Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Using a Q3 (Q2 until august 2023) and a SL2 / SL100-400 combo for traveling. Landscape / mountains are my favorites....wildlife about 10 percent. If I scan my photos taken at the mountains of Austria (July) and Norwegian coast (Hurtigruten, May/June) a lot of them are taken with the Q2 / Q3, but about 30-40 percent with the SL2 / 100-400 (wale watching for example...). So I would have missed a lot of photos using only the Q2. Next trip end of September to Spitzbergen / Island / Faroer / Shetland islands  - the Q3 and the SL2 / SL 100-400 will be in my photo-backpack. I would prefer to travel only with my Q3, but.........

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 8/14/2023 at 9:07 AM, viramati said:

If out and about or just on short travels with the Q I will always have my tiny Sony RX100vii in my trouser or jacket pocket with it's 24-200 equivalent lens to capture anything where I need more reach

I've also taken to travelling with only a Q2 and that same Sony RX100 VII.  We are going to Rome, southern Italy, and Sicily next year and I've thought about upgrading to a Q3 but not sure yet about doing that.  I'm not convinced that the images would be that much better considering the cost of trading up, but you never know.   IQ is all the matters to me.  The rest is just fluff, and my Q2 does its job extremely well.  

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Six weeks in France and Italy with just the Q3. I tossed up between the Q3 vs CL plus a couple of lenses vs Sony with 2/3 primes.

I opted for the smallest and simplest option.

The Q3 handled everything I through at it, and never was I caught out wishing I had time to swap lenses. There were times when I might have used a wider or longer lens if I had packed them, but the lack of extra lenses did not trouble me. I took a small flash in case I needed it, but only wanted it once.

I would happily travel again with just the Q3. However, I am incredibly overdue to visit Japan again, and I really like something wider than 28mm when visiting there, so I'll probably leave the Q3 at home on that trip and instead take a kit that includes a wider lens.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, AdHox said:

Six weeks in France and Italy with just the Q3. I tossed up between the Q3 vs CL plus a couple of lenses vs Sony with 2/3 primes.

I opted for the smallest and simplest option.

The Q3 handled everything I through at it, and never was I caught out wishing I had time to swap lenses. There were times when I might have used a wider or longer lens if I had packed them, but the lack of extra lenses did not trouble me. I took a small flash in case I needed it, but only wanted it once.

I would happily travel again with just the Q3. However, I am incredibly overdue to visit Japan again, and I really like something wider than 28mm when visiting there, so I'll probably leave the Q3 at home on that trip and instead take a kit that includes a wider lens.

I was thinking the perfect travel kit for any place that has a lot of interior interesting architecture would be the Q3 and either the SL2 or SL2S with a 12mm or 15mm Voigtlander M mount lens.  It's too bad that none of the wide angle screw on conversion lenses are high enough quality to use with the Q series of cameras.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
On 8/11/2023 at 4:45 PM, Steven_nl said:

I have a Canon R5 and a Fuji XT5. Both with a load of lenses. I got tired of carrying all that stuff and changing lenses when on private trips. Although in a lot of situations both kits would be better. Better zoom, better background blur, I prefer taking the Q3. Yoy can get away with almost eveyting. Versitile (cropping is fine with a lens this good and so many megapixels) Great low light, great black and white excelent app for quick sharing. No hassle with lens swapping and just great fun to use. I love it. 

A few minor thing that could ne better, but great. 

I do recommend getting the (old) handgrip. Not hat expensive and makes a lot of difference holding the camera.

Steven are you satisfied 100% of Q3 Jpegs? I prefer to shot JPEG than RAW. Have Fuji XT5 and Fuji Jpegs are very good

Link to post
Share on other sites

Took an a7iii with 24-105 on the last trip to Asia in Jan, and discovered that 76% of my photos were shot between 24 and 75mm, with 46% 24-40mm. This helped me understand my preferred focal length.

About to embark on a month long trek to Taiwan, Vietnam and Malaysia with a just the Q2 (and 15pro). Looking forward to learning how it works out. I expect that it will be just fine. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, alftan said:

Took an a7iii with 24-105 on the last trip to Asia in Jan, and discovered that 76% of my photos were shot between 24 and 75mm, with 46% 24-40mm. This helped me understand my preferred focal length.

About to embark on a month long trek to Taiwan, Vietnam and Malaysia with a just the Q2 (and 15pro). Looking forward to learning how it works out. I expect that it will be just fine. 

This is the reason I am comfortable travelling with just my Q.

A few years back I went through binders full of negs and realized at least 80% of my images (from a full R3 kit with 21-200 lenses) were taken with a 28 or 35mm.

when I go with my Q those lenses are always at the ready and I’m not toting a bunch of stuff I seldom use.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

You can absolutely get away with it.

Travelled round Japan for 3 weeks with a Q2 and SL2S + 24-105 f4 alternating days, could have just taken either.

With a Q3 the case for just the one camera with iPhone Pro back up is very strong.

However I'll probably do the same next trip but take my 16-35 and 70-300, as well as liking the comfort of a 2nd body I can see a case for extra width and reach just occasionally and I can spare the wt and space in my luggage.

I also really love the SL2S and would miss it.

Edited by huwm
typo as usual
Link to post
Share on other sites

I own a canon R5 with 24-70 and 70/200 lens and a Q3 which has replaced ma Fujifilm XE4. 
My two last two travels (Island and Scotland) I took the two camera. The fact is I shoot 95% with the Q3. Of course there are limits especially with large landscape and sunset for instance and I have missed interesting point of view. But the weight of my canon became more and more difficult. 
Finally I keep my R5 for portrait, macro,  photo with flash and some times for landscape when I don’t have to walk too much. One example last trip which really need a zoom 135 mm and very natural colours, And another where the q3 focal and colours are amazing 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, huwm said:

You can absolutely get away with it.

Travelled round Japan for 3 weeks with a Q2 and SL2S + 24-105 f4 alternating days, could have just taken either.

With a Q3 the case for just the one camera with iPhone Pro back up is very strong.

However I'll probably do the same next trip but take my 16-35 and 70-300, as well as liking the comfort of a 2nd body I can see a case for extra width and reach just occasionally and I can spare the wt and space in my luggage.

I also really love the SL2S and would miss it.

How many photos you took with Q3 and how many with SL2S?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, GREG PLAT said:

How many photos you took with Q3 and how many with SL2S?

 

About equal I expect and 1322 have survived 1st initial cull, hoping to get number reduced by a lot more when I get round to it, 3months later 🙄

Link to post
Share on other sites

My travel kit has been a Q2 & Q2M but I also have a Sony RX100 VII compact that I can use if I need to zoom or just want to carry something small.  I don't typically carry all three, but they do fit in my backpack and are fairly light.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two weeks ago, I was photographing Niagara Falls (a great time to do so since it takes no time at all to cross borders across the bridge, even though some paths were closed due to the remaining snow) with a Sony A7RV, and a 35mm Sigma f2. There was a man with a Leica Qx as well, and although I think 28mm is too short for that part of the world and it was obvious I had a much more comfortable time shooting with the Sony (it was clearly more responsive, with a better EVF experience), I would have traded cameras if I could, there and then. Such a sleek little machine.

I've just decided to order a Q3, trading in some of my Sony gear to soften the landing. I'll probably not use it standalone but as backup, but let's see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Soloed with my Q3 in Florence recently. Amazing ability to get both wide and cropped in shots!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...