Jump to content

Tip for the ZEISS Planar T* 50mm f/2 ZM Lens


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I recently bought a ZEISS Planar T* 50mm f/2 ZM Lens for my M10-P; small, light, great build, excellent IQ, way cheaper than a Summicron. But I’d read some complaints about the Zeiss lens cap falling off all the time, especially with the lens hood affixed. That seemed like it would be annoying. So I took a chance and bought the Match Technical Lens Cap for Leica Q and Q2 Cameras - a hard rubber lens cap with a tether that fits over the lens hood - for $49. Fits like it was made for the Zeiss and seems very protective for when I throw the camera and lens in my go bag. You’re welcome. 😉

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by ChrisL
Link to post
Share on other sites

I share your pain. I lost a couple of Zeiss ZM lens caps, back in the day when I was shooting film with a Zeiss Ikon (wonderful camera) and subsequently shooting digital with a Leica M9 (not so wonderful).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was perhaps a bit spoiled, coming to the M9 after the Zeiss Ikon. The M9 had a relatively inferior viewfinder. In addition, the white balance of the M9 was wildly inconsistent and its frequent lockups tried my patience.

Subjectively, the Zeiss felt much nicer in the hand. The precision of the film advance and the ingenious exposure compensation control were always very pleasant to use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Ikon ZM had a clearer VF than any M model - a very under-rated camera. Different feel than Leica, but very nice to use. I still use mine.

I changed my ZM lenses to generic pinch caps - easier to use, and I haven't lost one.

Edited by TomB_tx
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

7 hours ago, 250swb said:

It's a very small photo, I'm having a hard time seeing if it really is as ugly as it first appears?

Oh I’m sure you could tart it up by gluing on some glitter and crystal, or perhaps painting it a designer color.  Sheesh. 🙄

Link to post
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, ChrisL said:

Oh I’m sure you could tart it up by gluing on some glitter and crystal, or perhaps painting it a designer color.  Sheesh. 🙄

It's hard to deny the fact that it's not an attractive solution.  On the plus side, it would be difficult to forget to remove before taking a shot since it would probably block the entire viewfinder 😉

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Compared to my faster M mount lenses, R mount lenses, and SL lenses, it’s small. As for throwing a camera and lens (w/ clear filter) into my everyday carry bag without a lens cap of some sort, ain’t gonna happen. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure the best place for a lens or hood cap is a drawer and for a filter the deepest pocket of the bag :D. Just kidding but my ZM caps are not worse than Leica's let alone CV's. And they stay in place when removing the hood. BTW there are at least two compact ZM lenses, my all time favorite ZM 35/2.8 and 50/1.5. ZM hoods are sturdy and very nice BTW.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, TomB_tx said:

The ZM Planar hood is identical to the Voigtlander hood for the 35 f1.4 Nokton (which also takes 43mm filters) - and it can be cheaper.

Both are Cosina's i guess but the white paint of ZM hoods is easier to remove so i use them on both ZM and CV lenses for 10+ EUR. You only live once :D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, astrostl said:

Way. It's 2" x 2.7" and 230g - small. The ZM 35/2.8 is 2" x 2.2" and 200g - tiny.

Are you SLR person? For RF person like me, here is J-3  50 1.5 and CV CS 35 2.5, Ultron 2.

35 f2 lens 170g  2.05 x 1.11" this is tiny lens in RF.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Ko.Fe. said:

Are you SLR person? For RF person like me, here is J-3  50 1.5 and CV CS 35 2.5, Ultron 2.

35 f2 lens 170g  2.05 x 1.11" this is tiny lens in RF.

 

Size doesn’t matter?  🤣

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ko.Fe. said:

Facts are matter. You mentioned lens in OP as small, but it isn't. Only if you comparing it to SLR lenses.

Dude, lighten up, this was a joke!  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...