costa43 Posted March 2, 2024 Share #61  Posted March 2, 2024 Advertisement (gone after registration) 27 minutes ago, grahamc said: Hi Costa For me, it was base only on output .  I loaned the M11 a few weeks before the M11-P launch., with the intention of then buying a P. But when I compared my images side by side (same lens) my personal preference was much more in favour of the 10 sensor (more 'pop' to the images, warmer rendering which I prefer, magenta bias in the 11 files). And of lesser concern was my 10-D images were sharper which I suppose was user-error. For my own use case I've not been tempted by m11 since Thanks Graham, I enjoyed your beach candids on the pre asph thread so was curious. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 2, 2024 Posted March 2, 2024 Hi costa43, Take a look here M11 or M10-D. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
grahamc Posted March 2, 2024 Share #62  Posted March 2, 2024 19 minutes ago, costa43 said: Thanks Graham, I enjoyed your beach candids on the pre asph thread so was curious. Great, thanks Costa for the feedback 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenykepesz Posted March 2, 2024 Share #63  Posted March 2, 2024 (edited) vor 17 Stunden schrieb grahamc: Hi Costa For me, it was base only on output .  I loaned the M11 a few weeks before the M11-P launch., with the intention of then buying a P. But when I compared my images side by side (same lens) my personal preference was much more in favour of the 10 sensor (more 'pop' to the images, warmer rendering which I prefer, magenta bias in the 11 files). And of lesser concern was my 10-D images were sharper which I suppose was user-error. For my own use case I've not been tempted by m11 since i am wondering, @grahamc, if this observation of seeing more 'pop' in pictures taken on a pre-M11 cameras as compared to those from an M11* bases on a similar experience (and physical principles) as reported for b&w film photos showing more 'punch' than their digital equivalents ? photos taken with older systems contain frequently different details and contrast ranges that filter and simplify a picture and hence helps its visual consumption. the intellectual message is more apparent and easier to convey and grasp if unnecessary high-quality picture details (*) are not overly present that otherwise just add to noise and mental distraction. imagine a camera that creates drawings like a caricaturist sketches with a pencil : pure simplified raw message ! (*) ADDENDUM : the same could be said about image processing software that generate technically perfect landscapes or eye lashes or that sort... one may be better off with an earlier-generation camera, depending on the type of photography one pursues... now, am i going to sell my M10-D and hope for a 'better' M11-D (provided it comes with a built-in thumb rest) ? Edited March 2, 2024 by fenykepesz Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.