Jump to content

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, gotium said:

It’s too expensive. Or has that come up before?

No, this is not a legitimate complaint here.  The standard answer is what Sir Winston Churchill wrote back to a young man asking him how to keep up with the high cost of living: “If you find yourself in a situation where your expenses overcome your income, you need to work hard to rapidly and dramatically increase the latter.”

Edited by setuporg
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, shirubadanieru said:

 

Very interested now to see what comes out of your tests. @jonoslack the battery report in your review, where you stated you left the power savings off and were able to use it extensively during a full day, seem to be very different from what I’m getting. If you get the chance to chime in would love further input. 

Hi There

Today I started on 100% walked for 3 hours and took around 300 images and it was on 75% (no power saving). I haven't done any events with it (next month!) and I'm not really a machine-gunner in normal circumstances,  but my gut reaction is that the battery life is about 3x that of the M10 (you might say that isn't saying much!).

Put it another way, I've had the camera since August - I only have one battery - I've shot about 30,000 shots and I've never ever needed to recharge during a day's shooting (but I haven't shot a wedding!)

best

 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I ordered my M11 on January 15. The silver chrome, with two extra batteries.
The camera and one battery had arrived to him in one week. I told him to get the camera out of the box
and to do some testing until the second extra battery come and everything can be shipped to me.
 
He told me that he tested the M11 two days, took some photos, used camera like she suppose to be used.
Yesterday evening I got the eMail from him and he said that everything is OK with my camera or at least
he could't find any problems described here in LUF.

I know that is short period for testing but I hope that 
when she arrive to me, the “problems“ will not “arrive“ with her.
I had always get “lucky“ with every Leica camera or lens that I purchased, new or used. 
Will see if this is still the case...

Nikola

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

23 minutes ago, setuporg said:

No, this is not a legitimate complaint here.  The standard answer is what Sir Winston Churchill wrote back to a young man asking him how to keep up with the high cost of living: “If you find yourself in a situation where your expenses overcome your income, you need to work hard to rapidly and dramatically increase the latter.”

Well I don't own one, so I'm not a great source, but from handling one in the shop yesterday 'expensive' would be my big complaint. I guess I'd like the EVF to be even better, but it is probably good enough. Unless it flickers like mad, so I hope that's only yours 😕

Now I'm off to look for work....

Edited by gotium
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, setuporg said:

No, this is not a legitimate complaint here.  The standard answer is what Sir Winston Churchill wrote back to a young man asking him how to keep up with the high cost of living: “If you find yourself in a situation where your expenses overcome your income, you need to work hard to rapidly and dramatically increase the latter.”

I am at a loss to understand the kvetching and moaning over the M11's price.  It is not the most expensive camera on the planet.  That distinction goes to the $58,990 USD Phase One XT IQ4. 

The M11 is not even the most expensive Leica - that honor goes to the $19,995 USD S3 (body only).  Buy the M11 instead of the S3 and congratulations, you just saved $11,000 USD - and yet the M11 still catches hell.

It makes no sense.  I give up. :huh:

 

Edited by Herr Barnack
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Herr Barnack said:

I am at a loss to understand the kvetching and moaning over the M11's price.  It is not the most expensive camera on the planet.  That distinction goes to the $58,990 USD Phase One XT IQ4. 

The M11 is not even the most expensive Leica - that honor goes to the $19,995 USD S3 (body only).  Buy the M11 instead of the S3 and congratulations, you just saved $11,000 USD - and yet the M11 still catches hell.

It makes no sense.  I give up. :huh:

 

I wonder if the m10-r caught this much flak at launch. As far as I'm aware, its just the m10-p with a better sensor.   I'm just happy the m11 is the same price (at least in the US) for a camera with so many improvements (at least to me).  If the m10-r and m11 came out at the same time, I would price the m11 at least 2k higher due to the upgrades since I value them.  

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Herr Barnack said:

I am at a loss to understand the kvetching and moaning over the M11's price.  It is not the most expensive camera on the planet.  That distinction goes to the $58,990 USD Phase One XT IQ4. 

The M11 is not even the most expensive Leica - that honor goes to the $19,995 USD S3 (body only).  Buy the M11 instead of the S3 and congratulations, you just saved $11,000 USD - and yet the M11 still catches hell.

It makes no sense.  I give up. :huh:

 

It does make sense from a psychological perspective because it's so close to the $10K mark. It's easier to spend $9K on an M lens because you can see those as a lifetime purchase and something you could pass on to family. I do hope Leica makes an M-E version of the M11 at some point, perhaps using the SL2-S sensor.

One positive thing about the M11 price – It has me considering a film M.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jonoslack said:

Hi There

Today I started on 100% walked for 3 hours and took around 300 images and it was on 75% (no power saving). I haven't done any events with it (next month!) and I'm not really a machine-gunner in normal circumstances,  but my gut reaction is that the battery life is about 3x that of the M10 (you might say that isn't saying much!).

Put it another way, I've had the camera since August - I only have one battery - I've shot about 30,000 shots and I've never ever needed to recharge during a day's shooting (but I haven't shot a wedding!)

best

 

Thank you! your battery life seems indeed to be what I was expecting. Will have to go to Leica, it seems my battery or my camera are faulty. In a similar day as yours, of walking two hours, power saving set to ten minutes, and shooting (on single burst mode) about 100 shots it used 60% so indeed this is strange. In 3 days of very light use I've had to charge it 3 times already.

@elmars your battery seems to drain as fast as mine, & much faster than all reviews & leicas statement. you might wanna have it checked too. 

Edited by shirubadanieru
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, hdmesa said:

It does make sense from a psychological perspective because it's so close to the $10K mark.

10K is a barrier no doubt.  Personally, given the M10 came in at 6.5K initially four or five ears ago and up until recently we've been in a 2% inflationary environment, $9k seems steep, given the RF, assembly in Germany, etc are likely the primary costs involved as they were previously. But the simple fact is that all cameras are going to continue to get more expensive as the volumes continue to drop. If one looks at top line cameras from Sony and Nikon, they are now in the 6.5K range, the Fuji MFs hit the 10K mark. So yeah, its expensive, painfully so, but it remains right on the edge of reasonable for a top line camera. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Found another minor bug. Turned on camera & it said I had 1K free. 30min later, turned it on again (without changing anything or taking photos) & it said 890 free 🤣 screenshots below w/ timestamps.

Another one not in the sreenshot, when I turn lens detection off, the menu icon on the top right instead of showing 'off' shows 16 / 28 / 50 (it doesn't fit properly in the icon so I can't read it all).

Since the M9 that I've been always an early adopter of leica new cameras with zero issues but this M11 is probably the buggiest of them all..this, on top of the extremely quick battery drain..I hope Leica releases a firmare fix fast...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by shirubadanieru
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 9 Stunden schrieb shirubadanieru:

@elmars your battery seems to drain as fast as mine, & much faster than all reviews & leicas statement. you might wanna have it checked too. 

I did another test:

I took 60 photos in 1 hour, 1 photo each minute. Auto review was set to 3 sec. After 1 hour 90 % battery charge was left. This confirms what I said earlier: Most power is taken from just being on. Being on takes 10 % battery power each hour. Shooting (and even short reviewing of 3 sec for each picture) takes not much power. Even if You assume 15 % per hour, You have a steady use of nearly seven hours. I think this we can call a whole days use.

So I have nothing to complain. Please don´t count me in for a battery problem.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, elmars said:

I did another test:

I took 60 photos in 1 hour, 1 photo each minute. Auto review was set to 3 sec. After 1 hour 90 % battery charge was left. This confirms what I said earlier: Most power is taken from just being on. Being on takes 10 % battery power each hour. Shooting (and even short reviewing of 3 sec for each picture) takes not much power. Even if You assume 15 % per hour, You have a steady use of nearly seven hours. I think this we can call a whole days use.

So I have nothing to complain. Please don´t count me in for a battery problem.

Thank you for your continuous testing. I will also test it out on my side…but it’s weird that some reviews reportedly said we just leave the camera on because the battery is so strong…I never depleted my M9 battery to below 50% in all the years I’ve used it with my regular use (100~200 pics, 2min auto power off)…so I was shocked when the M11 with the same use case went to 40%. I guess I was expecting to much after reading the reviews and CIPA testing…or my battery is faulty (the finish on my battery is different from the base plate..it’s a much rougher black paint than the rest of the base plate, not sure if this is the norm or if it’s the paint used in the earlier prototype..if so, it might mean I just need to change the battery and try again). 

Will continue testing and go to Leica to have them check it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, elmars said:

I did another test:

I took 60 photos in 1 hour, 1 photo each minute. Auto review was set to 3 sec. After 1 hour 90 % battery charge was left. This confirms what I said earlier: Most power is taken from just being on. Being on takes 10 % battery power each hour. Shooting (and even short reviewing of 3 sec for each picture) takes not much power. Even if You assume 15 % per hour, You have a steady use of nearly seven hours. I think this we can call a whole days use.

So I have nothing to complain. Please don´t count me in for a battery problem.

Seven hours sounds comparable to (or maybe even less than) M240…

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, elmars said:

I did another test:

I took 60 photos in 1 hour, 1 photo each minute. Auto review was set to 3 sec. After 1 hour 90 % battery charge was left. This confirms what I said earlier: Most power is taken from just being on. Being on takes 10 % battery power each hour. Shooting (and even short reviewing of 3 sec for each picture) takes not much power. Even if You assume 15 % per hour, You have a steady use of nearly seven hours. I think this we can call a whole days use.

So I have nothing to complain. Please don´t count me in for a battery problem.

was this with EVF or live view on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 23 Stunden schrieb shirubadanieru:

I’m getting from 100% to 40% after an afternoon out, shooting about 100 shots in DNG M-Size. What is going on?! :o 

Interesting. Could you repeat the test and shoot DNG L-Size images? I suppose when shoothing M or S-size the entire photo gets recalculated and downscaled and requires a lot of CPU time. CPU time means battery drain. This process is quite similar to a well known technology in smartphones having more than 40MP. It looks to me like a Leica innovation which popped out of the Huawei smartphone camera partnership. 

Edited by 01maciel
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...