Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

9 hours ago, jaapv said:

I am still ootimistic: The attitude of Yamaki-san is commendable (as are Sigma's many products in recent years):

"If we release the Foveon X3 sensor today and people see the quality, it means a lot for the industry, that’s the reason I’m still passionate about the project."

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I think there are just too many inherent issues with using Silicon based technology to make anything competitive with Bayer pattern sensors in terms of sensitivity of the lower layers. I think perovskite based sensors are much more promising https://www.empa.ch/web/s604/eq83-perovskit-pixel-stapel . Each of different layers of the photosensor can be designed to absorb a specific wavelength range so no color filters are required and they promise much higher sensitivity. I hope Sigma is involved in that technology 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Advertisement (gone after registration)

In a manner of speaking, it wouldn't matter so much if they ever succeeded in making a full format sensor.

I have reduced my 'everyday set' (in quotes because I don't photograph very often any more) to the APS-C format. Epson R-D1 for the rangefinder experience, Leica CL for the occasion where rangefinders are not so well suited. I would love very much to have an APS-C Foveon camera which takes L and M lenses. Since I already own the M-to-L adapter, all it would take would be an L body.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 15 Minuten schrieb pop:

In a manner of speaking, it wouldn't matter so much if they ever succeeded in making a full format sensor.

What would be wrong with a full frame sensor if he could have the same photo and video quality of a aps-c or micro 4/3?
The new and highly discussed Sigma BF has a full frame sensor, L-Mount and is rather tiny and would be a option for being "light".
Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, PhotoCruiser said:

What would be wrong with a full frame sensor if he could have the same photo and video quality of a aps-c or micro 4/3?
The new and highly discussed Sigma BF has a full frame sensor, L-Mount and is rather tiny and would be a option for being "light".
Chris

Only that it doesn't have a Foveon sensor, Chris.

Pete.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor einer Stunde schrieb farnz:

Only that it doesn't have a Foveon sensor, Chris.

Upps, i overseen that as i expected the BF has the highly regarded Faveon sensor.
Chris
 

Edited by PhotoCruiser
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, keeping_a_balance said:

Petapixel podcast this week had a interview with CEO of Sigma, he stated they were still trying their best to make it come to mkt, stating they were finding more complications than anticipated... But seems he feels like he needs to deliver...

 

I've gone back almost exclusively to film, but wanted a digital camera for international travel (film security is too much of a hassle). I waited and waited, even holding on to some of my glass from my late CL, since I thought it would be an excellent "value play." But I gave up waiting, and have a nicely used Blad 907x 50c that is at least somewhat satisfying on its own and slides right onto the back of my 500 C/M and SWC.

I still occasionally use my Sigma DP2-Merrill, which is terrific fun and wonderful images. While I'd be really tempted by a new Sigma Foveon FF in L Mount, I'm no longer counting on it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Very interesting, but looking at this, it may have the same problem that has held back the use of Foveon all these years: too long a light path to the sensitive surface resulting  in too small an acceptance angle which produces unacceptable crosstalk.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, jaapv said:

Very interesting, but looking at this, it may have the same problem that has held back the use of Foveon all these years: too long a light path to the sensitive surface resulting  in too small an acceptance angle which produces unacceptable crosstalk.

I have no grounding in the technology. But if that is the hurdle with the FF Foveon, why wasn't a hurdle with the smaller-chip Foveon? I still use my DP-2 Merrill and, within its limitations of ISO and write speed, it renders fantastically. Still hoping for the FF Foveon in L mount.... 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bags27 said:

I have no grounding in the technology. But if that is the hurdle with the FF Foveon, why wasn't a hurdle with the smaller-chip Foveon? I still use my DP-2 Merrill and, within its limitations of ISO and write speed, it renders fantastically. Still hoping for the FF Foveon in L mount.... 

The link that Jankap posted is for a completely different technology from the Foveon technology and has nothing to do with Foveon.  It is a different type of sensor from either Bayer or Foveon.

Pete.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, farnz said:

The link that Jankap posted is for a completely different technology from the Foveon technology and has nothing to do with Foveon.  It is a different type of sensor from either Bayer or Foveon.

Pete.

Quite, Pete  But I suspect that it has an incidence angle limitation caused by deep wells  Like Foveon, but for a different reason ( long ”tubes” instead of three sensitive layers.)

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Foveon, or the vertial color seperation styructure, has a hopeless disadvanatge in the back illumintaed technology. This is where the horizontal color seperation has the compelling  advantage.  The key issue is how to access the sensor diode.

With horizontal color seperation, the sensor diodes are accessed through the signal pick-up circuits that can be put in another layer as much as possible in the somiconductor structure. Since the sensor diodes are parallelly placed horizontally, there light blocking of the access circuits can be minimized. On the other hand, with vertical color seperation the access circuits will be much more on the way of the sensing layers. So, effectively, the exposure efficicency (in terms of usable exposed area) of the vertical color seperation will always be inferior. 

Carver Mead started the vertical color seperation sensor in 199x, about 10 years earlier than the practical Back illuminated sensor technology. When back illuminated sensor came out, it became more and more obvious that the vertical color seperation would stay inferior to the horizontal color seperation. With more and more vertial layers in the semiconctor structure, Foveon will fall far and far behind.         

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, farnz said:

Do I detect AI generation in the previous comment? 🤔

Pete.

According to my AI detection software : not. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...