Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Elmar's pictures were taken with a Pre-Announcement, presumably pre-production M11-P, so maybe they do now deserve their own thread.  But the 11-Ps now have arrived in a flood, at least in North America.  I opened mine and charged the battery last night.  I try to buy from Popflash, a non-Leica store that I have used for many years.  Usually they are weeks behind the Leica stores in getting the newest products in quantity, so I got mine through another channel.  But this time they called with a camera available only a few hours after mine had arrived.  Somebody give them a call.

Here's mine:

 

and I have already gotten my first Robert Frankish image with it:

 

Now I'll move to the regular M11 images thread.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/26/2023 at 9:47 PM, Hanno said:

Agreed. 

If there is a difference in IQ between a M11 and a M11-P, it means one of the camera would be defective...

I also agree.

It's like having a thread for the black M11 and another for the silver M11.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor einer Stunde schrieb James1975:

Can any of you lucky owners comment on the reported slow start up time of the P? I’ve read between 3-4 seconds. And that the secure chip slows down continuous shooting compared to the M11. 
And, of course, any issues similar to the (early?) production models like freezing, charging problems over USB etc. 

Startup is the same as with the M11 - too slow, but no change. Charging problems (it was not displayed by the green LED) that the charging had begun, is fixed.

I have pre-tested the firmware 2.0.1. I didn't have any freezes, Leica again fixed some of the causes. But of course that is no guarantee. You won't know how well Leica has done until a lot of people use it.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

CC is switched on for my pictures above as well.  It is the only way in the M11-P to put your artist or copyright string into the dng and the resulting jpeg.  Since I didn't process the images in Adobe tools, I'll have to look to see if the copyright claim has been removed as it passed through Capture One.  You can download my images from Flickr and see.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/26/2023 at 7:45 AM, elmars said:

Beautiful camera with a nice little lens (Summaron 2,8/35 mm). Same size and shape as the famous Summicron 8 elements, but for 1/3 the price. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Beautiful camera and lens combo.

Would love to see more pictures of the M11-P with different lenses.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, scott kirkpatrick said:

CC is switched on for my pictures above as well.  It is the only way in the M11-P to put your artist or copyright string into the dng and the resulting jpeg.  Since I didn't process the images in Adobe tools, I'll have to look to see if the copyright claim has been removed as it passed through Capture One.  You can download my images from Flickr and see.

Downloaded a few of your photos from Flickr, and a few from Elmar as posted in this thread. Dropped them on the content verification webpage, none is reported as having CC attached. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

In my view, if this is correct and not changed, Content Credentials would be largely worthless. Photos are uploaded and distributed on the Internet. Therefore, especially with such images, it should remain traceable who created them and whether they have been changed. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I used Lightroom. I may have an idea why it doesn't work. Content credentials are only saved when exporting with Lightroom (mobile) or Photoshop, but not with LR classic. I used Lightroom for my experiments with Verify, but probably LR classic for the JPG I uploaded here.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, elmars said:

Yes, I used Lightroom. I may have an idea why it doesn't work. Content credentials are only saved when exporting with Lightroom (mobile) or Photoshop, but not with LR classic. I used Lightroom for my experiments with Verify, but probably LR classic for the JPG I uploaded here.

Is this intended like this or just a temporary solution until the next upgrade of LR classic?

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Studienkamera said:

Is this intended like this or just a temporary solution until the next upgrade of LR classic?

all this does make it largerly useless for now.

Should be embeded in away that it doesn't matter of the editing app is compliant or not. Even if you cant see the edits you should be able to trace the image back 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Image export is a crucial part of the Content Credentials implementation. It is a very new tool and the functionality is not yet complete. The image processing programs are responsible for this. The more cameras there are with Content Credentials, the more programs will implement it. But already now you can work well with it, even if you want to do the editing in Lightroom. You then pass the images to Photoshop for export.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...