Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

1 hour ago, Stuart Richardson said:

I look forward to seeing them side by side. 

yes, me too, hard to tell quite how the SL3 will handle in reality. I still wonder if the need to shrink the SL3 both gets its closer in size to the sony/canon/nikon peers, and also allows for some obvious open water between full frame and a possible S4 mirrorless, ie, to avoid the latter (if it ever emerges) not being too overly scaled in size vs the competition out there such as the X2D or GFX100 ii. Then again, my Mamiya 7 wasn't small and it handled wonderfully!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 4 Stunden schrieb Stuart Richardson:

I hope they stick to a pro sized body if they make an S4 mirrorless.

I strongly hope so too, including the four button layout and the perfected ergonomical shape. Loved so much the S.. 

I silently hoped the new SL3 would in some way get closer to the S design, becoming sort of a baby S, but those images proof me very wrong... 

Nevertheless and no matter the SL3 will finally look like, I'll keep my SL lenses.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, PeterBoyadjian said:

Probably another custom wheel, will be handy in manual mode. I probably use it for shutter and the other for aperture. Back wheel for iso. 

That round on off switch is interesting. 

Wonder if the put a fan in there like the s5ii. 

My SL2S has laser damage so I need a new camera asap 

What do you mean it has laser damage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dr. G said:

What do you mean it has laser damage?

Hard to see but there are a number of pixels that are toast. 

Lasers are a no go from now on, or I'll walk out of a job. 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PeterBoyadjian said:

Hard to see but there are a number of pixels that are toast. 

Lasers are a no go from now on, or I'll walk out of a job. 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Well, that sucks....

We had a clause for years that the client had to cover laser, mist, liquid, chemical, and dust damage to our gear. Fortunately, never had to use it though.

Gordon

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The tiltable screen was bad enough for me, but an extra dial? And once you have those features, there's no going back. The SL4 will retain them. All they needed to do was to boost high-ISO performance -- and if you really must add more MP and better focusing abilities. For me, and I know opinions will vary, they've screwed it up big time. What's more, there's no sign of other APO or non-rebranded lenses. The SL2 (paired with an APO) will in the meantime remain a classic.

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Sohail said:

The tiltable screen was bad enough for me, but an extra dial? And once you have those features, there's no going back. The SL4 will retain them. All they needed to do was to boost high-ISO performance -- and if you really must add more MP and better focusing abilities. For me, and I know opinions will vary, they've screwed it up big time. What's more, there's no sign of other APO or non-rebranded lenses. The SL2 (paired with an APO) will in the meantime remain a classic.

I agree... Beyond the line of superb Leica glass, the real appeal of the SL cameras is their design ethos. I've owned the SL Typ 601 and the CL Digital, both were a pleasure to use because of their minimalist design. As a nature shooter who regularly uses Nikon Z9/Z8 bodies, I drag out my Leica gear when I want to leave the computer-like interface and world of infinite programmable options behind and simply focus on my subject. 

The SL3 didn't even need a higher resolutions sensor, it just needed to fix its AFC performance.

bruce

Edited by BLeventhal
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Photoworks said:

Does anybody like to see it or use it first before dissing it?

until now the Leica developer managed to create a functional design.

Part of the issue is that people here are pondering an upgrade from an SL2, so they pick-out the small differences that might affect their workflow. What really matters to Leica is whether or not it will continue the consistent growth in L-mount adoption. It should, because it's likely to be the best platform for high-resolution imaging in full-frame.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

" ...likely to be the best platform for high-resolution imaging in full-frame." Certainly my expectation with the SL3's 60MP sensor and the SL APO primes...and Leica Multishot with the SL3 = icing on the resolution cake! 

Edited by LBJ2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the new design and love the extra dial. I have the other two dials set to aperture and exp compensation, so I can set the new one to change ISO and I won't have to delve into the menu anymore. This means that I can access all functions I need without taking off my eyes from my subjects. No more unnecessary distractions.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it will be a great camera and helpful in bringing more new people to the brand.

So that’s a win.  

Im not sure if it offers any “must have’s” over the already amazing sl2 and sl2-s because they can already do some heavy lifting.  

I look forward to trying one out.  

Robb

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, robb said:

I think it will be a great camera and helpful in bringing more new people to the brand.

So that’s a win.  

Im not sure if it offers any “must have’s” over the already amazing sl2 and sl2-s because they can already do some heavy lifting.  

I look forward to trying one out.  

Robb

 

As an SL2-S owner the only thing I'm hoping for is a camera with Leica colors and higher resolution with better higher ISO performance than the SL2 (which I used to own).  Judging by the Q3's performance, it seems like the SL3 should address my needs.   

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...