Jump to content

Poor man's Thambar


01maciel

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

My copy of the New Petzval Art Lens 85/f2.2 shimmers golden and looks as expensive as could be although the price was less than a tenth of my new M10. People are always amazed when they see the golden lens in front of the relatively tiny M10. It looks like a spare part out of the steampunk Western movie with Will Smith but people are impressed and reckon the lens costs a fortune, ha ha. Anyway, this is not the purpose of the lens. OK the lens is clunky, focussing quite cumbersome, the hassle with its waterhouse blades a pain and it produces more or less unpredictable results. "Man must suffer for nice shots". The photos have a beautiful soft focus, a distorted vintage feel and (sometimes;) a tiny sharp spot in the middle of the photo at f2.2. Wide open the results of the New Petzval Art Lens reminds me of the Thambar imho, isn't it?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 9
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

To me it looks more like a Summar on steroids.

I don't often use my Thambar at 2/2.2 but I don't recall ever seeing a swirly bokeh such as this. I also don't have a lot of close ups but here is one I took a few weeks ago. As you can see, no twirls or swirls here... just dusty neg.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

I would be interested to see more from your lens. Portraits, landscapes please. :)

Edited by ianman
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 54 Minuten schrieb ianman:

To me it looks more like a Summar on steroids.

Interesting, I do not know anything of the Summar so I cannot compare them. Your photo looks impressive and well-ballanced compared to the Petzval. Re the swirly bokeh: yes you are right. I looked almost through the entire Thambar thread and found no swirly bokeh. So lets re-define the New Petzval lens: its a poor man's Thambar with swirly bokeh. Even better!

vor einer Stunde schrieb ianman:

I would be interested to see more from your lens. Portraits, landscapes please.

I am sorry, I do not post any family or friend portraits. But any time soon I'll take some nice landscape photos- I promise :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if it has anything in common with a Thambar but this $200 lens is one of my favorites irrespective of price. Jupiter 85/2 at f/2 and f/4. 

https://photos.smugmug.com/Diverse/n-QFBj4/Sony-A7r2-mod-Jupiter-852/i-DbswJ3N/1/3cebd21c/X4/DSC02314_si-X4.jpg

https://photos.smugmug.com/Diverse/n-QFBj4/Sony-A7r2-mod-Jupiter-852/i-nVzKjZx/0/9750d681/X4/DSC02326_si-X4.jpg

Edited by lct
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

@01maciel Here are a couple of example showing the Summar swirl, both on M9.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 21 Stunden schrieb lct:

Not sure if it has anything in common with a Thambar but this $200 lens is one of my favorites irrespective of price. Jupiter 85/2 at f/2 and f/4

I know the Jupiter lenses are a priceless insider tip. I own the Jupiter 3 1:1.5/50mm (LTM), exactly 60 years old and even rangefinder coupled.  Compared to the Thambar, Summar or Petzval the Jupiter 85/2 seems to be quite sharp in the middle- almost clinical :)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, 01maciel said:

Wonderful. I just had a look to the usual web sites for used lenses and other stuff. The Summar seems to be a collapsible 50mm/f2. Does this work with a M10 without damaging the sensor or other guts of the camera?

IIRC it can be collapsed on the M9, I’ll check & get back to you on that. Can’t say for the 10 but I guess the distance from the mount to the sensor hasn’t changed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 01maciel said:

I know the Jupiter lenses are a priceless insider tip. I own the Jupiter 3 1:1.5/50mm (LTM), exactly 60 years old and even rangefinder coupled.  Compared to the Thambar, Summar or Petzval the Jupiter 85/2 seems to be quite sharp in the middle- almost clinical :)

Both the Thambar and Summar are sharp when stepped down. Of course not to the level of modern lenses but sharp enough for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had an excellent version of the Hektor 7.3cm which could also be seen as a poor man's Thambar. I sold it eventually when I bought the current Thambar - too similar in what they would be used for. The Hektor was more restrained than the Thambar, but sometimes you just have to remove the safety catch and let the lens do what it wants.

Edited by LocalHero1953
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 01maciel said:

I know the Jupiter lenses are a priceless insider tip. I own the Jupiter 3 1:1.5/50mm (LTM), exactly 60 years old and even rangefinder coupled.  Compared to the Thambar, Summar or Petzval the Jupiter 85/2 seems to be quite sharp in the middle- almost clinical :)

Btw you can see a bunch of photos I took with the Summar on film here: https://www.l-camera-forum.com/search/?&q=Summar&type=forums_topic&item=284086&author=ianman&search_and_or=or&sortby=relevancy

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

For a 'poor man's Thambar' , if that is one's desire I recommend the Minolta Varisoft Rokkor 85/2.8.  It's not RF-coupled of course but it can be used with a Visoflex or else used on an L-mount camera with appropriate adaptor.

The Varisoft is particularly unusual because, as its name implies, it allows the photographer to vary the degree of softness with an analogue ring on the barrel that has '3 click points' for quickly selecting the degree of softness if required.  At its softest setting it is softer than the Thambar but also has considerable coma and spherical aberration (which is one of its methods of softening the image) although the Thambar's images are different but more pleasant to my eye.   Since the Varisoft can be adjusted to taste you can choose to what degree you soften the image or scene.  I include an example of the Varisoft deliberately at its softest taken with my SL.

Pete.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, farnz said:

For a 'poor man's Thambar' , if that is one's desire I recommend the Minolta Varisoft Rokkor 85/2.8.  It's not RF-coupled of course but it can be used with a Visoflex or else used on an L-mount camera with appropriate adaptor.

The Varisoft is particularly unusual because, as its name implies, it allows the photographer to vary the degree of softness with an analogue ring on the barrel that has '3 click points' for quickly selecting the degree of softness if required.  At its softest setting it is softer than the Thambar but also has considerable coma and spherical aberration (which is one of its methods of softening the image) although the Thambar's images are different but more pleasant to my eye.   Since the Varisoft can be adjusted to taste you can choose to what degree you soften the image or scene.  I include an example of the Varisoft deliberately at its softest taken with my SL.

Pete.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The lens is unusual and a bit of a curio and dates from the 1970's or 80s and I understand Minolta also produced a 35/2.8 Varisoft as well.

It's a 'special' lens so, like a fisheye, photographers often find one and shoot everything with it until it becomes a gimmick and then it sits on a shelf gathering dust.  I've had mine for a few years and it was, and is, in good shape but the arrival of the pandemic not long after I acquired it means that I haven't used it as much as I'd like.

I think I paid around £200-300 for mine and there were one or two others on the online auction site at the same time.  There are currently 4 on Ebay.co.uk at the moment - 3 from Japan for $400 to $550 and one from the USA for $700.  Since it's a Japanese lens, Bellamy at Japan Camera Hunter might be able to find one for you.

Pete.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

For comparison purposes here's the same scene shot with the Minolta Varisoft Rokkor 85/2.8 set to minimum softness.  I've tried to faithfully replicate the (minimal) post-processing to eliminate that variable.

Pete.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...