lux asph to get a lighter one.

Edited December 20, 2023 by kona

[smkoush]

35mm summilux pre-asph. I'm now at the 3rd copy, which I am keeping this time (learned the lesson).  

[Danner]

50 Summicron for sure.  I have had four, maybe five, over the years.  Two V5's, one V3, and my current V4 (favorite).  Not to mention the 50/2 Summitar for my IIIf, but that is another era, LOL.

[Advertisement]

Hallo,

Look here: Leica M

[Cronilux]

vor 12 Stunden schrieb hansvons:

You guys are crazy, seriously.

Let´s be realistic here. Whoever buys Leica Stuff is crazy. There is nothing reasonable about it. It´s all emotions.

[evikne]

3 hours ago, smkoush said:

35mm summilux pre-asph. I'm now at the 3rd copy, which I am keeping this time (learned the lesson).  

Not my most reacquired lens, but when I first bought it, I sold it again pretty quickly. But a while later I gave it a second chance. It's a lens that takes some time to get to know, and this time I tried a little harder. Now it's my most used lens, which I'll probably never sell.